Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00503
Original file (BC-2005-00503.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-00503
            INDEX NUMBER:  136.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED: NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  15 AUG 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her late husband be entitled to benefits under  the  Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) program.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She is requesting CRSC benefits on  behalf  of  herself  and  their
daughter.  The deceased military member passed  away  from  combat-
related problems.  She loved her late husband very much and  stayed
with him from 1989 until  2001.   She  states  that  she  left  him
because of his nightmares; he would wake up screaming so loud.   He
enjoyed the Air Force and retired as an E-7.

In support of her late husband’s appeal, she submitted  a  personal
statement; a copy of his CRSC application; a Statement of  Service,
dated, Jul 84; DD Forms 214,  dated  27  Sep  73,  4  Jul  77,  and
15 Oct 84; a copy of the deceased member’s death  certificate,  and
supporting statements  from  the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs
(DVA).

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The former member’s name was placed on the TDRL  effective  15  Oct
84.  At that time, he had completed 15 years, 7 months, and 10 days
of active federal military service.  He was permanently retired for
disability effective 25 May 86, with a disability  rating  of  60%.
He died on 22 Jul 02.

___________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial  of  applicant’s  request  stating,  in
part, the veteran died on 22 Jul 02, prior to implementation of the
program; therefore, compensation is not  warranted.   CRSC  is  not
subject to any survivor benefit provisions of Chapter 73, Title 10,
United States Code.

The Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program, established
by Public  Law  (PL)  107-314,  provides  compensation  to  certain
retirees with combat-related disabilities.  A retired member of the
Uniformed Services must meet each of the four following  conditions
to meet the preliminary CRSC criteria:

      a.  Has 20 or more years of active service in  the  Uniformed
Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or
is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10,  United
States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that
same title.

      b.  Is in retired status.

      c.  Is entitled to retired  pay,  notwithstanding  that  such
retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans
Affairs (DVA) disability compensation.

      d.  Has qualifying disability ratings (percentages)  [retiree
must be entitled to compensation for service-connected disabilities
under 10 USC 38 by the DVA].

             Qualifying  Combat-Related  Disability:   Member   has
combat-related  disabilities  (which  includes  any  Purple   Heart
disabilities) that are compensated by the DVA.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 22 Apr 05 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
00503 in Executive Session on 12 October 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPDC, dated 20 Apr 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Apr 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01865

    Original file (BC-2005-01865.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the death of her husband, she became aware that his disability rating had been increased to 40% and applied for CRSC benefits on his behalf. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 05. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01865 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04418 ADDENDUM

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial of the applicant’s request for an increase in her deceased husband’s CRSC rating to 100 percent, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. As for her request related to his cysts, we also do not find the evidence she has presented sufficient to conclude that his CRSC rating should be increased based on this condition. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02608

    Original file (BC-2012-02608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02608 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be able to sign the DD Form 2860, Application For Combat – Related Special Compensation (CRSC), on behalf of her deceased husband. On 27 April 2009, according to information provided by the applicant, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) advised the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01893

    Original file (BC-2004-01893.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01893 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to show that he was eligible to receive Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits from the date the CRSC program was established until the date of his death. He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01631

    Original file (BC-2005-01631.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qualifying Combat-Related Disability: Member has combat-related disabilities (which includes any Purple Heart disabilities) that are compensated by the DVA. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01544

    Original file (BC-2005-01544.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He retired after 19 years and 9 months of active duty service under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, a review of veteran’s personnel files shows that he is currently not eligible for compensation under CRSC since he did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01551

    Original file (BC-2005-01551.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, although the veteran states he is rated at 100 percent disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), a review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) files and Air Force Military Personnel files indicates the veteran did not retire from military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01420

    Original file (BC-2004-01420.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that the 100% disability rating assigned by the Army Retirement Board at the time of his retirement from the Army in 1945 should be equated to a 20- year length of service retirement and qualifies him for consideration in the program. The fact that he was disability retired with a 100% rating does not qualify him for compensation under the CRSC program. The applicant does not qualify for compensation under the CRSC program because he did not serve 20 years on active duty, he has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02362

    Original file (BC-2003-02362.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02362 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His approved Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) payment be adjusted to include compensation for his 100 percent unemployability. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01770

    Original file (BC-2005-01770.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, applicant’s personnel files show that he is currently not eligible for compensation under CRSC since he did not serve 20 years or more of active duty. Additionally, applicant retired in 1995, several years before the establishment of the CRSC program. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number...