Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03105
Original file (BC-2005-03105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03105
            INDEX NUMBER:  108.00
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  None

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  No


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  11 Apr 07


______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His total active service as indicated in Block 22 on his DD  Form  214
be changed from 3 years, 5 months, 1 day to 4  years,  11  months,  12
days.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The statement of service on his DD Form 214 only addressed the time he
was on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and not his  total
time attached to the Air Force.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 8 Nov 67.  On 12
Mar 71 a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the  applicant  with
electrical burns to the scalp and right distal  foreleg  resulting  in
chronic  intermittent  headaches  and  insomnia.   The  applicant  was
referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for further  evaluation.
A PEB convened on 16 Mar 71 and diagnosed the  applicant  with  severe
burns of the scalp, treated with multiple  surgical  procedures.   The
PEB determined the condition not to be permanent and  recommended  the
applicant be placed on the TDRL.  The  applicant  concurred  with  the
recommendation and was placed on the TDRL effective 9 Apr 71.  At  the
time the applicant entered the TDRL, he had 3 years, 5 months,  and  1
day of total active service.   After  the  required  periodic  medical
evaluation while on the TDRL,  a  PEB  recommended  the  applicant  be
discharged with severance  pay.   The  applicant  concurred  with  the
recommendation.   The Secretary of the  Air  Force  Personnel  Council
approved the applicant’s removal from the TDRL effective  20  Oct  72.
The applicant was discharged on  20  Oct  72.   At  the  time  of  his
discharge, the applicant was paid severance pay based on  3  years,  5
months, and 1 day of active service.  The applicant’s total  years  of
service for basic pay was 4 years, 11 months, and 13 days.

______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  The applicant
was released from active service and placed on the  TDRL  effective  9
Apr 71.  He was issued a DD Form 214 at that time.  The  DD  Form  214
only shows a member’s active duty time.  Time spent on the TDRL is not
active duty time.  When a member is removed from the TDRL,  a  new  DD
Form 214 is not issued; rather, the member receives  a  special  order
indicating his final status.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4
Nov 05 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a response has
not been received.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  Therefore, in the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2005-
03105 in Executive Session on 7 December 2005, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
      Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
      Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPD, dated 25 Oct 05,
                w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 05.




                                   KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03250

    Original file (BC-2005-03250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Dec 71, the Air Force PEB recommended that the removed from the TDRL and returned to active duty. For this condition to qualify for CRSC, it must be specifically granted by the DVA as presumptive to Agent Orange exposure. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01381

    Original file (BC-2004-01381.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Dec 72, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged without P&R, and that he be issued a DD Form 257AF, General Discharge Certificate. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 May 04. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002202

    Original file (0002202.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He remained on the TDRL until 4 Feb 88, at which time he was permanently retired with a 50 percent disability rating. On the second examination, the PEB diagnosed him with Agoraphobia with panic attacks, with a severe industrial impairment and recommended that he be permanently retired with a 50 percent disability rating. In DPPD’s view, the applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show he was improperly rated or processed under the provisions of military disability...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02386

    Original file (BC-2003-02386.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02386 INDEX NUMBER:136.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect that he completed over 20 years of active service. He remained on the TDRL until he was permanently retired for disability effective 14 Apr 71, with a disability rating of 80%. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02619

    Original file (BC-2003-02619.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02619 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The requirement of 20 years of service be waived so that he may be eligible for the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. ___________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01197

    Original file (BC-2005-01197.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Feb 02, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended the applicant be placed on the TDRL with a disability rating of 30% for PTSD with major depression. An 18 Aug 03 Narrative Summary revealed she continued to experience ongoing neurovegetative signs and symptoms of depression and breakthrough PTSD symptoms with frequent flashbacks of her father’s death. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03843

    Original file (BC-2003-03843.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant states a review of his service medical records and personnel records finds no documentation or references to the incident he states caused his heart disease. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03899

    Original file (BC-2006-03899.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03899 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUNE 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His medical retirement for permanent physical disability be changed to reflect he retired with twenty years of active duty. By letter dated 25 Apr 72, applicant’s commander indicated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03102

    Original file (BC-2005-03102.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After consideration of the applicant’s statement, the applicant’s squadron commander recommended to the wing commander the applicant be discharged for the reasons stated above, that he be given a general discharge, and that he not be given probation and rehabilitation. The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. While we note that the applicant received favorable ratings on the last EPR he received, we also note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02474

    Original file (BC-2004-02474.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 25 Jan 74. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPRFQ, dated 6 Oct 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.