Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509
Original file (BC-2006-00509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-00509
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  27 AUGUST 07


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Applicant makes no contentions, but advises he was court-martialed and
spent six months in jail.

In support of his appeal, applicant provides a copy of a decoration he
was awarded and a letter of evaluation (LOE) rendered on him while  he
was an airman on active duty.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 30  Apr  79.   A
resume of his Airman Performance Reports (APRs) follows:

      Closeout Date               Overall Rating

       25 Jun 80                  9
       25 Jun 81                  9
       18 Oct 81                  Letter of Evaluation
       25 Jun 82                  9
       30 Apr 83                  8
       03 Dec 83                  9
       03 Dec 84                  5

On 15 Oct 84, the applicant was tried by a  special  court-martial  on
the following charges with the findings indicated:

        a.  Guilty of two specifications  under  Article  134  of  the
Uniform  Code  of  Military  Justice  (UCMJ).   (1)  Wrongful  use  of
marijuana on divers occasions from about 1 Nov 83 to about 31  Jul  84
and (2) Wrongful distribution of marijuana on divers occasions  during
the period from about 1 Nov 83 to about 31 Jul 84.

        b.  Guilty of one specification under Article 128,  UCMJ.   He
unlawfully pushed an airman first class in the area of  the  neck  and
shoulders with his hand on or about 18 Sep 84.

The applicant was sentenced to a BCD, confinement at  hard  labor  for
four months, reduction to the grade of airman basic and forfeiture  of
$397.00 pay per month for four months.

The sentence was affirmed by Special Order No. 4 on 15 Dec 86 and  the
applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 16 Dec 86 with a BCD.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau  of  Investigation
(FBI) provided a copy of an investigative  report  pertaining  to  the
former member (Identification Record No. 448991EB9 (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s   request.    The
applicant did not submit  any  evidence  or  identify  any  errors  or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing and  provided  no
facts warranting a change to his character of service.

DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he
was forwarded a copy of the FBI report.  As of this date, this  office
has received no response to any of the aforementioned correspondence.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  The applicant’s discharge had
its basis in his trial and conviction by  a  court-martial.   We  have
seen no evidence by the applicant warranting correction of the actions
taken by the court-martial reviewing  authorities.   In  addition,  in
view of the contents of the FBI  Identification  Record,  we  are  not
persuaded that  the  characterization  of  the  applicant’s  discharge
warrants an upgrade on the basis of clemency; therefore,  we  find  no
basis to warrant favorable action on this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2006-00509  in
Executive Session on 28 June 2006, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

               Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
               Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
               Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated  10 Mar 06.
      Exhibit D.  Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Mar 06; and,
                   SAF/MRBC, dated 17 Apr 06 w/atch
      Exhibit E.  FBI Report.




      MICHAEL J. NOVEL
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01274

    Original file (BC-2006-01274.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 May 84 the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force based n the following: 1) 28 Mar 84, applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for substandard performance. Novel, Panel Chair Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-01274 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 06, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 May 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00704

    Original file (BC-2005-00704.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    They also noted applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing and provided no other facts warranting a change to his character of service. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Mar 05 for review and comment within 30 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875

    Original file (BC-2005-03875.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00632

    Original file (BC-2005-00632.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 81, for a period of six years in the grade of airman basic. Applicant was discharged on 29 Nov 83, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Pattern Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. We find no evidence of error in this case...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00071

    Original file (BC-2005-00071.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Mar 82, the Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period 29 Jan 81 through 28 Jan 82, was referred to the applicant. Time lost for the following periods: 28-31 Oct 81, 15-16 Dec 81, 29 Jan- 1 Feb 82, 16-21 Feb 82, and 20 May 82-23 Sep 82. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jan 05 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02854

    Original file (BC-2006-02854.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02854 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 24, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01602

    Original file (BC-2007-01602.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01602 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 24 OCTOBER 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his application, the applicant submits a copy of his DD 214 and his application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01166

    Original file (BC-2006-01166.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Nov 83, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years in the grade of staff sergeant. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02180

    Original file (BC-2006-02180.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was separated from the Air Force on 27 August 1984 under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administration Separation of Airman (request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial), with an UOTHC discharge. On 27 Aug 84, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, with a reason for separation of Request for discharge in lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, with service characterized as UOTHC. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03698

    Original file (BC-2006-03698.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices during the discharge processing warranting a change in his RE code. The complete HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 12 Jan 07 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit F). Exhibit B.