RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01028
INDEX CODE: 108.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 SEPTEMBER 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her honorable discharge be suspended until the Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB) status is complete and she receive incapacitation pay and back pay
for the time she was unable to work.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was mobilized in April 2003 and was injured and then deactivated while
undergoing an MEB. The MEB is incomplete since her medical care was not
completed. She has been unable to work because of her injuries.
In support of her request, applicant provided a copy of her Reserve Order
AN-002863, congressional correspondence and copies of her medical records
with other associated documents. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Prior to the period of service under review, the applicant served as an
enlisted member of the Regular Air Force from 7 February 1991 until 5 April
2000. On 19 October 2001, applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve for
a period of 2 years. On 9 April 2004, she was honorably discharged in the
grade of staff sergeant (E-5) for expiration term of service. She was
credited with 11 years of satisfactory Federal service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the available medical records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The ARPC/SG recommends denial. ARPC/SG states that the MEB was completed
through return to duty by the Secretary of the Air Force. If the member
needs further treatment for her condition which was found to be "In Line of
Duty,” she is entitled to seek care either at any military treatment
facility or at the Veteran’s Administration Hospital. ARPC/SG advises that
since the MEB process has been completed, the applicant should not be
reinstated to the active Reserve and back-pay is not applicable. The
ARPC/SG complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends a change of records to show
disability discharge with severance pay for residuals of cervical spine
surgery following an appropriate period of time for treatment while
receiving incapacitation pay. The BCMR Medical Consultant advises the
applicant was continued on active duty status for care and fitness
evaluation under Partial Mobilization until November 30, 2003 (as
recommended by her neurosurgeon to complete post-operative care) and
immediate transition to MPA status (active duty with full pay and benefits)
through resolution of her fitness for duty determination (found fit for
duty 6 January 2004, and released from MPA 31 January 2004) consistent with
the applicable Air Force Reserve Instruction, Department of Defense and Air
Force policy. The applicant was formally evaluated in the Disability
Evaluation System for her cervical spine disease and received a permanent
disposition of return to duty and given an assignment limitation code at
the discretion of Reserve medical authorities. The MEB process was
complete. The BCMR Medical Consultant advises that the medical records
clearly reflect completion of treatment (both conservative, pre-operative,
operative and post-operative care) and timely post-operative follow-up for
her cervical spine condition. It was not until after completion of the
disability evaluation for her cervical spine disease and proper release
from active duty that the applicant complained of and was diagnosed with a
shoulder condition and later underwent surgery. Prior to this time, there
was no documentation of a shoulder condition that warranted retention on
active duty for evaluation, treatment and consideration in the Disability
Evaluation System. The BCMR Medical Consultant opines that the evidence of
the medical record indicates that the shoulder was not separately unfitting
warranting a compensable rating following surgery. However, the
preponderance of the evidence supports consideration for change of records
to show disability discharge with severance pay for residuals of cervical
spine surgery following an appropriate period of time for treatment while
receiving incapacitation pay. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete
evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the applicant on 26 June
2006 for review and comment. As of this date, this office has not received
a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice warranting a correction to her record to show a
recommendation for disability discharge with severance and incapacitation
pay. After reviewing the evidence of record, the BCMR Medical Consultant
opines that the preponderance of the evidence of record indicates that her
right shoulder condition may have been duty limiting while she was on
active duty but not properly recognized due to the severity of her neck
condition and it was not until after the recovery from her neck surgery
that the shoulder condition was diagnosed. Having seen no evidence that
would lead us to believe to the contrary, we agree with the BCMR Medical
Consultant that the applicant’s residuals of cervical spine disease status
post surgery was unfitting for military service at the time of the original
disability evaluation and remained unfitting for military service. In
addition, since the applicant continued to receive medical care beyond 9
April 2004 with a good outcome documented by service medical records ending
April 2005, we believe she should receive incapacitation pay for this
period of time. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected to the
extent indicated below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. She was not honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 9
April 2004, but continued to serve in the Selected Reserve.
b. Competent authority approved incapacitation pay effective 1
February 2004 to 8 April 2005.
c. On 9 April 2005, she was found unfit to perform the duties of her
office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability, incurred
while she was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in her case
bilateral C6-C7, C5-C6 radiculopathy DVA diagnostic code 5243, rated at
10%; that the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or willful
neglect; that the disability was not incurred during a period of
unauthorized absence; and that the disability was received in the line of
duty and not as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an
instrumentality of war.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-01028
in Executive Session on 26 July 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The following
documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2005-01028 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/SG, dated 8 Apr 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 22 Jun 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 26 Jun 06.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01028
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that:
a. She was not honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve
on 9 April 2004, but continued to serve in the Selected Reserve.
b. Competent authority approved incapacitation pay effective 1
February 2004 to 8 April 2005.
c. On 9 April 2005, she was found unfit to perform the duties
of her office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability,
incurred while she was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in
her case bilateral C6-C7, C5-C6 radiculopathy DVA diagnostic code 5243,
rated at 10%; that the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or
willful neglect; that the disability was not incurred during a period of
unauthorized absence; and that the disability was received in the line of
duty and not as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an
instrumentality of war.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00343
The MEB forwarded only one condition; “Cervical spondylosis and multilevel degenerative disk disease with previous radicular and myelopathic signs.” The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the chronic radiating neck and shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00557
At the time of his discharge, the cervical and lumbar spine conditions were the only conditions felt to be unfitting. On review of service medical records, the range of motion in the cervical and lumbar spine best correlates to a 10 percent disability rating for each at the time of discharge, using the Veterans Administrative Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01368
On 24 November 2004, he was notified he would not be reenlisted in the ANG and that his AGR tour would end concurrent with his date of separation of 6 April 2005. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommended denial. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 May 07 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 07.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2004-141
On September 12, 2002, a medical note indicated that the applicant was fit for duty. Under current law and service policy, the Coast Guard must presume that members with approved retirement requests are medically fit for retirement unless their medical condition makes them physically unable to perform in their assigned duties or the condition is found to be BCMR Final Decision for Docket No. (1) of the PDES Manual, the medical evidence provided by the applicant and available to the Coast...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00719
His treatment included medications, physical therapy, subacromial and nerve root injections, and three arthroscopic surgeries, without significant improvement. The PEB rated the shoulder condition as a muscle injury IAW §4.73, while the VA used §4.71a to rate the condition for impairment of the clavicle or scapula. These conditions likely contributed to the CI’s overall shoulder impairment, however, and are considered in the Board’s recommendations.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00010
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), §4.40 (functional loss) and §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding) the Board recommends disability ratings of 20% coded 5299-5293 for the cervical spine fusion and arm pain (radicular) condition and a separate 10% rating for the shoulder pain condition coded 5099-5003, and no other unfitting or ratable conditions. In the matter of the chronic pain, right shoulder...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00805
The PEB adjudicated the right upper extremity weakness and pain condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of DoDI 1332.39 and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Strength was normal in both upper extremities, and was symmetric bilaterally. Board members agreed that the evidence clearly supported the VA’s approach to rating the condition and that the preponderance of evidence indicated that the radiating pain symptoms did not warrant a separate...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00463
The migraine and cubital tunnel syndrome conditions, as requested for consideration, meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting chronic neck and upper back pain condition. The PT examination used in the NARSUM was performed 10 months prior to separation and only 3.5 months after the CI’s second surgical procedure to her neck. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01954
Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam HNP, C6/C7 5243 10% HNP, C6/C7 5237 10% 20040209 Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 10% Lumbar Disc Disease at L3-L4 5242 10% 20040209 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 2 20040918 Combined: 20% Combined: 20% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Cervical and Lumbar Spine Condition: The CI had an insidious onset of neck and LBP with radiation to the left arm and left hip, respectively. The examiner diagnosed severe cervical thoracic pain with...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01319
Chronic neck pain continued and she was referred for a MEB.At the MEB examination (3 months prior to separation), the CI reported“spasms in her neck and flares in her neck pain,” with “herniated discs in my neck which are irreparable.”She reported that “load bearing equipment and Kevlar headgear worsen her neck pain.”The Report of Medical History (DD Form 2807) for the MEB reported the presence of herniated discs with “no surgery.”The MEB physical exam noted surgical scars on the right palm...