Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02082
Original file (BC-2006-02082.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02082
            INDEX CODE:  100.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  15 JAN 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended in  block
9a, type of separation, to read discharge rather than retirement.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List  (TDRL)  on  26  June
1978 and removed on 7 April 1981.  He states he has not received  a  monthly
Air Force retirement check since he was discharged.

In support of his request, the applicant provided documents  extracted  from
his military personnel records.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 16 May 1978  and  referred  his
case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB)  with  a  diagnosis  of
schizophrenia, paranoid  type,  chronic,  moderate;  social  and  industrial
adaptation impairment.  On 26 June 1978, he was  placed  on  the  TDRL.   On
4 February 1981, the IPEB found  him  unfit  for  further  military  service
based on a diagnosis of schizophrenia.  The  IPEB  recommended  that  he  be
discharged with a compensable rating of 10%.  The applicant agreed with  the
findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB.  On 7 April 1981,  he  was
removed from the TDRL  and  discharged  in  accordance  with  special  order
number AC-5057.  He served 8 years, 4 months, and 6 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states  a  DD  Form  214  is  to  show  a
member’s active duty time.  Time spent on the TDRL is not active duty  time.
 When a member is removed from the TDRL, a new DD Form 214  is  not  issued.
Rather, the member receives a special order  indicating  his  final  status.
That order becomes a permanent part of his military personnel file, and  can
be attached to his DD Form 214 reflecting his final disposition.   To  amend
or change his DD Form 214 would be in violation of Air Force Instructions.

The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 11 August 2006, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for  review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  Evidence has not been  presented  which
would lead us to believe that the regulations in effect  at  the  time  were
not appropriately applied or that he was treated differently than others  in
similar  situations.   Accordingly,  we   agree   with   the   opinion   and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility  and  adopt
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting  the  relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
02082 in Executive Session on 13 September 2006,  under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Gary G. Sauner, Member
                 Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jul 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 25 Jul 06.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Aug 06.




                       MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                       Panel Chair









Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03698

    Original file (BC-2004-03698.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03698 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Mandatory Case Completion Date: 7 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation be changed to reflect an effective date of 18 Feb 76, rather than 1 Sep 77. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00971

    Original file (BC-2006-00971.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00971 INDEX CODE: 124.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her burn injuries to her upper and lower back be reflected on the AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Information Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB), dated 15 July 2004. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00222

    Original file (BC-2003-00222.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After considering the applicant’s medical records, including information pertaining to the applicant’s treatment for the lacunar stroke, on 27 February 2002, the IPEB recommended the applicant be permanently retired because of physical disability with a compensable rating of 30% for major depressive disorder associated with myofascial pain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02675

    Original file (BC-2006-02675.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRRP states in part, time spent on the TDRL does not count as active service for retirement, even though a member may be later found to be fit for duty by a Physical Evaluation Board and returned to active duty. The DPPRRP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 Oct 06, for review and comment within...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01241

    Original file (BC-2004-01241.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Jun 87, the Air Force PEB recommended he be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 40%. His records show documented evidence that he had complained of back pain as early as 1963, two years prior to being in Thailand. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterates his account of the incident in which he was injured, provides...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00683

    Original file (BC-2005-00683.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of removal from the TDRL, the IPEB determined that the evidence of the medical evaluation warranted a rating less than 30 percent and, with his concurrence, the applicant was discharged with severance pay in accordance with law and DOD policy. A service medical record entry after the PEB recommending placement on the TDRL but before the effective date and separation from active duty dated 20 October 1994 indicates the applicant was doing well without symptoms while on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01197

    Original file (BC-2005-01197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Feb 02, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended the applicant be placed on the TDRL with a disability rating of 30% for PTSD with major depression. An 18 Aug 03 Narrative Summary revealed she continued to experience ongoing neurovegetative signs and symptoms of depression and breakthrough PTSD symptoms with frequent flashbacks of her father’s death. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01206

    Original file (BC-2002-01206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to being evaluated by the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB), the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of AFR 35-4 (Placed on Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)). Following a period of observation and treatment on TDRL status, he was permanently disability retired on 12 Jun 1986, with a disability rating of 40 percent for his condition and received pay in the grade of colonel, with over 26 years...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02836

    Original file (BC-2006-02836.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal Physical Evaluation (IPEB) reviewed the documents submitted by the applicant and the medical records at the time of his discharge and was very confident the diagnosis of Crohn's disease was correct. The complete Medical Consultant evaluation is at exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was diagnosed with Crohn's in December 1996 but does not have it. This would allow him to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610

    Original file (BC-2001-03610.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...