RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02675
INDEX NUMBER: 145.00
COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 APR 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to show she served a total of 20 years active duty
service vice 19 years, 10 months and 23 days.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She needs 45 days added to her active duty service to become eligible for a
20-year retirement.
In support of her request, the applicant submits a copy of Special Order
Number ACD-1609 and a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 14 December 1978, for a
period of four years. She was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board in
May 1997, for History of Stroke, Cognitive Disorder, Depressive Affect,
Hypertension, and Abnormal MRI.
On 24 June 1997, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) considered
her case and rated her occupational impairment at 30%. The applicant
disagreed with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and
requested a formal hearing. The IPEB found her unfit for continued
military service and recommended disability retirement at 30%. On 6
November 1997, the applicant was relieved from active duty and placed on
the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective 7 November 1997. On
19 June 1999, while on the TDRL, the applicant waived her earlier election
to demand a Formal Hearing and concurred with the IPEB’s recommendations
and findings. Her waiver request was approved on 18 June 1999, and her
permanent disability retirement order was published on 24 June 1999. She
was removed from the TDRL and permanently disability retired under the
provisions of Title 10 USC 1201 effective 14 July 1999, with a 30%
disability rating. She served a total of 19 years, 10 months and 23 days
of active duty service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states in part, the preponderance of
evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability
process nor at the time of separation. Proper documentation was noted on
her DD Form 214 on the number of years served on active duty in accordance
with provisions of 10 USC 1201.
The DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends denial. DPPRRP states in part, time spent on the
TDRL does not count as active service for retirement, even though a member
may be later found to be fit for duty by a Physical Evaluation Board and
returned to active duty. As indicated on the applicant’s DD Form 214, her
active service for retirement is 19 years, 10 months and 23 days. The law
clearly states that, to retire under title 10 USC 8914, the applicant must
have at least 20 years of active service. All documentation indicates she
has 19 years, 10 months, and 23 days of active service that is insufficient
to retire under 10 USC 8914.
The DPPRRP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6
Oct 06, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Evidence has not been presented which
would lead us to believe that her disability retirement and the final
disposition of her case were in error or contrary to the governing Air
Force Instructions which implements the law. In this respect, we note, the
law states, to retire under Title 10 USC 8914, a person must have at least
20 years of active service. The evidence of record shows the applicant has
19 years, 10 months, and 23 days of active service, which is insufficient
to retire under Title 10 USC 8914. In regard to the applicant’s request to
change her service for basic pay to reflect 20 years, 2 months and 11 days,
rather than 20 years 1 month and 11 days, the Board acknowledges her record
was administratively corrected to reflect this change on 4 January 1999.
Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 December 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-02675:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Aug 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 15 Sep 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 21 Sep 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Oct 06.
JOHN B. HENNESSEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02836
The Informal Physical Evaluation (IPEB) reviewed the documents submitted by the applicant and the medical records at the time of his discharge and was very confident the diagnosis of Crohn's disease was correct. The complete Medical Consultant evaluation is at exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was diagnosed with Crohn's in December 1996 but does not have it. This would allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02289
Since being placed on, and then removed from the TDRL, the documented inconsistencies within the Air Force and Air Force Reserve are working against him to continue to serve his country. He had 17 years, 3 months, and 22 days of military service for basic pay _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommended denial and stated the prepondence of evidence reflects that no injustice occurred during his processing to separate under...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01161 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that she was honorably discharged rather than retired on Temporary Disability on 27 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01788
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His retirement date from the Air Force should read 1 April 1978, per Special Orders AC-007859, dated 8 April 1977, giving him 20 years and 28 days of the active military service to qualify for CRDP. In support of his appeal, applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, AF Form 2653, Retirement Special Order-Physical Unfit, AFMPC...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01328 INDEX CODES: 121.02, 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) effective 1 Mar 99; and, she receive back pay from 1 Mar 99 until the date her name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03437
The MEB recommended she be continued on active duty and referred her records to the IPEB for evaluation. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluations, the applicant stated she is very bothered by the Air Force advisories.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03328
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement, a copy of DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Removal from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and Permanent Retirement letter, and Department of the Air Force Special Order No. DPPD states that a review of the applicant’s military personnel and medical records reveals she was issued a DD Form 214, dated 4 August 1995, when she was placed on TDRL under AFI-36-3203. The DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00029 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUL 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show she served a full 20 years of active service; or, she be reinstated back into the military to...