Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02358
Original file (BC-2004-02358.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-02358

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her uncharacterized discharge be changed to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:


The uncharacterized discharge is unjust because she did not lie on her
application.


In support of her request she provided a personal statement  from  her
father.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic  on
27 May 2003 for a period of 6 years.   The  applicant  was  discharged
with an entry-level separation with character  of  service  listed  as
uncharacterized on 20 June 2003 in the grade  of  airman  basic.   She
served 24 days of active service.

On 17 June 2003, the applicant was notified by her commander that  she
was recommending that she be discharged from the Air Force.  Basis for
the  commander’s  recommendation  was  that  she  received  a  medical
narrative summary indicating she did not meet  minimum  standards  for
enlistment into the Air Force.  Applicant should not have been allowed
to enlist in the Air Force because of asthma and she did  not  qualify
for a disability separation.

The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge on
17 June 2003 and waived her rights to consult with legal  counsel  and
submit statements in her own behalf.  The base legal  office  reviewed
the case and found it legally sufficient to support an uncharacterized
entry-level  separation.   The  discharge   authority   approved   the
discharge and directed  that  the  applicant  be  discharged  with  an
uncharacterized entry-level separation.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS   recommends   denial.   Airmen   are   given   entry-level
separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is
initiated in the first 180 days of  continuous  active  service.   The
Department of Defense determined if a member served less than 180 days
continuous active service, it would be unfair to the  member  and  the
service  to  characterize  their  limited  service.   Therefore,   her
uncharacterized character is correct and in accordance with Department
of Defense and Air Force instructions.

AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 24 November 2004, for review and comment within 30  days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  an  error  or  injustice  warranting  a  change  in  her
characterization of her separation.  In this respect,  we  agree  with
the Air Force that  an  entry-level  separation  with  uncharacterized
service is used in those cases where the member has not yet  completed
180 days of active service at the time  separation  proceedings  were,
for whatever reason, initiated.  Hence, an uncharacterized  separation
merely connotes the brevity  of  an  individual’s  membership  in  the
service and is not, in and of itself, viewed  as  a  defamation  of  a
former member’s character. Therefore, in  the  absence  of  persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2004-
02358 in Executive Session on 4 January 2005, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

      Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 04, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 23 Nov 04.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Nov 04.





      PATRICIA D. VESTAL
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200426

    Original file (0200426.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The RE code which was issued at the time of applicant’s separation accurately reflects the circumstances of her separation and we do not find this code to be in error or unjust. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct” from her narrative reason for separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02233

    Original file (BC-2004-02233.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed to an honorable discharge. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01314

    Original file (BC-2004-01314.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that same date, the discharge authority approved the entry-level separation with service uncharacterized. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAE found that the RE code 4C, “separated - failure to meet physical standards for enlistment…,” is correct. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02134

    Original file (BC-2002-02134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02134 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry-level separation for fraudulent entry be changed to a medical discharge. Applicant states that she never needed the inhaler and did not suffer another attack until the present time. He affirms that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00827

    Original file (BC-2007-00827.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. However, at the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. Additionally, the Board noted that airmen are given entry-level separation uncharacterized service characterization when a separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-00683

    Original file (bc-2004-00683.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 March 2004 for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected by deleting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03047

    Original file (BC-2003-03047.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03047 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to 1A, and her reason for discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to failure to adapt. Pursuant to the submission of this application and the opinion of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02560

    Original file (BC-2004-02560.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02560 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated to active duty or, in the alternative, be granted a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that will allow her to enter the Reserves. On 23 Jun 04, the CCQ recommended to the training...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02210

    Original file (BC-2004-02210.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 March 2004, he received a Letter of Counseling for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty. Evidence has not been provided in support of his appeal, which would lead us to believe that a change to his RE code is warranted. Absent persuasive evidence that the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled or that the appropriate standards were not applied during his discharge processing, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00098

    Original file (BC-2007-00098.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the remaining issue for consideration by the Board is the Narrative Reason for Separation _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: It was recommended that she be separated for a medical condition. On 30 March 2006, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend her for an entry-level separation for erroneous enlistment for the following reason: SF Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care dated 21 February...