Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01474
Original file (BC-2004-01474.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01474
            INDEX CODE:  128.14

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed for  the  amount  of  Family  Servicemembers’  Group  Life
Insurance (FSGLI) deducted from her pay.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While on temporary duty in October 2003, she completed paperwork to  decline
FSGLI coverage; however, the forms were never placed in her records and  she
does not have a  copy  of  the  forms.   As  a  result,  she  completed  the
paperwork again on 3 December 2003 at her home base.  She  is  still  paying
for the coverage.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade  of
master sergeant.

On 5 June 2001, the President signed into law approving Public  Law  107-14,
which was the enabling legislation for the FSGLI program.  FSGLI, which  was
implemented Department of Defense (DOD) wide on 1  November  2001,  made  it
possible for servicemembers to take out low cost insurance on  their  spouse
for up  to  $100,000  (premium  charged)  and  $10,000  life  insurance  for
dependent children (no cost) through the  Office  of  Servicemembers’  Group
Life Insurance.  The law mandated that  coverage  for  spouses  (to  include
military married to military couples) and dependent  children  automatically
go into effect on the date of implementation  so  long  as  the  member  was
insured under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program.

On 2 December 2003, the applicant completed an SGLV  8286A  declining  FSGLI
coverage.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommended denial.  They indicated the  applicant  declined  their
offer of a 30-day suspense to locate copies of her prior  declination  forms
or collect statements from the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) officials  in
support of  her  application.   In  accordance  with  public  law,  although
premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse  was
insured for $100,000.00 for the period 1 November 2001 through  31  December
2003.  Had the applicant’s spouse become a fatality during this period,  the
proceeds of $100,000.00 coverage would have been paid to her IAW  38  U.S.C.
1970.

The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the evaluation  and  indicated  in  November  2003  a
stipend overpayment deduction of $96.67 was taken out of her  pay  for  back
payment of FSGLI.  She visited her MPF to find out  why  and  completed  the
form to decline FSGLI again.  The deduction of $96.67 continued  each  month
until the total debt of $290.00 had been deducted.  Also, in December  2003,
a deduction of $15.00 was deducted for FSGLI.  There was  also  a  deduction
for the month of January and in February the deductions stopped.

Applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or an injustice.  We took notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  and  adopt  their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant  has  not  been  the
victim of an error or injustice.  The applicant had  adequate  time  between
1 November and 31 December 2001 to make an election decision.  Further,  she
cannot provide documentation to indicate she was not aware  of  this  change
in the law nor is there documentation to  support  her  claim  of  declining
coverage prior to  December  2003.   In  accordance  with  public  law,  the
applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period  1 November  2001
- 31 December 2003.  Had the applicant’s spouse  become  a  fatality  during
this period, the proceeds of the $100,000 coverage would have been  paid  to
her IAW 38 U.S.C. 1970.  Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice; that the application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01474 in Executive Session on 31 August 2004, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
                 Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 April 2004, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 22 June 2004, w/atchs.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 July 2004.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, undated.




                       JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                       Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00134

    Original file (BC-2004-00134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 to present. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709

    Original file (BC-2002-03709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00230

    Original file (BC-2003-00230.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02783

    Original file (BC-2003-02783.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse or child(ren), unless the member declined coverage. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 June 2003. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02747

    Original file (BC-2003-02747.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated that Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and that the applicant had adequate time prior to his deployment to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from his pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 May 2003. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974

    Original file (BC-2003-02974.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00229

    Original file (BC-2003-00229.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00106

    Original file (BC-2003-00106.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 August 2002 through 31 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW...