RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00883
INDEX CODE: 110.03, 130.00
XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 FEB 2007
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated on active duty with back pay and promotion to the
next higher grade.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was forced to retire based on an improper diagnosis and due to
the lack of proper training and experience; race, equal opportunity
and age.
Applicant’s complete submission, w/attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Prior to the events under review, applicant served on active duty
in the US Navy and was transferred to the US Navy Reserve on
9 Jul 71. He was credited with 3 years, 11 months and 28 days of
active duty service. He was in the inactive Naval Reserve until
his discharge on 11 Jul 73. Applicant was in civilian status from
12 Jul 73 – 23 Apr 80. He served in the Army National Guard from
24 Apr 1980 – 23 Apr 1981. He was again in civilian status from
24 Apr 81 – 28 May 85. Applicant entered the US Navy Reserve on
29 May 85 and actively participated until his discharge in Jun 94.
On 29 Jun 94, he enlisted in the US Air Force Reserve for a period
of six years in the grade of staff sergeant. He was promoted to
the rank of technical sergeant, with an effective date and date of
rank of 1 Jan 00.
Applicant completed a Reserve Component Health Risk Assessment
(RCPHA) in Apr 02, he reported being treated with antidepressant
medication for depression for the prior six months triggering a
medical review and Line of Duty Determination (LOD). Prior to Apr
02, applicant denied medical or psychological problems on military
medical examinations (including a 1999 FAA Exam). In Dec 02, he
was disqualified from continued participation in Reserve duty or
training pending a fitness review. He underwent a comprehensive
psychiatric evaluation in Mar 03, leading to a diagnosis of
Dysthymic disorder with current symptoms in substantial remission
on medication.
An LOD was completed finding the applicant’s chronic condition to
be non-duty related. Review by medical authorities at HQ ARPC/SG
concurred with the conclusions of the psychiatry evaluation and the
applicant was determined to be unfit for continued reserve duty due
to his LOD-No condition.
On 9 Jun 04, he was honorably transferred to the Retired Reserve
awaiting pay at age 60. He was credited with 21 years, 11 months,
and 28 days of satisfactory service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/DPZ reviewed this application and recommended denial.
Based on documentation provided by the applicant he did retire from
the Air Force Reserve in part due to having a condition that made
him physically disqualified for active duty. As a result, he was
afforded the opportunity to voluntarily retire from the USAFR and
he elected to do so. HQ AFRC/DP and SG concurred with this
response.
The HQ AFRC/DPZ complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 28 Oct 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended denial. A review of the
applicant’s civilian health records indicated onset of depressed
mood beginning around May 00 diagnosed as Dysthymic Disorder.
Review of his Reserve point summary finds no periods of extended
active duty of 31 days or more; he was disqualified from continued
participation in Reserve duty or training pending fitness review.
Applicant underwent comprehensive psychiatric evaluation on
24 Mar 03 that included review of his civilian mental health
records, psychological testing, and psychiatric interview leading
to diagnosis of Dysthymic disorder with current symptoms in
substantial remission on medication.
A formal LOD was completed finding the applicant’s chronic
condition to be non-duty related. Review by the medical
authorities at HQ ARPC/SG concurred with the conclusions of the
psychiatry evaluation and the applicant was determined to be unfit
for continued reserve duty due to his LOD-No conditions. Applicant
appealed the unfit decision to the Formal Physical Evaluation Board
(FPEB) on 1 Apr 04. In testimony, he contended he was fit for
continued Reserve duty. He testified he had been taking Effexo
since 1996 without problems and had been performing his duties.
The FPEB found the applicant unfit for continued military service.
The BCMR Medical Consultant complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 8 Aug 06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case. The applicant is requesting reinstatement to active duty
with back pay and promotion to the next higher grade. Applicant
completed a RCPHA in Apr 02, after reporting being treated with
antidepressant medication for depression for the prior six months
triggering a medical review and LOD. Prior to Apr 02, applicant
denied medical or psychological problems on military medical
examinations. Applicant was subsequently disqualified from
continued participation in Reserve duty or training and found unfit
for continued military service by the FPEB. The applicant’s case
has undergone an exhaustive review by the BCMR Medical Consultant
and there is nothing in the evidence provided by the applicant that
would overcome his assessment of the case. We therefore agree with
the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has
failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either an error or
injustice. Hence, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-00883 in Executive Session on 26 September 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPZ, dated 20 Oct 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 05.
Exhibit E. BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 8 Aug 06.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 Aug 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03128
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement; and copies of training orders, personnel brief, medical records, and numerous memorandums/letters/e-mails concerning his FFD evaluation, PEB findings, and his administrative discharge. DPZ states the administrative LOD paperwork, filed in the applicant’s military medical records, documents his head injuries on 8 April 2004 and indicates he inflicted the injuries upon himself. The DPPD evaluation, with attachments,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00062
He was eventually diagnosed with an Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and on 25 August 2006 a LOD determination was completed with the finding that his condition existed prior to service (EPTS) thus making him ineligible for medical retirement. The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for continued military service and determined his condition was EPTS; however, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) determined the applicant was unfit for duty but...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01937
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was discharged from the Air Force as a result of Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) findings. STATEMENT OF FACTS: In a letter dated 7 February 2014, the FPEB determined the applicant was unfit to perform the duties of her office, grade, rank, or rating based on her diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Bronchiectasis. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00342
Between 1998 and 2001 prior to his activation, his civilian physicians had treated his Anxiety Disorder with various medications. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPM recommends granting Item A by awarding the applicant 10 active duty pay and points for the 1-10 Feb 04 TDY to Lackland AFB, TX, because he should have been on active duty orders at that time. Based on the available documentation, the Consultant concludes the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02357
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available records, the applicant served on active duty, from 13 Oct 82 to 29 Oct 92 and was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. They must have eight years of active service and have been on active duty orders for more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as subsequently determined by the PEB, and meet all other requirements set forth under the law and governing Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01668
The applicant was serving on active duty orders for more than 30 days, and the Air Force was required by law to continue him on active duty orders. The applicant served on active duty continuously from 2004 until 9 Oct 09, the date of his removal from active duty. The Counsel's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant relief by changing...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03317
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; medical records, letters of support, and other various documents associated with his request. Thus none of these conditions are In the Line of Duty (ILOD) as applied to Air Force disability retirement. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03709
There was no disabling or disqualifying issue; therefore no requirement for a Medical Evaluation Board existed. AFI 36-3212 allows for a reserve member to be retained in the reserves and returned to duty even though he may have a medical condition that requires some restrictions. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered BCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03709 in Executive Session on 28 June 2012 and on 11 July 2012, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00064
The Board further noted that after the applicants injury in Germany, he was returned to full duty after receiving occupational therapy, and that his recent injury happened during civilian employment, and therefore was EPTS. The second injury to the members wrist occurred in civilian status in 2005, and is therefore not service connected. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Line of Duty (LOD) Determination documents be placed in her medical records in order for the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process to continue. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...