RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01027
INDEX CODE: 121.03
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 6 OCTOBER 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Eight (8) days of leave be added to his current leave balance.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told by the Hanscom 66th ABW orderly room that he could not take
both PTDY for house hunting in conjunction with leave before a permanent
change of station (PCS) to Hanscom AFB, MA to Gunter Annex, AL. The
personnel clerk did not understand AFI 36-3003, para 12.3.6 on page 45.
Therefore, he used personal leave for the entire trip instead of utilizing
his authorized house hunting time. If his leave record in 2005 is viewed,
he did not utilize any PTDY for house hunting or otherwise.
In support of the application, the applicant submits a copy of his PCS
order,
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of major.
According to the member's leave account, he was on leave from 11 July
2005 through 1 August 2005 (See Exhibit B).
The member started his travel 4 August 2005 and arrived at Maxwell AFB, AL
on 7 August 2005. `
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSO recommends denial and states the applicant used ordinary leave
for his PCS move instead of authorized permissive TDY. IAW AFI 36-3003,
Table 7, Rule 1, the losing commander may approve up to 10 days before the
member signs out of the unit. According to the member's statement, he
elected to take ordinary leave while enroute to his next duty location in
an effort to secure off-base housing. AFI 36-3003, table 7, Rule 2 states
that members are also authorized PTDY once they arrive at their permanent
duty location and the commander may approve up to 8 days. Since the
applicant had the opportunity and did not sign in to his unit and apply for
permissive TDY, there was no error or injustice caused by the Air Force.
The applicant also states that the CSS did not understand para 12.3.6,
which states that the commander may authorize PTDY with ordinary leave.
However, the CSS provided correct information to the applicant; according
to para 12.3.11, unit commanders will "not authorize PTDY for house hunting
enroute with PCS." The member was also contacted on 8 May 2006 to provide
additional information to support his case; however, the information has
not been received by this office.
AFPC/DPSO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 14 July 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation
provided by the Air Force and adopts its rationale as the basis for our
conclusions that the applicant has not been the victim of either an error
or an injustice. In this respect, the Board notes that once the applicant
arrived at his permanent duty location and signed in, the commander may
approve up to eight days permissive leave. It appears the applicant had the
opportunity and did not sign in to his new unit and apply for permissive
TDY. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
01027 in Executive Session on 26 September 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
`The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2006-
01027 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Mar 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSO, dated 10 Jul 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01244
His wife and son remained hospitalized until 20 September 2002 and the applicant was ordered to return to Malstrom AFB on 21 September 2002. Consequently, the applicant could have been authorized PTDY for the period that his wife was hospitalized: 4 through 15 July 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01244 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01234
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Further, the Board notes the applicant submitted no evidence to substantiate his claim his final payment was in error with respect to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768
If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03070
In support of his request, applicant provided TDY and PCS orders, and leave documents. DPSO finds no compelling evidence suggesting the applicant was unable to take 21.5 days of leave throughout FY06 and concludes the leave lost was not an error or injustice caused by the Air Force. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate his claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to grant his request.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00496
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends denial because the applicant was not representing the Air Force in a DOD-sanctioned event or role. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). Had there been sufficient time for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02544
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informally advised that applicant’s leave balance upon departing on Permanent Change of Station (PCS) was 14.5 days; he was charged 29 days leave upon reporting to his new duty station at Mountain Home AFB. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSFM recommends denial and states that applicant was not considered Present for Duty, TDY, PTDY or in an enroute status for the stated period. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03436
On 21 February 2003, the applicant applied for ten days of PTDY from 25 February to 6 March 2003 and for Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003 and the leave was approved as evidenced by AF Form 988’s. Her original request for PTDY and Terminal Leave were on separate AF Form 988’s for ten days PTDY (leave approved by the commander but not debited against the leave account) from 25 February to 6 March 2003, and for 73 days of Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003. After careful...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008495
The applicant requests correction of: * Orders 126-374, dated 6 May 2010, to show he was ordered to Full-Time National Guard Duty - Operational Support (FTNGD-OS) for the period 1 May to 30 September 2010 vice 7 May 2010 to 30 September 2010 * his records to show he was entitled to and used 10 days permissive temporary duty (PTDY) vice 10 days ordinary leave in September 2010 (emphasis added) 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was issued orders to FTNGD-OS with the CA CDTF,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02832 INDEX CODE: 121.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 23, 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All, or some, of the 20 days leave he lost during FY 2005 be restored. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D. C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-03234 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: current' leave account. Air Force policy authorizes PTDY for house hunting...