Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00520
Original file (BC-2006-00520.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-00520
            INDEX CODE: 107.00
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  26 Aug 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214 reflects receipt of the Southwest Asia  Service  Medal
(SWASM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She qualifies for the medal due to European rotation flight support to
Turkey during the third phase of Operation Dessert Storm.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The SWASM, authorized 12 Mar 91, is awarded to  military  members  who
served in support of Operation  Desert  Shield/Storm  (ODS/S)  between
2 Aug 90 and 30 Nov 95 in one of the following areas:   Persian  Gulf,
Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf  of  Aden,  a  specified  portion  of  the
Arabian Sea, the land areas  of  Iraq,  Kuwait,  Saudi  Arabia,  Oman,
Bahrain, Qatar, and the  United  Arab  Emirates;  or  individuals  who
served in Eqypt, Israel, Turkey, Syria, and Jordan directly supporting
combat operations between 17 Jan 91 and 30 Nov 96.

The applicant entered active duty on 15 Nov 89 as a navigator  in  the
Reserve grade of 2nd lieutenant (2LT).  She served in support of ODS/S
during the period 2 Aug 90 to 15 Jun 92.   On  15 Jun  92,  after  two
years, seven months and one  day,  she  was  honorably  released  from
active duty in the grade of 2LT under the provisions of the  Voluntary
Early Separation Program and transferred to the USAF Reserves.

On 3 Mar  05,  HQ  AFPC/DPAPP  requested  the  applicant  provide  any
documents (vouchers,  orders,  flight  records,  etc.)  verifying  the
location and length of any trip she made into Turkey.   She  was  also
advised her records would be administratively corrected to reflect her
tour of duty in Panama.  The applicant did not respond to the  request
for additional documentation.

_____________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there are no documents  in
the applicant’s military personnel record, nor has she  provided  any,
to show she was on any flights to Turkey.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 21 Apr 06 for review and comment within 30 days  (Exhibit
D).  As of this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
evidence  of  record  and  the  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded she is entitled to award  of  the  SWASM.   The  applicant’s
contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  we   do   not   find   these
uncorroborated  assertions,  in  and   by   themselves,   sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air  Force.   The
applicant was invited to provide documents verifying the location  and
length of a trip she contends she made to Turkey.  She did not respond
and her available records also do not support her claim.  We therefore
agree with  the  recommendations  of  the  Air  Force  and  adopt  the
rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that  the  applicant
has not sustained her burden of having suffered either an error or  an
injustice.  In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 1 June 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
                 Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-00520 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Feb 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 14 Apr 06.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Apr 06.





                                   JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737

    Original file (BC-2010-02737.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01121

    Original file (BC 2014 01121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the SWASM for his support of Operation VIGILANT WARRIOR and that time should be reflected as foreign service on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the Board review the documentation provided by the applicant and determine if it is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00511

    Original file (BC-2012-00511.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of correcting the applicant’s record to reflect he served in ODS based on the fact that his record does not reflect any foreign service time. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01125

    Original file (BC 2014 01125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Foreign Service in Saudi Arabia during Operation DESERT STORM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03833

    Original file (BC 2014 03833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation located in the applicant’s military personnel records to show he was deployed to Turkey in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM during the inclusive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02310

    Original file (BC-2008-02310.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 25 Jul 08, for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04168

    Original file (BC-2010-04168.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the documentation submitted and the applicant’s military records do not support he served in Saudi Arabia. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Feb 11, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02619

    Original file (BC-2006-02619.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. Although his performance reports list several deployments, none state that he served in the AOE and the statement contained on his DD Form 214 stating he served in support of ODS/S, is the standard statement contained on all members discharge certificates who served during ODS/S. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01185

    Original file (BC-2011-01185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04799

    Original file (BC-2011-04799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) is awarded to Service members that must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that operated within the area or eligibility (AOE) for 30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days on or after 19 Mar 03 to a future date to be determined (TBD) by the Secretary of Defense. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...