RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01610
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: WILLIAM D. PURNELL
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 NOVEMBER 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The son of the widow of the former retired member, appointed Power of
Attorney on her behalf, is requesting corrective action that would
entitle her to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His mother has and currently suffers from a mental disability.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of her medical
records, correspondence between her attorney and the government, a
copy of the former member’s military records, a copy of the complaint
and order filed with the US Court of Federal Claims, and a copy of the
deceased former member’s death certificate.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The former member, a reservist, and M--- were married on 11 February
1950 and he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) spouse only coverage
based on full retired pay (immediate annuity) when he became eligible
to receive retired pay except for attaining age 60. The former member
became eligible to receive retired pay on 14 August 1981 and he died
on 9 November 1990. There is no evidence M---, the applicant, or any
other person responsible or concerned for this widow’s well-being
submitted an annuity claim within the six-year time limit.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRT states that the Barring Act limits payment of SBP annuities
to those claims received within six years of the participant’s death.
Although the applicant provided medical documents signed by Dr. J---
M. C--- showing that M--- has significant mental problems, a Power of
Attorney to handle her affairs was not obtained until 1999, nine years
after the former member’s death. The claim for late payment,
previously reviewed by the deputy general counsel at the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service - Denver Center (DFAS-DE) reported in
their 20 August 2002 opinion that there is no authority to waive the
six-year statute of limitation. It is reasonable to assume that the
applicant has, or should have had the capacity to seek information and
applied for the SBP annuity in a timely manner. Therefore, they
recommend denial of the applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 1 July 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D).
Attorney for the applicant provided a letter dated 22 July 2005
stating to hold the applicant’s mother to the same standard as an
individual without any legal disability is unjust and unconscionable.
Moreover, they find it disingenuous for DPPRT to imply that by making
the correction to the military records of the former member, the Board
will be setting aside the Barring Act, because 28 U.S.C. 2501 gives
the Board the opportunity to prevent this unjust ruling. Furthermore,
it is important to note that the former member had previously paid for
the survivor benefits and therefore it is inequitable for the military
to deny these benefits at this time. Also, the applicant’s mother was
not informed by the military of the need to file any paperwork to
claim these benefits, nor was she aware that they even existed. The
applicant’s mother’s condition constitutes a legal disability as
described in 28 U.S.C. 2501, and therefore they respectfully request
that she be deemed entitled to the survivorship benefits which have
accrued since the former member’s death and for future benefits.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant states it is unlikely that the applicant’s
mother knowingly decided to forgo SBP benefits. Although it is likely
she did not file a claim either through ignorance of her entitlements
and/or neglect, the reviewer is of the opinion that the strength of
the evidence is sufficient to warrant consideration for the relief
requested. The applicant’s contention that mental disability
prevented her from filing a claim is plausible. Review of her medical
records prior to the time of her husband’s death and the few years
following his death finds evidence to corroborate the opinion of the
more recent psychiatric evaluation that she has had a chronic mental
illness characterized by irrational behavior, delusional and
disorganized thinking and impaired ability to manage her own affairs
since the time of her husband’s death. In addition to her chronic
mental illness, the applicant’s mother had significant recurring
medical problems necessitating repeated hospitalization and stays in
nursing homes that further disrupted her life and ability to attend to
anything more than her immediate needs. The BCMR Medical Consultant
is of the opinion that medical documentation supports the applicant’s
contention and favorable consideration is warranted.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 19 September 2005, a copy of the additional Air Force evaluation
was forwarded to the counsel for review and response within 14 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the
documentation submitted with this appeal, we are persuaded that mental
disability prevented the widow of the former retired member from
filing a claim for payment of the SBP. In this regard, the Board
concurs with the rationale of the BCMR Medical Consultant and
recommends granting the relief sought. Accordingly, it is our opinion
that the former member’s records should be corrected to the extent
recommended below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the deceased service member, be corrected to show that on
10 November 1990, his widow, M--- H---, submitted a claim for a
survivor benefit annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 27 October 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRT, dated 22 Jun 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 05.
Exhibit E. Attorney’s Response, dated 22 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 16 Sep 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Sep 05.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01610
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 10 November
1990, his widow, M--- H---, submitted a claim for a survivor benefit
annuity.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01301
The complete DPPRT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her undated and unsigned response, the applicant states that for her aunt not to apply for her SBP annuity speaks volumes. It appears documentation was filed to report her uncle’s death but the process for application of the SBP annuity was never completed. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03521
In support of her application, the applicant submits her personal statement, a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL), a letter from the Air Force Casualty Assistance office, a durable power of attorney, a letter from the annuity pay operations office, a verification for survivor annuity form (DD Form 2656- 7, a direct deposit sign up form, a withholding certificate for pension or annuity payments (W-4P), a claim for unpaid compensation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01655
A week after the divorce from her husband, she took the divorce decree to Offutt AFB to finish the paperwork for DFAS for the annuity of her former husband’s retirement. In support of her application, applicant provided personal statements from both her and her daughter, copies of her 2 Jun 01 letter to DFAS, a 2 Jun 01 letter to her former husband, their divorce decree, a certified letter to the Director of DFAS from her attorney, her former husband’s death certificate, and his retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02539
PL 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an 18- month enrollment period (21 Sep 72 - 20 Mar 74) for retired members to elect SBP coverage, but were not required to return an SBP election form in order to decline coverage. RSFPP participants could have terminated previous RSFPP coverage, or retained it in addition to a new SBP election. There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00641
With the help of his attorney, he prepared all the necessary documentation to properly claim the SBP entitlement and submitted this information to DFAS. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Her father enrolled in the SBP and subsequently elected maximum spouse and child coverage during an SBP open enrollment, and had a Helpless Child. Her mother predeceased her father by approximately...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03676
The member’s widow is eligible to receive an SBP annuity of $412, but she has not submitted an application to date. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. The widow of the service member indicated in a statement dated 25 Jan 06, that she recently completed and returned some forms sent to her by DFAS-CL.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02725
Applicant’s counsel requests copies of all documents by which the Air Force determined that her client gave inadequate notice of her entitlement to the SBP, of which benefits were awarded her (and paid for by her) pursuant to the divorce decree. Apparently the Air Force determined they received adequate notice to pay her client her portion of the court-ordered military retirement benefits, it appears incongruous for the Air Force now to take the position that such notice was inadequate to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00661
Her husband told her that if they signed for survivor benefits, the military would take out a large amount of money from his retirement. She did not know that for her to sign away the survivor benefit she and her children would not get any more of his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 July 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03282
There is no evidence the former member elected SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf during any of the subsequent three SBP_ open enrollment periods conducted prior to his 4 April 2005 death. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The widow of the former member provided a statement saying her husband was not notified that DFAS-CL was not authorized to honor his request....