Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02016
Original file (BC-2006-02016.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02016
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE:  10 JANUARY 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show  he  was  awarded  the  Aerial  Achievement
Medal (AAM) w/2OLC, the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) w/4OLC,  the  Korean
Defense  Service  Medal  (KDSM),  the  Iraq  Campaign   Medal   (ICM),   the
Afghanistan  Campaign  Medal  (ACM),  and  the  Global  War   on   Terrorism
Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E).

Examiner’s Note:  DPPPR was able to verify the  applicant’s  entitlement  to
the Aerial Achievement Medal w/2 OLC,  the  Meritorious  Service  Medal  w/4
OLC, the Korean Defense Service Medal,  and  the  Global  War  on  Terrorism
Expeditionary Medal, and a DD  215  has  been  issued  with  these  changes.
Therefore, only the ICM and ACM medals need to be addressed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The ICM and ACM medals were not updated in  his  personnel  records  because
DoD did not have the final criteria established.  The awards  were  approved
after his records and DD Form 214 were closed out by his Military  Personnel
Flight.  He spoke with the Awards and Decoration  personnel  and  they  gave
him guidance [sic] that he was authorized all three awards.  As  an  aircrew
member on C-5 aircraft, he flew missions in  direct  support  of  all  three
campaigns.  He was deployed to Manas Air base, Kyrgyz Republic from  20  Feb
04 to 5 May 04 and flew combat missions within Iraq and Afghanistan.

In support of his application, the applicant submits his personal  statement
and  copies  of  the  following:   citations,   special   orders,   enlisted
performance reports, and travel vouchers.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 31 Aug 04, the applicant was honorably  relieved  from  active  duty  and
retired in the grade of CMSgt.  He was credited with 32 years  and  21  days
of total active duty service to include 8 years, 10 months and  18  days  of
Foreign Service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for the  ACM
and ICM.  DPPPR states the ACM may be awarded to members  of  the  Uniformed
Services of the United States who serve or who have  served  in  Afghanistan
(or its contiguous air space) in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM  from
24 October 2001 to a date to be determined.  To be eligible for the  ACM,  a
service member must be assigned or  attached  to  a  unit  participating  in
Operating EUDURING FREEDOM for 30  consecutive  days  or  60  nonconsecutive
days in Afghanistan.

DPPPR states the ICM is awarded to recognize service members who  served  or
have served in the country of Iraq and the contiguous water area out  to  12
nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land area  of  Iraq  above  the
contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles  of  Iraq.   Service  members
must have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units  operating  in  the
area of eligibility for 30  consecutive  days  or  60  nonconsecutive  days.
Service members qualified for the GWOT-E by reasons of  service  between  19
March 2003 and  28  February  2005,  in  an  area  for  which  the  ICM  was
subsequently  authorized  shall  remain  qualified  for  that  medal.   Upon
application, any such service members may not be  entitled  to  both  medals
for the same deployment, action, achievement, or period of  service.   DPPPR
was unable to locate source documentation to determine the quantity of  days
in the area of eligibility to substantiate the requirements for the  ACM  or
the ICM.

The complete DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response dated 2 October 2006, the applicant reiterates  his  earlier
contentions and submits a trip  report  that  was  not  submitted  with  his
initial application (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
records, we found no evidence that the applicant is eligible for  the  award
of the ICM or ACM medals.  Additionally, the documentation provided  by  the
applicant does not meet the award criteria as specified  by  the  Air  Force
office of primary responsibility.  Therefore, we agree  with  HQ  AFPC/DPPPR
that the applicant does not  meet  the  requirements  for  the  ICM  or  ACM
awards.  The personal sacrifice the applicant endured  for  his  country  is
noted and the  recommendation  to  deny  the  requested  relief  in  no  way
diminishes the high regard we have for his service.  Nevertheless,  in  view
of the above, we find no basis to favorably consider this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 24 October 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
            Mr. James L. Sommer., Member
      Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-02016:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 25 Jul 06.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 06.
      Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, 2 Oct 06, w/atchs.




      MICHAEL V. BARBINO
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00996

    Original file (BC-2006-00996.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00996 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 OCTOBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Gallant Unit Citation (GUC), Meritorious Unit Award (MUA), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), and the Global...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017

    Original file (BC-2006-02017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02518

    Original file (BC-2010-02518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ACM may be awarded to members who serve or have served in Afghanistan (or its contiguous air space) in support of OEF from 24 Oct 01 to a date to be determined. Eligibility for the ICM requires service members to have served in direct support of OIF. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-02518 in Executive Session on 13 January 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02701

    Original file (BC 2014 02701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect award of any other applicable medals and certificates based on his time of service. The applicant has not provided supporting documentation to show that he was deployed and participated in a “designated area” for 30 days consecutive or 60 days nonconsecutive in order to be awarded the ACM and ICM. The applicant is requesting any other applicable medals and certificates but without supporting documentation to show what acts were performed at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00612

    Original file (BC-2009-00612.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), the Iraqi Campaign Medal (ICM), and the Meritorious Service Medal with five Oak Leaf Clusters (MSM w/5 OLC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The guidance for award of the requested medals was not available at the time he retired in 2004. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00218

    Original file (BC-2007-00218.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with “V” device for his 2005 deployment, and the Air Force Expeditionary Service Medal (AFESM) with Gold Border, which proves he was in a hostile environment. They advise the Army CAB may be awarded to any soldier after 18 September 2001 performing duties in an area where hostile fire pay or imminent danger pay is authorized, who is personally present and actively engaged or engaged by the enemy. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02483

    Original file (BC-2006-02483.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denying the applicant’s request to insert his EPR closing 28 January 2003 into his military personnel records. DPPPR states that in February 2004, the Department of Defense approved award of the KDSM to Air Force active duty personnel for military service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and surrounding waters after 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03338

    Original file (BC 2007 03338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the individual is eligible for the award of the ACM or ICM. The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to substantiate that he is eligible for the ACM or ICM or, that he was recommended for these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019865

    Original file (20090019865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the GWOTSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in the Global War on Terrorism operations outside of the designated areas of eligibility (AOE) on or after 11 September 2001 to a future date to be determined. Based on the evidence of records, it appears the applicant had six separate deployments to Afghanistan. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011509

    Original file (20130011509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in GWOT operations outside of the areas of eligibility designated for award of the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, ACM, or ICM. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding a third award...