ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02127
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) be changed from “Ineligible” to
“Eligible” so that he may reenlist in a branch of service of his
choosing.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 6 April 2005, the applicant's original request was considered and
denied by the Board. When he received his honorable discharge he was
told he would be able reenlist in any branch of the service he chose.
Nowhere in any paper was he ever told or made to believe he would not
be able to reenlist. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
On 18 January 2005, the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration. To support his request, he provides a personal
statement, and numerous documents relating to his career. His
application includes personal papers, medical records, military
service records and legal documents.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in
support of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that his record should be
changed to show him “Eligible” for reenlistment. We carefully
considered the applicant’s statements and documentation and while we
consider the evidence provided in support of his request to be new and
relevant, we do not find his argument so compelling as to alter our
original decision. The applicant has failed to sustain his burden of
having suffered either an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we again find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02070 in Executive Session on 10 November 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Mr. Patrick Dougherty, Member
Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 7 December
2004, with exhibits A through D.
Exhibit F. Letter from C/M Deal, dated
6 Jan 05, w/atchs.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02127
He transferred to the Army Reserve and on 23 February 1993, he was honorably discharged with over 14 years of service. Regarding applicant’s contention he was never told he would not be eligible for reenlistment, DPPI states he signed a Conditional Waiver Statement acknowledging the terms of his discharge to include the reenlistment eligibility entry of “Ineligible.” DPPI’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01401
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03761
The applicant does not offer evidence in support of the claim as required by AFI 36-2603, Air Force for Correction of Military Records, and AFP 36-2607, Applicant's Guide to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). The applicant did not participate in VEAP, therefore, does not qualify under the law to participate in VEAP or convert to the MGIB under the current statues. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00455
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Board should review her DD Form 214 to either accept or decline the change in her RE code. On 22 October 2004, the applicant received notification from her commander that she was being recommended for discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2005-00455 in Executive Session on 6 April 2005,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00793
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00793 INDEX CODE: 102.08 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be amended to reflect a correction to his service dates, to include his Date of Rank, Pay Date, Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD), and Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01365
DPPAE states the Air Staff announced release of the SRB list on 29 Mar 04, that would go into effect on 30 Mar 04. There is no way the Military Personnel Flight could have advised the applicant to wait until 30 Mar 04 to reenlist because no one knew when the Air Staff would release the new list. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03913
He recently separated and has been informed that he is still entitled to portion of the bonus for the time that he served. On 2 December 2003, the applicant signed and initialed Air Form Form 3008 (Supplement to Enlistment Agreement - United States Air Force) acknowledging he understood the terms and conditions of his enlistment agreement which did not include an initial enlistment bonus. In this respect, the Board notes at the time the applicant signed and initialed his enlistment...
He was told that by signing the form declining retraining he would still receive his promotion to staff sergeant but wouldn’t be able to test under future promotion cycles. During the involuntary retraining selection phase, personnel are allowed to submit available AFSC choices; however, the final decision is based on the needs of the Air Force as determined by the Headquarters Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC). As such, there was no error or injustice in applicant’s selection for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03098
He contends he received an Article 15 because of his temper. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant began his regular Air Force career on 30 April 1956. After consulting counsel, he waived his entitlement to appear before a discharge review board and requested discharge instead.