Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03742
Original file (BC-2005-03742.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03742
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  10 June 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded an Air Force medal and campaign ribbon for his temporary
duty (TDY) to Pakistan from 30 August 1973 to 28 September 1973.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served on a mission in Pakistan and should be awarded an Air  Force
medal and campaign ribbon for his support of the mission in 1973.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214,
a copy of a  TDY  order  to  Karachi,  Pakistan,  and  four  character
references.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on  23  February  1971
for a period of four years.  He was promoted to the grade of  sergeant
on 1 December 1972.  His primary AFSC was fuel specialist.

While assigned to the 314th Combat Support Group, Little Rock AFB,  he
served in Karachi, Pakistan, for 30 days.

He was honorably discharged from the Air Force on 9  April  1974.   He
served 3 years, 1 month, and 17 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR states that the Directorate  of  Assignments  verified  the
applicant’s TDY to Karachi,  Pakistan,  from  30  August  1973  to  28
September 1973.  However, there is no authorized campaign  ribbon  for
Pakistan during the time the applicant  was  TDY.   Furthermore,  they
were unable to find evidence of a recommendation for, or award of  any
AF medal during his TDY to Pakistan.  Therefore, they recommend denial
of the applicant’s request.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states that he has not been able to  locate  any  source  of
support data.  He can only state that they  were  informed  that  they
would receive some sort of recognition for their mission.  He  states,
it would be sufficient if his  DD  Form  214  would  be  corrected  to
reflect his tour to Pakistan in August 1973.

Applicant's  complete  response,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt it’s rationale as the basis  for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   We  note
there is no authorized campaign ribbon for Pakistan  during  the  time
the applicant was TDY.  We further note that DPPPR was unable to  find
evidence of a recommendation for, or award of any AF medal during  his
TDY to Pakistan.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought  in
this application.

_________________________________________________________________




THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 21 March 2006, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
                 Ms. Debra Walker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Mar 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, undated.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 06.
      Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 8 Feb 06, w/atchs.




                             JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC2006-03165

    Original file (BC2006-03165.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03165 INDEX CODE: 107.00 LESLEY D. RHODES COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 7, Airman Military Record, be corrected to reflect the following: Item 5. However, his AF Form 626, reflecting temporary duty (TDY) in connection with his award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02277

    Original file (BC-2007-02277.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02277 INDEX CODE: 100.07, 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), credit for Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam, completion of J60 Engine formal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02774

    Original file (BC-2006-02774.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be eligible, a member must serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days, although those time limitations may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial as they were unable to verify entitlement to any awards during applicant’s 11 days of service in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide TDY vouchers, flight orders, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02709

    Original file (BC-2005-02709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examiner’s Note: HQ AFPC/DPPPR indicated the applicant’s records show she is entitled to the Army GCM and a DD Form 215 - Correction to the DD Form 214 will be issued to the applicant. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record there is no indication in the applicant’s military personnel record that shows she is entitled to award of the VSM. The Board notes that AFPC/DPPPR indicated the applicant is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03134

    Original file (BC-2006-03134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his 100-mission certificate, dated 19 Jan 72, was filed in his personnel records to reflect the additional combat sorties. The AF Form 11 is an obsolete form that cannot be updated, but the applicant’s 100-mission certificate has been filed in his personnel records as proper credit for the additional combat sorties. Neither the applicant’s records nor his submission provide convincing evidence he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM 4OLC.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc2006-03718

    Original file (bc2006-03718.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03718 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JUNE 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect receipt of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the NCO Professional Military Education (PME) Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMEGR), and the Small Arms Expert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02780

    Original file (BC-2005-02780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02780 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for service in Vietnam, award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for service in Vietnam in Oct 69 and award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02707

    Original file (BC-2006-02707.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02707 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 11 MARCH 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Longevity Service Ribbon (AFLSA) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). On 19 September 2006, during a records review, Headquarters Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00245

    Original file (BC-2006-00245.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03269

    Original file (BC-2006-03269.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under this Act, which lifted the time limitations on submitting award recommendations, veterans who may make a case for award consideration (or upgrade of a previously awarded decoration) not previously eligible because of these time limits, may now submit for award consideration. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record along with the applicant’s submission, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopts...