RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01013
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished
Flying Cross (DFC) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had the VSM presented to him in 1969 in Okinawa, along with the Air
Medal, at an award ceremony.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his personnel
records related to his Vietnam service.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 April 1966 for a
period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
airman third class on 9 May 1966, the grade of airman second class on
1 May 1967, and the grade of sergeant on 1 July 1968. He received
five Airman/Enlisted Performance Reports, closing 7 April 1967, 7
April 1968, 7 October 1968, 7 January 1969 and 14 December 1969, in
which the promotion recommendations were “Highly Recommended for Air
Force Career,” “Highly Recommended for Air Force Career,” “7,” “8,”
and “8.” He received the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed
Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
The applicant was released from active duty on 6 June 1970, in the
grade of sergeant. He served 4 years, 1 month and 29 days on active
duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR states that the VSM criteria states that “Personnel
previously awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in
Vietnam between July 1958 and July 1965, may, upon request, exchange
that medal for the VSM. No one is authorized to wear both medals
solely for services in Vietnam.” Applicant was not in Vietnam between
July 1958 and July 1965, therefore, this option does not apply to him.
The AFEM was awarded for service in South Vietnam, before the Vietnam
Service Medal was issued.
On 13 April 2004, a letter was sent to applicant requesting additional
documentation and a copy of his TDY orders and Travel Voucher. He did
not respond. Instead, he filed another DD Form 149, asking again for
the DFC and VSM. He did not provide any supporting documentation with
the new DD Form 149. The applicant may pursue the DFC under the
provisions of the 1996 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The
timeline for submitting decorations to include the DFC is two years
from the date of the act or achievement. However, under the Fiscal
Year 1996 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), (Section 526),
which was enacted into law on 10 February 1996, this timeline has now
been waived. This act provides a process for veterans to be
recommended for decorations if someone (a previous supervisor or
commander), other than the veteran, with first hand knowledge of the
act, service, or achievement submits a written justification for the
decoration through a member of congress. Therefore, they recommend
denial of applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 August 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note a
letter was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation
and a copy of his TDY orders and Travel Voucher. However, he did not
respond. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 September 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Panel Chair
Ms. Deborah A. Erickson, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Mar 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 23 Jul 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 04.
EDWARD H. PARKER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03814
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03814 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 APRIL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the Soldier’s Medal (SM) as recognition for taking charge of surviving military personnel after their C-47 airplane crashed. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02780
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received $100.00 at the time of his discharge but never received the additional $200.00. He did not receive the additional AM, nor did he receive the medal the crew officers recommended him for a deed up and beyond the call of duty. The applicant did not provide any documentation to support award of the AM or DFC.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02176
The AFBCMR considered and denied the applicant’s previous request to have his DFC, 3OLC upgraded to the SS Medal for his action on 24 May 1969. He was told at the time, the 8th TFW would only submit a recommendation for one SS Medal and since the other pilot was the first to destroy 24 trucks, he would receive the higher award. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01922
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 February 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 19 for a period of four years in the rank of airman basic (E-1). We note the applicant’s assertion that he was awarded the DFC; however, there is no indication in his records that he was recommended for, or awarded, the DFC. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01676
Documentation provided by the applicant reflects that a citation for award of the DFC was submitted to the PACAF Awards and Decorations Board; the Board disapproved the DFC and recommended no lesser decoration be awarded. In both of the DPPPR evaluations the recommendation was to deny applicant’s request for reconsideration of the DFC. Exhibit C. Letters, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 12 Jun 07 and 17 Jul 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01853
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The V Bomber Command, Air Corps Commanding, recommended the former member be awarded the Air Medal for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02951
His records contain the orders for award of the basic Air Medal and the Air Medal with one oak leaf cluster, but nothing regarding a DFC. While we note that the applicant provided a copy of a citation to accompany the award of the DFC, he has not provided an approved order awarding him the DFC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02285
COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 15 October 1973 release from active duty, be amended to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Vietnam Service Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt)...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...