Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02826
Original file (BC-2005-02826.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02826
            INDEX CODE:  111.05

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  YES

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  17 APR 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing out on  1  September  2002  be
declared void and removed from her records.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The report contains a wrong Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC).  She  was
discriminated against because she worked in  a  career  field  dominated  by
men.  Her reporting official was changed twice within a two-month period  in
order to coerce an officer to sign the  document.   The  reporting  official
was forced into writing the low rating by the commander, based on a  request
from a chief master sergeant who planned to accuse  the  reporting  official
of being a lesbian in order to get her discharged.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  in  the  grade  of  airman
basic for a term of 4 years.  She was progressively promoted  to  the  grade
of master sergeant and retired in that  grade  after  serving  18  years  of
active duty service.











Her EPR profile reflects the following:

      PERIOD ENDING    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL

          13 Nov 88          9
          13 Nov 89          9
           1 Sep 91          4
          *1 Sep 92          3
           1 Sep 93          4

* Contested report

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPP recommends changing the DAFSC  but  denial  to  voiding  the  EPR.
DPPP indicated the applicant failed to  provide  any  supporting  documents.
Her surrounding reports show an AFSC of 45722.   The  applicant  states  she
was in a career field that she was not trained or assigned to.  It was  only
assigned to her to give her a lower rating.  She failed to provide proof  of
this information.

According to DPPP, based on the surrounding EPRs showing a DAFSC  of  45772,
the DAFSC should be changed to read “45772”.  However, the  DAFSC  does  not
invalidate  the  report.   The   incorrect   DAFSC   does   not   mean   the
accomplishments  on  the  report  were  not  accurately  documented  by  the
evaluators.   Therefore,  the  report  is  an  accurate  assessment  of  the
member’s performance.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  6  Jan
06, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice.  The  applicant  contends  the  DAFSC
was assigned to her in an effort to give her a  lower  rating  on  her  EPR.
However, after thoroughly reviewing the  evidence  of  record,  we  are  not
persuaded that the contested report should  be  declared  void  and  removed
from her records.  We note the applicant  has  not  submitted  any  evidence
showing the report was not an accurate assessment of her accomplishments  as
rendered.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and  recommendation  of  the
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the  basis  for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

4.    Notwithstanding  the  aforementioned,  we  note  that  the  office  of
primary responsibility recommended the contested EPR be changed  to  reflect
a DAFSC of 45772, based on the surrounding EPRs showing a  DAFSC  of  45772.
We agree with the office  of  primary  responsibility  in  this  matter  and
believe  that  the  DAFSC  on  the  contested  EPR  should   be   corrected.
Accordingly, we recommend that  her  records  be  corrected  to  the  extent
indicated below.

5.    The applicant's case is adequately documented  and  it  has  not  been
shown that a personal appearance with or  without  counsel  will  materially
add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.  Therefore,  the  request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show  that  the  Senior  Enlisted  Performance
Report (MSgt through  CMSgt),  AF  Form  911,  rendered  for  the  period  2
September 1991 through 1 September 1992,  be,  and  hereby  is,  amended  in
Section IV, DAFSC, by placing “45772” rather than “70230”.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2005-
02826 in Executive Session on 19 April 2006 under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Michel J. Novel, Member
                 Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member







All members voted to correct the  record,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Sep 05.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPP, dated 27 Dec 05.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 06.



                                   CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                   Panel Chair

AFBCMR BC-2005-02826




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation  of  the  Air  Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of  Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXX, be corrected to show that the Senior Enlisted
Performance Report (MSgt through CMSgt), AF Form 911, rendered for the
period 2 September 1991 through 1 September 1992, be, and hereby is,
amended in Section IV, DAFSC, by placing “45772” rather than “70230”.








  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00313

    Original file (BC-2005-00313.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The second was a report closing 30 September 2004, in which the Promotion Recommendation was “5” and the evaluations of his performance were all “firewall” ratings. DPPP states the applicant filed an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Reports. We believe any doubt in this matter should be resolved in favor of the applicant and conclude that the contested report should be removed from his records, and he should be given supplemental promotion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100364

    Original file (0100364.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the Article 15 was finalized after the closeout date of the EPR, the fact remains he received the Article 15 and signed for it before the report closed out. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY AFBCMR 01-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02650

    Original file (BC-2005-02650.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He retired from the Air Force on 31 Jul 03. DPPP states he was time-in-grade eligible for senior rater endorsement based on the new DOR at the time of the 30 Sep 01 report. In this respect, we note that based on the applicant’s original 1 Jun 01 date of rank (DOR) to the grade of senior master sergeant, he was ineligible for promotion consideration to the grade of chief master sergeant prior to his 31 Jul 03 retirement.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00603

    Original file (BC-2005-00603.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rater of the contested EPR was a colonel assigned to the HQ USAF/SGT as the IHS Program Manager. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant advises she filed MEO and IG complaints but her complaints were dismissed. MARTHA J. EVANS Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00603 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02880

    Original file (BC 2013 02880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a letter dated 7 Apr 14, the applicant’s Primary Care Manager (PCM) stated that it was evident that the Synthroid regimen was being adjusted when the applicant failed her now one remaining FA failure on the AC measure. The complete FAAB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for removal of her referral EPR for the period through 16 Jun 11. In this respect, we note the applicant provides a letter dated 7 Apr 14, from her PCM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-02368-2

    Original file (BC-2005-02368-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Mar 06, the Board considered and denied his request after finding that he had not provided the evidence necessary to substantiate the value of a senior rater endorsement (Exhibit F). However, his statement appears to be based primarily on his personal opinion that the applicant should have received a senior rater endorsement. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 10 July...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100016

    Original file (0100016.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/Special Actions Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, also reviewed this application and states that based on the applicant’s date of rank for master sergeant, the first time the report will be considered for promotion will be cycle 02E8 to senior master sergeant (promotions effective Apr 02 - Mar 03). A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03969

    Original file (BC-2006-03969.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant submitted copies of an excerpt of AFI 36-2406; AFPC/DPMM memorandum dated 11 April 2006; Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) letter dated 16 December 2005; two Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) letters dated 16 December 2005; Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) Decision; proposed EPR closing 14 January 2005; contested EPR closing 14 January 2005; Meritorious Service Medal documents; and EPR closing 14 January 2006 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02809

    Original file (BC-2003-02809.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommended denial noting that the applicant filed an Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) request, which was denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 26 Sep 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02715

    Original file (BC-2011-02715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02715 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Form 911, Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) (MSgt thru CMSgt) rendered for the period 30 September 2009 through 29 September 2010, be amended in Section VII (Reviewer’s Comments), line 3, to reflect his enlisted stratification of “#3 of...