RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965
INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow
eligibility to reenter the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training
program was his fault and he regrets it.
He was told that he could reapply for reenlistment after 180 days.
However, when he attempted to return to active duty, his recruiter
told him that his RE code rendered him ineligible to enlist. The
recruiter further informed him that because of his high test scores,
he would qualify for several critical vacancies in the Air Force.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement and
additional documents associated with the issues cited in his
contentions. These documents are appended at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 9 Dec
98 for a period of 6 years.
On 1 Jul 99, applicant was notified by his commander and advised that
involuntary discharge action had been recommended against him for
unsatisfactory performance. Specifically, the commander indicated the
action was recommended because of his failure to make satisfactory
progress in a required training program. The applicant elected to
waive his right to counsel and did not submit a statement in his own
behalf. The discharge authority reviewed the recommendation for
discharge and approved the commander’s request. He was honorably
discharged on 22 Jul 99 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208
(Unsatisfactory performance). He had completed 7 months and 14 days
and was serving in the grade of airman basic (E-1) at the time of
discharge. He received an RE Code of 2C, which defined means
"Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level
separation without characterization of service".
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the applicant did
not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that
occurred in the discharge processing. Additionally, the applicant
provided no facts warranting a change in his narrative reason for
separation or a change in his separation code. Accordingly, DPPRS
recommended the applicant’s records remain the same and his request be
denied. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C.
The Special Programs and AFBCMR Manager, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, stated that
the RE Code of 2C is correct (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and indicated that he was
never informed during any of the counseling, including his commander’s
counseling checklist, that a Bar to Reenlistment was part of his
discharge. He requests additional information be provided concerning
his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended at
Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, provided copies of the
requested discharge documentation at Exhibit G.
The Special Programs and AFBCMR Manager, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, stated that
the applicant’s RE code was determined by the type of discharge. On
22 Jul 99, the applicant was involuntarily discharged for
unsatisfactory performance and received an honorable discharge. RE
code 2C appropriately reflects this type of discharge and is the code
applied to others of the same circumstance. DPPAES stated that RE
code 2C does not “bar” enlistment; however, it does disqualify an
individual for immediate entry into active duty without a waiver of
the RE code. Applicants apply for enlistment waivers through their
local recruiter and are considered by HQ Air Force Recruiting.
Waivers to RE codes are considered and approved to meet Air Force
recruiting requirements/goals. If the decision is to grant the relief
sought, DPPAES indicated that the Board should direct an RE code of 3K
(Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the AFBCMR when no other reenlistment
eligibility code applies or is appropriate). A complete copy of this
response is appended at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and indicated that an
airman should be told during discharge counseling what RE code will be
given and what it means. A complete copy of this response is appended
at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. We note that for the period of time
applicant served in an active status, the reason for the discharge
action was due to his below average test scores while in technical
training. In addition, we note that during his short term in the Air
Force, the applicant was not involved in any misconduct or
disciplinary action. The RE code 2C, issued in conjunction with his
honorable discharge, reflects the Air Force position regarding whether
or not or under what circumstances an individual should be allowed to
reenlist. The RE 2C is not a waiverable code. Since his discharge,
the applicant wishes to reenter the armed forces and we believe that
he should be given the opportunity to apply for enlistment. While the
RE code may have been appropriate at the time of applicant’s
separation, we believe it would be an injustice for him to continue to
suffer its adverse effects. Therefore, we recommend that the RE code
2C be changed to 3K, a code which can be waived for prior service
enlistment consideration. RE code 3K is reserved for use by the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), so that he
may apply for enlistment based on the needs of the service. We
therefore conclude that the applicant’s records should be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code, issued in conjunction with his honorable
discharge on 22 July 1999, was “3K.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 June 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Henry Romo Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Albert F. Lowas Jr., Member
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Oct 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 21 Nov 00.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, dated 29 Nov 00.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 15 Dec 00.
Exhibit F. Letter from applicant, dated 15 Dec 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 20 Feb 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 2 Apr 01, w/atch.
Exhibit I. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Apr 01.
Exhibit J. Letter from applicant, dated 2 May 01, w/atchs.
HENRY ROMO JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-02965
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code, issued in conjunction with his honorable
discharge on 22 July 1999, was “3K.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the applicant was released from active duty on 15 Oct 96 with an honorable characterization of service after serving 9 years and 2 months. However, if the Board wishes to grant the applicant relief they recommend changing his code to 3K “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate.” A...
On 16 Apr 98, he was honorably discharged in the grade of airman (E-2) under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (unsatisfactory performance), with a separation code of “JHJ”. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is appended at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Education and Training Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAT, stated that after reviewing the applicant’s request, reconsideration of his separation code should be approved. RICHARD A....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02644 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to “3A” to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air Force Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01354 INDEX CODE: 100.06 . Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s RE code of 2C be changed to one requiring a waiver; that is, RE-3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02887
Based on the circumstances of his discharge, they found no evidence or injustice; therefore, applicant’s RE code is correct. HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in discharge processing. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Special Programs & AFBCMR Manager, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, also evaluated the case and explains why they corrected the applicant’s RE code from “3A” to “2N.” However, if the relief sought is granted, then the author recommends the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K” (“Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the AFBCMR when no other RE code applies or is inappropriate [sic].” [The definition for “3K” provided by DPPAES is incorrect because that meaning...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02992
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. AFPC/JA stated that the applicant’s arrest record could have been a basis for rejecting him from Air Force service. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation for fraudulent entry based on...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02083 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H be changed to 1J, which defined means “Eligible to reenlist, but elects separation.” RE Code 4H is defined as “Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military...