RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01012
INDEX CODE: 111.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the lieutenant
colonel selection boards from 1977 to 1983.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His completion of Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) in November 1977 may
not have been available for evaluation by any of the promotion boards from
1977 to 1983.
In support of his request, applicant provides a copy of HQ AFPC/DPPRSP
letter dated 19 June 2003, correcting his DD Form 214 to reflect the
completion of ACSC in November 1977. The applicant’s submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 May 1983, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired in
the grade of major effective 1 June 1983. He was credited with 20 years
and 24 days of total active duty service for basic pay and active service
for retirement.
Applicant was considered and nonselected for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel by the CY78 (21 August 1978), CY79 (20 August 1979), CY
80 (21 July 1980, CY81 (2 February 1981) and CY82 (26 July 1982).
On 19 June 2003, after a review of his available military personnel record,
the Separation Procedures Branch, corrected the applicant's DD Form 214 to
reflect the completion of ACSC in November 1977.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. DPPPO provides OSBs as
evidence that an error did not exist in the applicant's record when it met
the respective promotion boards. DPPPO states that since the applicant
retired on 31 May 1983, he was not eligible to meet the CY83 (28 November
1983) board. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 9 July 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant asserts that his completion
of Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) in November 1977 may not have been
considered for evaluation by the 1977 through 1983 lieutenant colonel
selection boards. However, it appears that his ACSC completion was, in
fact, reflected on his Officer Selection Briefs beginning with the CY78 and
ending with the CY82 lieutenant colonel selection boards. In our opinion,
the Air Force office of primary responsibility has adequately addressed his
contention and we are in agreement with their assessment of his case.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence by the applicant that refutes the Air
Force evaluation of his case, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 August 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-01012
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Mar 04 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 30 Jun 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00567
Her commander chose to remove her from attendance with prejudice based on her performance under his command which was within his purview as her commander and documented in her record. Additionally, states DPPPO, since the citation for the MSM, 2 OLC, was filed in her Officer Selection Record, a notice was placed in her record indicating the decoration was missing; therefore, the board members were aware of its existence and it was factored into their promotion evaluation. While it appears...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03777
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. DPPPO advises the applicant was a nonselect for these boards and had be been removed from a list, a copy of the removal would have been a permanent part of his master personnel record. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect the grade of lieutenant colonel.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02876 INDEX CODE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Mar 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY06A (13 March 2006) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be corrected to explicitly reflect that his in-residence...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02605
Applicant’s records were administratively corrected to reflect the following awards on his DD Form 214, dated: 1) Awarded the BSM, Special Order G-3337, dated 17 Aug 04. Therefore, they were not authorized to be on the officer selection brief (OSB) and he was not entitled to a Special Selection Board. The applicant previously requested a correction of his records and was granted an SSB in Apr 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01216
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO states the completion of ACSC is not a requirement for promotion to lieutenant colonel. To this date, the applicant has not completed ACSC. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a statement saying that she would like the board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01976
The special orders for each of the awards the applicant wants included in his OSR for the CY02B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board were published sometime in 2003, after the date the board convened. The applicant notes that AFI 36- 2803, paragraph 3.4.2 states that the effective date of all decorations is the closing date of the service period, regardless of the order date and concludes that his decorations did exist prior to his promotion board. Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated...
A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit D. 2 97-00143 * APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that the Air Force instructions referenced by DPPPO were not followed as stated but found to be within the law by a Judge in the United States Court of Federal Claims. JA stated that on the merits of the case, applicant has failed to (1) articulate a rationale as to how or why the Air Force failed to follow the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02455
The AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Contrary to the evaluation’s assertion, his request is timely filed. Exhibit B. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02455 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01061
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After correcting errors in his military record, he was retroactively promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel in Jun 83, he was given a date of rank as though selected by his original board, and as part of that board process, augmented into the Regular Air Force. However, because of the length of time it took to correct his records, he was not able to build a record as a lieutenant colonel to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03681
The officers being considered by these promotion boards have OPRs with different closeout dates. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Jan 05, for review and comment within 30 days. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR 2004-03681 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...