RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00968
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 SEPTEMBER 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for replacement of household goods (HHGs) he was
required to sell or give away prior to his Permanent Change of Station
(PCS) move from Minot AFB, ND, to Eielson AFB, AK, in August 2004.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A Traffic Management Office (TMO) counselor provided incorrect
information regarding the maximum weight allowance of HHGs authorized
for shipment at government expense for his pending PCS. He was
informed the total authorized weight of HHGs he could ship was 700
pounds. He also asked his superiors and co-workers and they indicated
there was a weight limit for overseas locations. Relying on the
misinformation, he was required to dispose of most of his property
prior to PCS.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copies of DD Form
1797 (Personal Property Counseling Checklist), w/atch, his claim
submitted to Eielson’s Legal Office and their denial of the claim,
emails and replacement appraisals. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
reveals the applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date
(TAFMSD) as 2 October 2001. He is currently serving on active duty in
the grade of senior airman (E-4), with an effective date and date of
rank of 2 October 2004.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
JPPSO-SAT/ECAF states that members in the grade of E-3, with
dependents, are authorized a weight allowance of 8,000 pounds. As the
PCS destination was outside of the CONUS, he was entitled to ship the
entire weight allowance to the new permanent duty station (PDS) or a
combination of shipping part of the weight allowance to the new PDS
and placing the remainder in non-temporary storage (NTS) for the
duration of the OCONUS assignment. Since the request is a claim for
reimbursement not involving items shipped as HHGs, it should be
addressed within the Staff Judge Advocate channel. The HQ JPPSO-
SAT/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
HQ AFLSA/JACC recommends the application be denied. JACC states that
upon receipt of this appeal, the General Claims Division (JACC)
initiated an investigation into the situation. Inquiries were
forwarded to the supervisors of the applicant and the applicant
himself to obtain additional information. The applicant’s statement
that he questioned the weight allowance with supervisors as well as
his first sergeant was not corroborated by either of the individuals
(refer to emails). JACC contacted (via email) the two supervisors and
the first sergeant mentioned in applicant’s statement and all three
deny the applicant had questioned his weight allowance with them.
They did confirm the applicant did indeed give away or sell a majority
of his possessions.
JACC indicates that after arriving at Eielson AFB, AK, the applicant
filed a claim to recover money he deemed lost due to the disposal of
his property based on his initial misinformation from TMO. The claim
was denied as such a loss is not cognizable under the PCA. The
applicant then filed a reconsideration request with the claims office.
He provided no additional evidence to support his claim, therefore,
the reconsideration was denied. Upon receipt of the AFBCMR appeal,
JACC contacted the applicant for further information; specifically,
substantiation of ownership and the condition of the items claimed at
the time of the purported disposal. The applicant could not provide
the substantiation as requested.
JACC states the applicant did indeed receive misinformation about a
700 lbs. weight allowance for the movement of HHGs due to PCS.
However, had he inquired about this misinformation up the chain-of-
command as alleged, it is likely this situation would have been
clarified. The fact he did not act as stated is, in JACC’s opinion,
the proximate cause for the disposal of his property. Based on the
applicant’s uncorroborated statements, his failure to properly
question his options through the chain-of-command and his decision to
dispose of the property on his own, JACC finds no basis for any
payment to the applicant.
The HQ AFLSA/JACC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATIONS:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 29
July 2005 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
circumstances of this case, it appears the applicant was provided
erroneous information on his PCS weight allowance entitlement. In
this respect, we note the Personal Property Counseling Checklist (DD
Form 1797), dated 29 July 2004, reflects a 700 PCS weight allowance,
which gives credence to the applicant’s claim. Although the
applicant’s assertion of querying his superiors and co-workers
regarding the weight limit for overseas locations is unsupported, we
find it inconceivable that he would have disposed of his personal
items, a decision so detrimental to him, if he had not discussed it
with other members of his organization. We can easily understand how
the applicant, after being counseled, had every reason to believe that
the information he was provided concerning his total authorized weight
of household goods (HHGs) was correct. Based on the inaccurate
information provided and in order to remove any possibility of an
injustice to the applicant, his records should be corrected to the
extent indicated below, which factors in the maximum weight allowance
(8,000 pounds) minus the net chargeable weight shipped (588 pounds)
totaling 7,412 pounds times a $3.50 Full Replacement Value (FRV) and
deducts the FRV purchase price ($322.96).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, in conjunction with
his permanent change of station from Minot Air Force Base, North
Dakota, to Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, under Special Order AF-
0823, dated 27 June 2004, he made a Government Bill of Lading (GBL),
Code 1, household goods shipment. The shipment had a net weight of
7,412 pounds and he purchased Full Replacement Valuation (FRV)
protection. The entire shipment was lost or destroyed and he is
entitled to FRV at $3.50 times the net weight of the shipment.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 8 September 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-00968.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, JPPSO-SAT/ECAF, dated 3 May 05.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLSA/JACC, dated 27 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 05.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-00968
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, in conjunction
with his permanent change of station from Minot Air Force Base, North
Dakota, to Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, under Special Order AF-
0823, dated 27 June 2004, he made a Government Bill of Lading (GBL),
Code 1, household goods shipment. The shipment had a net weight of
7,412 pounds and he purchased Full Replacement Valuation (FRV)
protection. The entire shipment was lost or destroyed and he is
entitled to FRV at $3.50 times the net weight of the shipment.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01947
DD Form 2278, Application for DITY Move and Counseling Checklist, dated 9 Dec 05, indicates the applicant advised the transportation office at Pope AFB he had an estimated weight of 500 pounds to ship to Eielson AFB, AK. Since transportation personnel are without authority to authorize a member to ship more weight than what is authorized by regulations, it is doubtful they would advise the applicant he could transport the excess weight himself and be reimbursed for doing so. We noted the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02029
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03809
He shipped HHGs under Government Bill of Lading (GBL) JP-611238 with a net weight of 13,760 pounds. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01823 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The excess unaccompanied baggage (UB) costs for shipment of his household goods (HHG) be corrected to eliminate costs of professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&E) and the remaining excess costs...
Therefore, at the time of his PCS the member’s weight allowance for the shipping of HHGs was 4,225 pounds, plus 1,100 pounds of UB. There has been no evidence submitted to show that he informed the destination site that his shipment exceeded the weight allowed for the shipping of his HHGs, nor did he request to have his shipment reweighed. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
Using the cube rule, ECAF increased the weight for professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&G), from 50 pounds to 960 pounds for the unaccompanied baggage (UB) shipment and credited 457 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items for the household goods (HHG) shipment that moved from Germany to England. JPPSO/CC indicates the applicant submitted an amendment to his original application in which he states he made another PCS move from England back to Germany and he was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00839
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC/DE recommends denial and states after contacting the Remissions and Waiver Branch for a recommendation, that office notified them had they received the applicant’s remission request prior to his separation, they would have recommended the debt be collected in full. Applying this method to the fourth shipment produced a net weight of 3,120 pounds (78 inventory times 40 pounds), at a cost of...
The shipment had an origin net weight of 16,345 pounds. According to JPPSO, the applicant did not provide any information to support an error or injustice by transportation personnel that increased the weight of his HHG. At origin, the shipment had a net weight of 16,370 pounds.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entitlement to ship his non-temporary storage (NTS) from Arkansas to Germany be reinstated. Applicant is now in receipt of Special Order AD-013221, dated 8 November 2009, authorizing separation from the Air Force effective 24 June 2010, with...