RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-
03676
INDEX CODE: 137.04
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 JUNE 2007
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he
elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her former husband was negligent in not reporting when he was
divorced and filing the proper paperwork. She believes that when
establishing the SBP it was Congress’ intent to provide for those
spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his
or her military career. She supported her former husband and not
being able to receive the $300 she was use to receiving would
jeopardize her financial status. She was not aware of any military
documents that needed to be filed.
In support of her request, applicant provided a personal statement
and letter, a copy of her former spouse’s Certificate of Death, a
copy of their Marriage License and Decree of Divorce,
correspondence pertaining to former spouse entitlements from her
Senator, and a letter from a casualty assistance representative
from Moody AFB.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The Air Force indicated the member and the applicant were married
on 1 Jul 56 and the member elected spouse only coverage based on a
reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Sep 75 retirement. The
parties divorced on 29 Jul 83 prior to passage of Public Law 98-94
(24 Sep 83) which permitted retirees to elect the more expensive
insurable interest coverage for their former spouses. Although
unenforceable, the settlement agreement contained the member’s
agreement to maintain the SBP on the applicant’s behalf. However,
he did not elect former spouse coverage on her behalf during the
one-year (24 Sep 83 – 23 Sep 84) open enrollment. Defense
Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show that
the member remarried on 26 Apr 87, but he did not request that the
finance center establish SBP coverage on his new spouse’s behalf
within the first year following his marriage. The member’s retired
pay records erroneously reflected the applicant’s date of birth
(26 Oct 36) as the eligible spouse beneficiary and SBP premiums
were continuously deducted from his retired pay until his 3 Nov 05
death. The member’s widow is eligible to receive an SBP annuity of
$412, but she has not submitted an application to date.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRT indicates that since the request involves two
potential SBP beneficiaries, no recommendation is provided.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 8 Feb 06, the Air Force evaluation and two advisory opinions on
cases similar to the applicant’s were forwarded for her review and
comment within 30 days. (Exhibit C)
In response to the advisory opinions the applicant submits copies
of all the correspondence she received from DFAS. She reiterates
the fact that her divorce decree awarded her the benefits until she
either remarries or dies. She is 69 years old and retired. She
spent almost the entire years of his military service with her
former husband. She would like the Government to make sure that
military personnel are aware of the laws. She has never heard of
the documents that should have been filed out.
The applicant provided a copy of a 30 Dec 05 letter from DFAS
indicating that they received all the documentation needed to
establish her SBP annuity, an Annuitant Account Statement, dated 20
Jan 06, and a 26 Jan 06 letter from DFAS indicating that they have
identified an overpayment of her SBP annuity, specifically,
overpayment of entitlement from 1–31 Jan 06, in the amount of $412.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
The widow of the service member indicated in a statement dated
25 Jan 06, that she recently completed and returned some forms sent
to her by DFAS-CL. She now understands that the forms were for
filing for the SBP annuity. She states that she does not want the
SBP or the premium refund, and that it rightly belongs to her
husband’s former spouse. She is requesting the Board abide by her
husband’s wishes as he has stated to her that his former spouse be
awarded the SBP annuity. She requested that the Casualty Office
forward her letter to the AFBCMR and DFAS-CL (Exhibit E).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
Notwithstanding the opinions rendered by HQ USAF/JAA, after
thoroughly reviewing the circumstances of this case, it is our
opinion that the former spouse should receive the SBP annuity. We
note the widow has provided a statement relinquishing her
entitlement to the SBP. We are persuaded by the evidence presented
that it was the member’s intent to provide his former spouse the
SBP annuity and satisfied that his widow is fully aware she is
relinquishing her entitlement to the annuity. Therefore, we
recommend the records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 March 1986,
under the provisions of Public Law 99-145, he elected former spouse
coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan, based upon the previous
reduced level of retired pay, naming ---------------- as the former
spouse beneficiary.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-03676 in Executive Session on 15 June 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Nov 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPRT, dated 10 Jan 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, Widow, dated 25 Jan 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-03676
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [Member] be corrected to show that on 1 March
1986, under the provisions of Public Law 99-145, he elected former
spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan, based upon the
previous reduced level of retired pay, naming --------------------
as the former spouse beneficiary.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00962 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant is the ex-spouse of the deceased former servicemember, who requests her former late husband’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01626
If there were not a competing eligible beneficiary, or that beneficiary would consent to the change via a notarized statement, he would recommend correcting the record. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D The deceased member’s widow provided a notarized statement stating in part, that she and her deceased husband had an understanding that the ex-wife (who is the applicant), would receive the SBP benefits. KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2007-01626 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01199
Examiner’s Note: The law in effect at the time of the applicant’s divorce did not allow retired members to provide SBP coverage, even if they wished to voluntarily continue their former spouse’s eligibility. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response dated June 22, 2007, the applicant states her former spouse was very sorry and surprised when his request to name her his SBP beneficiary was denied. KATHLEEN...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01439
Had the member elected SBP coverage based on full retired pay, the monthly cost would have been approximately $157 at the time of his death and the annuity would have been no less than $1,335. Furthermore, the Air Force may not pay an SBP annuity to the applicant because the member retired before the implementation of the SBP and he did not choose to provide SBP coverage on her behalf. It is possible that since the premiums were still being deducted from the member’s retired pay after the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02559
The parties divorced on 7 July 1998, and the court ordered the former member to maintain the SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf; however, neither party submitted a valid election change during the required time. Specifically, as noted by the Chief, Administrative Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General, in his memorandum of 20 April 2004, on the subject, there are a number of court decisions by both state and federal judiciaries that have held that, despite the divorce decree...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01655
A week after the divorce from her husband, she took the divorce decree to Offutt AFB to finish the paperwork for DFAS for the annuity of her former husband’s retirement. In support of her application, applicant provided personal statements from both her and her daughter, copies of her 2 Jun 01 letter to DFAS, a 2 Jun 01 letter to her former husband, their divorce decree, a certified letter to the Director of DFAS from her attorney, her former husband’s death certificate, and his retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062
She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicants coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307
If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00568
Prior to the servicemember’s 1 October 1963 retirement, he was married and elected spouse and child RSFPP coverage, Option 4 - that allowed the member to terminate RSFPP premium payments in the event the beneficiary lost eligibility. We find no evidence he attempted to elect SBP coverage for the applicant during any of the four open enrollment periods provide by law. Regardless, it appears the servicemember made no attempt to elect SBP coverage for the applicant when he was eligible during...