RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00839
xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 SEP 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His debt of $5,332.13 be remitted and all monies that have been
collected be refunded.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There was an error made in computing the weight amount of his
household goods (HHG) storage/shipment, which showed him in excess of
his allowable weight limit. Packers used excessive packing material
in his shipment from Japan and heavy rains added additional weight to
the shipment.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a Letter from the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), DD Form 2789,
Waiver/Remission of Indebtedness Application, a Letter to DFAS from
Applicant, background information pertaining to his household goods
shipment, a copy of his Retirement Orders, and DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant made a permanent change of station (PCS) move from
Misawa AB, Japan, to Tinker AFB, OK. He made four shipments of
personal property in conjunction with his PCS. A shipment of HHGs
with a net weight of 12,544 pounds moved from Japan to Oklahoma. A
shipment of unaccompanied baggage (UB) moved from Japan to Oklahoma.
It had a net weight of 1,110 pounds. A shipment of HHG with a net
weight of 2,306 pounds moved from Baltimore, MD to Oklahoma. A fourth
shipment of HHG moved from Jacksonville, FL to Oklahoma with a net
weight of 4,700 pounds.
The applicant was billed $5,332.13 for exceeding his authorized weight
allowance of 12,500 pounds. Upon retirement, $2,445.70 was collected
from his final pay leaving a balance of $2,886.43.
On 7 July 2005, he submitted a request for waiver of indebtedness to
the DFAS. DFAS advised him that his HHG shipment debt is ineligible
for waiver consideration in accordance with Transportation Debt
Waivers, 67 Comp. Gen 484 (1988). DFAS also advised him that although
they could not process the waiver, he may apply for a correction of
military records requesting that the waiver application be treated as
a request for remission.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DFAS-POCC/DE recommends denial and states after contacting the
Remissions and Waiver Branch for a recommendation, that office
notified them had they received the applicant’s remission request
prior to his separation, they would have recommended the debt be
collected in full. Based on the evidence, there has not been an error
or injustice.
A complete copy of DFAS-POCC/DE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
JPPSO-SAT/ECAF recommends approval. JPPSO states when the shipment
arrived at destination, an inspector reviewed the contents of the
shipment and estimated the weight at 3,500 pounds. When it is
impossible or impractical to weight a shipment, under guidance by the
Comptroller General, the weight of a shipment may be constructed by
multiplying 40 pounds times the number of inventory line items. The
shipment contained 78 line items. Applying the constructive method
would produce a net weight of 3,120 pounds (78 inventory items times
40 pounds). This tends to indicate there may have been a problem with
the officially recorded weight of this shipment.
A complete copy of JPPSO evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 9
June 2006 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
available evidence, we are sufficiently persuaded that corrective
action is warranted. The Board notes an inspector reviewed the
contents of the fourth shipment (GBL ZY-954,481) and determined an
error was made in computing the weight. We are not inclined to
provide the total relief requested by the applicant. However, based
on current Air force policy, when it is impossible or impractical to
weigh a shipment, the carrier industry and the Government accepts a
constructive weight by multiplying 40 pounds times the number of line
items in the shipment. Applying this method to the fourth shipment
produced a net weight of 3,120 pounds (78 inventory times 40 pounds),
at a cost of $2,835.88 rather than $3,729.73, which provides the
applicant partial relief. In regards to the applicant’s contention
the packers in Japan used excessive packing material and the contents
were water damaged due to heavy rains, no evidence has been presented
to substantiate the his claim and that portion of his request is
denied. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant's records be
corrected as set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he applied for a
remission of his indebtedness of $5,332.13, incurred as a result of
the excess costs incurred by the Government in the shipment of his
household goods, and his request was partially approved in the amount
of $893.85 by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-00839 in Executive Session on 20 July 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 30 Mar 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, JPPSO-SAT/ECAF, dated 31 May 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jun 06.
LAURFENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00839
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 31 March 2005, he
applied for a remission of his indebtedness of $5,332.13, incurred as
a result of the excess costs incurred by the Government in the
shipment of his household goods, and his request was partially
approved in the amount of $2,886.43 by competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXX Docket Number BC-2006-00839
I have carefully considered all the circumstances of this case and
agree with the AFBCMR panel that partial relief is warranted with respect
to the applicant’s request that his debt associated with the shipment of
his household goods be remitted. However, while I am not inclined to
provide the total relief requested by the applicant, I believe further
relief is warranted.
The Joint Personal Property Shipping Office (JPPSO) states there may
have been a problem with the officially recorded weight of one of the
applicant’s shipments. For this reason, they support the applicant’s
request for remission of the balance of the debt and I support their
recommendation wholeheartedly.
In arriving at my decision, I considered the JPPSO recommendation and
the inspector’s determination that a problem existed with one of the
applicant’s shipments. Furthermore, in deference to his overall military
record and recognition for his over 22 years of honorable service to our
country, I direct his remaining debt in the amount of $2,886.43 be
remitted.
JOE
G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AFBCMR BC-2006-00839
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he applied for
a remission of his indebtedness of $5,332.13, incurred as a result of
the excess costs incurred by the Government in the shipment of his
household goods, and his request was partially approved in the amount
of $893.85 by competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
The shipment had an origin net weight of 16,345 pounds. According to JPPSO, the applicant did not provide any information to support an error or injustice by transportation personnel that increased the weight of his HHG. At origin, the shipment had a net weight of 16,370 pounds.
Using the cube rule, ECAF increased the weight for professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&G), from 50 pounds to 960 pounds for the unaccompanied baggage (UB) shipment and credited 457 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items for the household goods (HHG) shipment that moved from Germany to England. JPPSO/CC indicates the applicant submitted an amendment to his original application in which he states he made another PCS move from England back to Germany and he was not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101138C070208
Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. The applicant’s request for cancellation or remission of the debt he incurred as a result of a shipment of excess weight was carefully considered. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s HHG shipment exceeded his authorized weight allowance.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02860
The shipment had a net weight of 19,220 pounds. Regulations require that PBP&E be separately packed, marked, and identified as such on the shipping documents in order to receive credit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02029
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02970
ECAF states when it is impossible or impractical to weigh a shipment on certified scales, if approved by the traffic management officer, the shipment weight may be constructed by multiplying 40 pounds times the number of inventory line items. The ECAF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force advisory opinion, the applicant points out that there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03906
When a member declares PBP&E and the carrier fails to record and weigh the items, credit may be given if the traffic management office (TMO) documents the items and weight upon delivery. Review of the applicant’s HHG inventory and other shipping documents reveal that no items were identified as PBP&E during the shipment in question. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00115 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Mandatory Case Completion Date: 11 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His indebtedness to the government as a result of the excess weight of his household goods (HHG) shipment be eliminated and he be reimbursed the monies collected. In support of his request,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011724
As he was authorized to ship 18,000 lbs of HHG, he exceeded his authorized weight by 6,700 lbs and incurred a debt of $8,183.18. The PPSO must request a reweigh for shipments exceeding the JFTR weight allowance. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was properly notified on 24 September 2010, when his HHG were picked up from his residence in Virginia, that his HHG had a total net weight of 28,680 lbs.