ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-03277
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to “1.”
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge on 12 February
2001 due to a personality disorder. An RE code of 2C was assigned, which
defined means “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or
entry level separation without characterization of service.” At the time
of his separation, he was credited with 6 months and 16 days of active duty
service.
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 1 May 2002. For
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see
the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F.
Inasmuch as the applicant’s current application, submitted through his
congressman, contains the same request which was previously considered by
the Board, it is being processed as a request for reconsideration of the
initial application. In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a
statement from a former co-worker. The applicant’s complete submission is
at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of the appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s reenlistment code
was erroneous or unjust. The applicant was recommended for separation
because of a condition that interfered with his ability to adjust to the
military environment. We have noted the complimentary comments contained
in the supporting letter submitted by the applicant. However, it does not
convince us that he has overcome the difficulties which he incurred as a
military member or that he could perform satisfactorily in the highly
structured, demanding military environment. In view of the above and
because his RE code accurately reflects the circumstances of his separation
at that time, we conclude that no basis exists upon which to recommend
favorable action on the applicant’s reconsideration request for upgrade of
his RE code.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 28 January 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Member
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 2 May 02,
with Exhibits.
Exhibit G. Letter from Member of Congress, dated 1 Dec 04,
with DD Form 149 and additional evidence.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00929 INDEX CODE 110.02 100.06 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her “2C” (Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge) reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one allowing reenlistment, and the narrative reason for her discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Failure...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01635
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On his Report of Medical History, dated 15 Nov 00, the applicant indicated he did not have asthma, was not on any medications, and had no known allergies. The case was found legally sufficient and the discharge authority directed the applicant’s entry-level separation for fraudulent entry into military service. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 9 Aug 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00608A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding her request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. On 27 Nov 06 and 2 May 07, the applicant’s requests for reconsideration of her application were denied because she did not provide evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration. See Exhibits G and H. On 1 May 08, the applicant provided additional documentation through her Congressional...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00324
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00324 INDEX CODE: 100.03 xxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED xxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 JUL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligible (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed to enable him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00016
Based on symptoms consistent with asthma and the bronchoprovocation test positive for abnormal bronchoreactivity consistent with asthma, he underwent entry level separation for the disqualifying diagnosis of asthma existing prior to service (erroneous enlistment: erroneous enlistment is one that would not have occurred had the relevant facts been known by the Air Force and it was not the result of fraudulent conduct on the part of the applicant). A complete copy of the evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02057
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his discharge from “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” to “Honorable,” his reentry code and narrative reason for separation should be changed to allow him to re-enter active military service. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. The DPPAE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. In this respect, it appears that the narrative...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00655 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation be changed from Personality Disorder to Hardship Discharge and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed. Although action and disposition in this case are proper and equitable...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-01997A
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. We took note of evidence found by the DVA indicating he was assigned to a unit that suffered a rocket...