Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03777
Original file (BC-2005-03777.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03777
                                  INDEX CODE:  131.00
                                  COUNSEL:  NONE
                                  HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE:  17 JUNE 2006
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His correct grade be restored.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was improperly removed from the  lieutenant  colonel  promotion  list  in
1981 or 1982.  Several people  have  mentioned  that  they  believe  he  was
promoted and then removed without his  knowledge.   He  has  repressed  this
thought for many years and would like vindication  and  restoration  of  his
correct pay grade.

Applicant provides  no  supporting  documentation.   His  submission  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 September 1983, the  applicant  was  relieved  from  active  duty  and
retired in the grade of  major  effective  1 October  1983  (Retirement  for
Years  of  Service  Established  by  Law).   Applicant  was  credited   with
20 years, 1 month and 24 days of total active duty  service  for  basic  pay
and active service for retirement.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPO  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   DPPPO   states   the
applicant retired from active duty as a major on 1 October 1983.   Based  on
his date of rank of major effective 27 June 1973, he was  eligible  to  meet
the T05 CY78 (21 August 78), T05 CY79 (20 August 1979), T05  CY80  (21  July
1980), T05 CY81 (2 February 1981) and T05 CY82  (26  July  1982)  Lieutenant
Colonel Central Selection Boards. and was a nonselect.   DPPPO  advises  the
applicant was a nonselect for these boards and had be been  removed  from  a
list, a copy of the removal would have been a permanent part of  his  master
personnel record.  A review of his master personnel record  did  not  reveal
any derogatory information which  could  have  been  used  as  a  basis  for
removal action.  The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 17 February 2006, a copy of the Air Force  evaluation  was  sent  to  the
applicant for review and comment.  As of this  date,  this  office  has  not
received a response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the  evidence
of record, we are not  persuaded  that  the  applicant’s  record  should  be
corrected  to  reflect  the  grade  of  lieutenant   colonel.    Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we do  not  find  these  uncorroborated
assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive  to  override  the
evidence of record or the rationale provided by  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility.  We therefore agree with  their  recommendation  and
adopt the rationale expressed  as  the  basis  for  our  decision  that  the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has  suffered  either  an
error or an injustice.  Therefore, we find no basis  to  recommend  granting
the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 12 April 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
           Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
           Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr, Member

The following documentary evidence related to  AFBCMR  Docket  No.  BC-2005-
03777 was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Dec 05.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 12 Feb 06.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 06.





                             KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01418

    Original file (BC-2006-01418.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPO states the applicant fails to provide any evidence or documentation of reasonable diligence to correct his record prior to board. Additionally, he had sufficient time to verify his Officer Selection Record and request his current duty title be included on his OSB before the board convened on 6 July 2005. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 25 May 06, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01844

    Original file (BC-2007-01844.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s respective OPR and Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) contained the correct duty title as HH-60G Instructor pilot/Assistant Director of Operations, which the board members reviewed and took into consideration in evaluating his record. The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that despite several attempts to correct his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01692

    Original file (BC-2005-01692.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01692 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 November 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY02B (12 November 2002) Lieutenant Colonel Central...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00127

    Original file (BC-2006-00127.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00127 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 JUL 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2005A (CY05A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) be corrected to reflect his deployment to Afghanistan from 8...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01012

    Original file (BC-2004-01012.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His completion of Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) in November 1977 may not have been available for evaluation by any of the promotion boards from 1977 to 1983. DPPPO provides OSBs as evidence that an error did not exist in the applicant's record when it met the respective promotion boards. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01209

    Original file (BC-2007-01209.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His two Air Medals (AM) were absent from his OSR. This action took five months to complete; not timely processing. However, noting the Air Force's assessment that the correct duty title was reflected on his OPR covering the contested period and therefore, available to the selection board members, and finding no persuasive evidence that this discrepancy in and of itself, caused his nonselection for promotion, we agree with the Air Force that SSB consideration was not warranted.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389

    Original file (BC-2003-02389.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02455

    Original file (BC-2004-02455.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Contrary to the evaluation’s assertion, his request is timely filed. Exhibit B. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02455 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01494

    Original file (BC-2006-01494.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01494 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 16 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be updated with inclusion of his corrected Officer Performance Report (OPR) and duty history and he be considered for promotion to the grade of major by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03462

    Original file (BC-2005-03462.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03462 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) prepared for the Calendar Year 2005A (CY05A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be corrected to include his Officer Performance Report (OPR),...