RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02854
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 24, 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served his country to the best of his ability. The applicant also
states he served 2 years in Germany, was subjected to brutality from his
fellow countrymen, and was treated unfairly as to what actually happened.
The applicant provided no additional documentation to support his request.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 27 Mar 80 and served
for a period of 2 years. A resume of his Airman Performance Reports (APRs)
follows:
Closeout Date Overall Rating
26 Mar 81 7
15 Feb 82 6
The applicant’s commander notified him on 17 Feb 82 that he was
recommending the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force for
unsuitability. The commander recommended the applicant receive an under
honorable conditions discharge (general) based on the following:
a. 18 Nov 80 – applicant received an Article 15 for being drunk and
disorderly on station. The applicant received a suspended
reduction in grade and reduction in pay.
b. 3 Feb 81 – applicant received notification of being overdrawn
from savings account.
c. 11 May 81 - applicant received a vacation of suspension for
failure to go.
d. 12 May 81 – applicant received a deferred payment default.
e. 28 May 81 – applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for failure
to pay an outstanding debt.
f. 15 Dec 81 – applicant received an Article 15 for being drunk and
disorderly on station.
g. 6 Jan 82 – applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go.
Examiner’s Note: The applicant was denied the Good Conduct Medal on 28 May
81 and denied promotion on 14 Jul 81.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of discharge notification, waived his
right to a board hearing, and declined to submit statements in his own
behalf.
The applicant was discharged for unsuitability – apathy, defective attitude
and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge from the Air
Force 26 Mar 82, under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Separation for
Unsuitability, Misconduct, Resignation, or Request for Discharge for the
Good of the Service and Procedures for the Rehabilitation Program.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to identify with an arrest record
pertaining to the applicant.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in the
master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge
was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did
not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred
in the discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting a change to
his under honorable conditions (general) discharge.
The AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Oct
06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we have seen no
evidence indicating that the former member was improperly discharged or
that an upgrade of his service characterization is warranted. Accordingly,
the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02197
in Executive Session on 21 Nov 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2006-
02854 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 3 Oct 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509
DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00882
On 4 Feb 82, in a Waiver of Disposition Board Proceedings, the applicant voluntarily indicated he no longer wished to participate in the 3320th Correction and Rehabilitation Squadron (CRS) Program at Lowry AFB, CO. On 4 Mar 82, the 3320 CRS commander notified the applicant he was recommending a general discharge for failure to complete the Rehabilitation Program and because of evidence of misconduct documented in the applicant’s military record. After 2 years, 10 months, and 15 days of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01197
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01197 INDEX CODE 100.06, 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect (1) a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that allows reenlistment, (2) additional time served, and (3) receipt of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the Expert...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00071
On 11 Mar 82, the Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period 29 Jan 81 through 28 Jan 82, was referred to the applicant. Time lost for the following periods: 28-31 Oct 81, 15-16 Dec 81, 29 Jan- 1 Feb 82, 16-21 Feb 82, and 20 May 82-23 Sep 82. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jan 05 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03896
On 28 Jul 83, the base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended applicant’s unconditional waiver be accepted and that he be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 5 Aug 83, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for a pattern of misconduct - discreditable involvement with military or civil authorities, with an under other than...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02661
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 29 Nov 74. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02661 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-004691
On 10 Mar 82, he was discharged from the Air Force with service characterized as UOTHC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02681 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason (Misconduct-Drug Use) for his 1983 honorable discharge be removed from his DD Form 214. On 18 Nov 83, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00279
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00279 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). ___________________________________________________________________ The following members...