Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02380
Original file (BC-2004-02380.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02380
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  2 FEB 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, paralysis of lower radicular  nerve
group, be assessed as combat related in order to  qualify  for  compensation
under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He initially encountered his numbness and loss of  strength  while  using  a
torque wrench and tools for rocket heads and bomb fuses while  participating
in a combat related event in Thailand.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation  extracted  from
his medical records.   His  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  13
Aug 52.  He  was  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of  chief  master
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1
Sep 79.  He served as a Munitions  Maintenance  Technician.   Applicant  was
considered by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and his case was referred  to
an Informal Physical Evaluation Board  (IPEB)  with  a  diagnosis  of  motor
neuron disease.  On 22 Jan 82,the IPEB found him fit  for  further  military
service and recommended he be returned to duty.  On 11 Mar 82, a Formal  PEB
considered  his  case  and  directed  that  he  be  returned  to  duty.   He
voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 31 Aug 82, having served 31  years
and 18 days on active duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 26 Mar 04 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his paralysis of lower radicular  nerve  group  is  not
combat related.  His records show his motor neuron disease was diagnosed  as
early as April  1975  but  there  is  no  mention  of  how  this  disability
occurred.   CRSC  determinations  can  only  be  made  based  on   objective
documentary information in the records.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27  Aug
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
02380 in Executive Session on 13 Oct 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Aug 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01134

    Original file (BC-2004-01134.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 28 years and 13 days on active duty Current DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his paralysis of the ulnar nerve is not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970

    Original file (BC-2004-00970.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02939

    Original file (BC-2004-02939.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 25 Mar 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his neurosis and paralysis of ulnar nerve are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02648

    Original file (BC-2004-02648.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 May 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries, while not sustained by a bullet in a firefight, were incurred while in the same locations and ensuring helicopters were ready to perform their mission. We agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03621

    Original file (BC-2003-03621.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, line 10(b) is marked YES, as the disability did occur during a time of war in the line of duty. What the Air Force is telling him is that in no way an Air Force member can have a combat-related injury if they were medically retired and entered the Air Force prior to the date indicated on the form. DPPD states the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01969

    Original file (BC-2004-01969.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application an aircraft loss record, and witness statements. He served 21 years, 2 months, and 19 days on active duty Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his post-op residuals, left knee, has not been rated by the DVA as service connected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02178

    Original file (BC-2004-02178.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02178 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes mellitus and paralysis of sciatic nerve, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03782

    Original file (BC-2003-03782.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03782 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, paralysis of left ulnar nerve, limited flexion of knee, and left shoulder bursitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01938

    Original file (BC-2008-01938.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01938 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, invertebral disc syndrome be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. His medical records reflect he hurt...