Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01938
Original file (BC-2008-01938.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-01938
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  condition,  invertebral  disc  syndrome  be
reevaluated as combat-related in order to  qualify  for  compensation  under
the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His  injury  was  incurred  while  working  on  aircraft  performing  combat
missions during Operation Urgent Fury.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal  statement  and
documents extracted from his military records.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 17 Dec 80,  the  applicant  contracted  his  initial  enlistment  in  the
Regular Air Force.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  senior
master sergeant having assumed the grade effective and with a date  of  rank
of 1 Nov 99.  He was honorably retired on 1 Dec 01.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
70% disability rating for his service connected disabilities.

The applicant submitted  an  application  for  CRSC  for  impaired  hearing,
tinnitus,  inflammation  of  all  radicular  nerve  groups-right  upper  and
intervertebral disc syndrome.  His application was partially approved  on  9
Aug 07 for impaired hearing and tinnitus but was denied for inflammation  of
all radicular nerve groups-right upper  and  intervertebral  disc  syndrome.
He appealed the board’s decision and the appeal was denied  on  11  Sep  07.
No evidence was provided to show his back condition was the direct
result of armed conflict,  hazardous  service,  instrumentality  of  war  or
simulating war.
______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states there is no evidence  to  indicate
his invertebral disc syndrome was caused by  a  combat-related  event.   His
medical records reflect he  hurt  his  back  while  lifting.   Although  his
military  duties  were   strenuous,   conditions   developed   through   the
performance of normal service are not  usually  considered  combat  related.
In order for the applicant to  be  eligible  for  compensation  under  CRSC,
evidence must be provided to indicate his condition was caused by a  combat-
related event (such as the  concussion  of  a  bomb  blast)  rather  than  a
routine activity such as heavy lifting.

APFC/DPPD's complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant provided a letter from  his  physician  stating  that  he  has
degenerative changes and disc herniations at C4-C5, C5-C6, C6-C7 and  C7-T1.
 He had surgery on 7 Jun 07 for his C7-T1 disc  herniation.   His  physician
further states in looking at the MRI  it  is  difficult  to  date  the  disc
herniations and if his new MRIs were compared with the old  ones  and  there
were changes at the disc that required surgery  at  C7-T1  it  is  certainly
possible that the disc was injured at the time of the initial injury.

______________________________________________________________

BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:


1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The available evidence of record does  not
support  a  finding  that  the  service-connected  medical   condition   the
applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the  direct  result  of
armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the  performance  of
duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of  war;
and, therefore, does not qualify for compensation under the  CRSC  Act.   We
agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
01938 in Executive Session on 2 Dec 08, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 May 08, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 30 Jun 08.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 08.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Jul 08.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Aug 08, w/atch.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 15 Sep 08.
    Exhibit H.  Letter, Applicant, not dated, w/atch.



                                        THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                        Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01224

    Original file (BC-2008-01224.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01224 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition of intervertebral disc syndrome be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. His medical records reflect he...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01637

    Original file (PD 2012 01637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The InformalPEBadjudicated “C4-5 herniated nucleus pulposus and C6-C7 bulge with early myelopathy, status post foraminotomy, Aug 2000,” as unfitting, rated at 10%,with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings/recommendations, and requested Formal PEB (FPEB), who re-adjudicated the CI’s neck condition increasing the rating from 10% to 20%.The CI non-concurred with the FPEB findings/recommendations further appealed to the Air...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009744C070206

    Original file (20050009744C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has not submitted evidence that the diagnosis of back strain made on 13 September 1969 was in error. No such demonstration has been made in this case. Since the Board has no authority over the VA, there is no basis for considering this portion of the applicant’s request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03916

    Original file (BC-2008-03916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DVA award was 50 percent, his CRSC award was 40 percent with Special Monthly Compensation. In this respect, it appears that while the DVA increased his combined service-connected disability rating to 50 percent, the particular disability that has been determined combat-related remains rated at 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03094

    Original file (BC-2003-03094.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Up until that date, he never had any back problems. He contend his herniated discs were due to the 42 assault landings performed during the training flight; however, the preponderance of the medical evidence indicates the inciting event was picking up and installing a landing gear pin following the completion of a training flight. Therefore, if his injury had been incurred installing the pin then it should be considered during the performance of flight duties.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01535

    Original file (PD-2013-01535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01728

    Original file (BC-2006-01728.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01728 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Intervertebral Disc Syndrome, be reevaluated as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00805

    Original file (PD2011-00805.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the right upper extremity weakness and pain condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of DoDI 1332.39 and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Strength was normal in both upper extremities, and was symmetric bilaterally. Board members agreed that the evidence clearly supported the VA’s approach to rating the condition and that the preponderance of evidence indicated that the radiating pain symptoms did not warrant a separate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02861

    Original file (BC-2003-02861.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aerial flight is listed as hazardous service, this, his injury which occurred while performing required aircrew duties while onboard an aircraft, qualifies under the "engagement in hazardous service" for CRSC determination. The Medical Consultant states practice aircraft ground egress is not considered aerial flight and does not qualify as hazardous duty for purposes of CRSC eligibility. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01229

    Original file (BC-2008-01229.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, intervertebral disc syndrome, hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and peripheral vascular disease (right and left legs), be assessed as combat-related in order...