RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00071
INDEX CODE 107.00, 100.06
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Jul 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1983 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code
be upgraded so that he can reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During the period in question, he was going through a separation and
subsequent divorce. His wife had removed funds from their checking account
without his knowledge and he did not know he was writing bad checks. He
was emotionally unstable and most of his absent without leave (AWOL)
periods were the result of his being found in bed after he was supposed to
be on duty. Since his discharge, he had only two major legal problems: the
first was a driving-under-the-influence (DUI) and the other was a breaking-
and-entering (B&E) that he changed his mind about after he started.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Jan 01 for a period
of four years. He was assigned to the 57th Aircraft Generation Squadron at
Nellis AFV, NV as a unit tactical aircraft maintenance specialist.
Medical entries indicate, on 31 Aug 81, Social Actions (SA) referred the
applicant for evaluation of alcohol and drug use. He had been experiencing
trouble sleeping. Sep 81 entries reflect the applicant’s wife had left him
about three months ago and, on 25 Sep 81, his commander referred him for
evaluation due
to emotional, marital, and legal problems and possible suicidal ideation.
The applicant had been undergoing psychotherapy without progress.
On 8 Oct 81, the applicant was admitted into the hospital due to depression
and suicidal ideation. On 28 Oct 81, he failed to report to the First
Sergeant’s office after being discharged from the hospital. The applicant
voluntarily returned to duty on 1 Nov 81.
On 15 Dec 81, he was stopped for having expired license plates and found to
have outstanding warrants for failure to appear on previous tickets. He
was incarcerated at the North Las Vegas Jail (NLVJ) pending trial. On 17
Dec 81, he was released from the NLVJ custody after being convicted of
several traffic violations. He was fined $805.00.
On 29 Jan 82, the applicant failed to report to his appointed place of
duty. On 2 Feb 82, he voluntarily returned to duty. On 16 Feb 82, he was
placed in civil confinement at the NLVJ for neglecting to pay fines from
previous arrests. He was released on 17 Feb 82, but did not report to
anyone in authority. His release was not known until 19 Feb 82; he was
administratively classified as a deserter due to pending action on the
previous AWOL.
On 11 Mar 82, the Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period 29 Jan 81
through 28 Jan 82, was referred to the applicant. He was marked down
severely in many performance factors and was given an overall rating of 1
(9 being the highest). The evaluators found the applicant’s performance,
attitude, and ability to conform to military standards sorely lacking. The
applicant did not contest the report.
On 15 Mar 82, the applicant requested emergency evaluation to discuss the
effects of illegal drug use over the weekend (hashish, alcohol, and other
unknown substances). The medical report noted the effects/symptoms
suggested hallucinogenics. The commander was contacted for drug screening.
On 10 May 82, a special court-martial (SCM) convened at Nellis AFB and the
applicant was tried for the following:
--Charge I, Violation of UCMJ, Article 123a, knowingly writing checks
with insufficient funds for the following 12 Specifications:
1. On 20 Jun 81, a check for $50.00 to the Nellis AFB
Exchange.
2. On 21 Jun 81, a check for $100.00 to the Exchange.
3. On 22 Jun 81, a check for $50.00 to the Exchange.
4. On 25 Jun 81, a check for $100.00 to the Exchange.
5. On 26 Jun 81, a check for $100.00 to the Exchange.
6. On 26 Jun 81, a check for $100.00 to the Exchange.
7. On 1 Sep 81, a check for $50.00 to an individual.
8. On 1 Sep 81, a check for $50.00 to an individual.
9. On 1 Sep 81, a check for $65.00 to an enlisted member.
10. On 1 Sep 81, a check for $50.00 to an enlisted member.
11. On 3 Sep 81, a check for $40.00 to an enlisted member.
12. On 15 Sep 81, a check for $40.00 to an individual.
--Charge II, Violation of UCMJ, Article 86, being AWOL and leaving
his appointed place of duty without authority on:
1. 1 Nov 81.
2. 15-17 Dec 81.
3. 29 Jan-2 Feb 82.
4. 16-22 Feb 82.
5. 9 Mar 82.
On Charge I, the applicant pled not guilty to all specifications. On
Charge II, he pled guilty to the first specification; not guilty to the
second, third and fifth specifications; and guilty to the fourth
specification except for the period 18-22 Feb 82, rather than 16-22 Feb 82.
On Charge I, the court found the applicant not guilty of the first through
sixth specification; guilty of the seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and
eleventh specifications; and guilty of the twelfth specification except on
19 Sep 81, rather than 15 Sep 81. On Charge II, the court found the
applicant guilty of the first through fourth specifications but not guilty
of the fifth specification.
Punishment was confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeiture of
$150.00 per month for five months, and a BCD. The sentence was adjudged on
20 May 82 and, following appellate processes, approved on 14 Jul 82.
The applicant was released from confinement on 24 Sep 82 and returned to
duty. On 8 Feb 83, the Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the
findings and sentence.
The applicant was separated in the grade of airman basic on 1 Mar 83, with
a BCD and an RE code of 2B (separated with less than an honorable
discharge), after one year, three months and nine days of active service.
Time lost for the following periods: 28-31 Oct 81, 15-16 Dec 81, 29 Jan-
1 Feb 82, 16-21 Feb 82, and 20 May 82-23 Sep 82.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS believes the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the
discharge authority’s discretion. The applicant has not substantiated any
errors or injustices and his appeal should be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 21 Jan 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
On 8 Feb 05, the AFBCMR Staff invited the applicant to submit post-service
information. On 3 Mar 05, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 20 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to waive the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we are not persuaded his BCD and RE code should be changed.
At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished
an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances
of their separation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we
believe that, given the circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s special
court-martial and the resultant BCD, the RE code issued was in accordance
with the appropriate directives. The applicant has not established to our
satisfaction that the actions taken against him were not driven by his own
misconduct. Further, according to the FBI report, the applicant continued
his misbehavior after his separation. Therefore, we conclude relief is not
warranted on the basis of error, injustice, or clemency.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 June 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-
00071 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Dec 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 Jan 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRB, dated 21 Jan 05.
Exhibit F. Letters, AFBCMR, dated 8 Feb & 3 Mar 05.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04082 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded. -- On 21 May 81, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to impose nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1984-04083A
On 13 Oct 83, his commander recommended discharge. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends, as a diabetic herself, that her husband’s elevated blood sugar episode was not properly followed up by the Air Force. Review of service and DVA medical records through 1992 show no evidence of diabetes, and evaluation by DVA physicians also indicate no...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1991-02293A
On 13 Oct 83, his commander recommended discharge. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends, as a diabetic herself, that her husband’s elevated blood sugar episode was not properly followed up by the Air Force. Review of service and DVA medical records through 1992 show no evidence of diabetes, and evaluation by DVA physicians also indicate no...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01197
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01197 INDEX CODE 100.06, 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect (1) a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that allows reenlistment, (2) additional time served, and (3) receipt of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the Expert...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02826 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 1 Aug 81, the applicant was counseled for failure to go. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF FBI...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded, indicating that nothing can change the facts or the past. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03806
On 11 Sep 80, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to vacate the suspended nonjudicial punishment because he again failed to report for duty at the appropriate time. The commander, on 14 Oct 80, determined that applicant was guilty of the offenses and imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture of $224.00 per month for two months, restriction to base for 45 days, and a reduction to the grade of airman basic, with a new date of rank of 14 Oct 80. He had completed a total of 2...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509
DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02867
On 24 Feb 97, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Based on his overall record of service, the contents of the FBI...