RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03814
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 APRIL 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the Soldier’s Medal
(SM) as recognition for taking charge of surviving military personnel after
their C-47 airplane crashed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never recognized for his heroic act of saving the lives of surviving
crewmembers of the crash. The only surviving pilot of the mishap assumed
he had received a medal for his actions. In support of the application,
the applicant submits a newspaper article. The applicant's complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 June 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of airman basic (E-1) at the age of 18 for a period of four years.
He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman second class effective
and with a date of rank of 27 August 1960.
The applicant’s records indicate he received the National Defense Service
Medal, the Air Crew Member Badge, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Air Force
Longevity Service Award. On 30 January 1959, the applicant was honorably
released from active duty, and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He
had served 3 years, 7 months and 18 days on active duty, to include 2 years
and 7 days of foreign service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPPR states
to be awarded the DFC, a member must provide documentation to support acts
of heroism or meritorious achievements while participating in aerial flight
in actual combat in support of operations, and the member did not provide
said documentation.
DPPPR explains to be awarded the SM, a member must provide documentation to
support acts of heroism not involving actual conflict with an armed enemy
of the United States. On 3 June 1957, the applicant was among the nine
people on the C-47 plane, ferrying personnel and equipment to radar sites
in Alaska when the plane’s right engine failed. The C-47 fell from the sky
into the forest below almost 300 miles southwest of Fairbanks. Two pilots
died in the crash. The applicant led his four fellow enlisted men through
an emergency exit to safety, freed the navigator and carried him to a safe
area. The applicant was carrying the pilot out of the plane when a fuel
and oxygen tank exploded. The applicant was never recognized for his
heroic act and the pilot assumed he had been awarded the Soldier’s Medal.
DPPPR suggests the applicant may pursue the DFC and SM under the provisions
of the 1996 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The timeline for
submitting decorations used to be two years from the date of the act or
achievement; however, this timeline has since been waived. The written
recommendations must meet two criteria is: 1) be made by someone other
than the member himself, in the member’s Chain of Command at the time of
the incident, and, who has firsthand knowledge of the acts or achievements;
and 2) be submitted through a congressional member who can ask a military
service to review a proposal for a decoration based on the merits of the
proposal and the award criteria in existence when the event occurred.
DPPPR suggests the applicant us the provisions of the 1996 NDAA.
DPPPR’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response dated 26 January 2005, the applicant states there are no
unit records, sketches, maps, diagrams, or official USAF photographs. The
flight records folder for this period is empty, and his DD 214 shows no
record of the accident. He reiterates circumstances surrounding the
mishap, and provides newspaper articles, a letter from the only surviving
officer, a letter to the surviving officer, a personal statement, and
excerpts from his military personnel records (Exhibit E).
The only surviving officer of the accident submitted a letter dated
2 February 2005 (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for
the Soldier’s Medal. This medal is awarded to those service members who
distinguished themselves by heroic actions, usually at the voluntary risk
of life, but not involving actual combat. In our view, the eyewitness
statement provided by the only surviving pilot of the aircraft accident
supports the applicant’s request to receive this award, and, in our
opinion, meets the criteria for the award of the medal. In view of the
above, we believe that any doubt in this matter should be resolved in his
favor and that his records should be corrected as indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for
award of the Distinguished Flying Cross. The applicant requests he be
awarded the DFC as recognition for his actions taken after a plane crash;
however, from the evidence provided, it does not appear the actions under
review met the criteria for award of this medal. Rather, in view of the
above, we believe the correction we propose ensures he will be afforded
proper and fitting relief based on his actions on 3 June 1957.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 10 June 1957, he was awarded the
Soldier’s Medal for extraordinary heroism on 3 June 1957, and competent
authority determined he was entitled to a 10 percent increase in Reserve
retired pay pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 12739,
effective 1 October 2002.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 22 June 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Panel Chair
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR docket number BC-2004-03814 :
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 02 Dec 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated.18 February 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 29 Dec 04, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 26 Jan 05 w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Support Letter, dated 2 Feb 05.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03814
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, on 10 June 1957, he was
awarded the Soldier’s Medal for extraordinary heroism on 3 June 1957, and
competent authority determined he was entitled to a 10 percent increase
in Reserve retired pay pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section
12739, effective 1 October 2002.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1986-01756-2
He cites another serviceman who received the MOH for heroic service in attempting to rescue a fellow officer from a flaming aircraft in 1920. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board denied the...
He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator. During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and an AM was awarded upon the completion of five missions. In 1944, the 8th Air Force required completion of 30 combat flight missions; however, the applicant did not complete 30 missions.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03110
A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03110
A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00358
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00358 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an additional 10% retirement pay for receiving the Airman’s Medal (AmnM), awarded 17 Jun 95 for heroism. ...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the application and states that applicant, along with all crew members who flew evacuation flights, received the Air Medal in recognition for their meritorious achievement. We recognize the periods of these awards will overlap; however, since the Air Medal was awarded for flights in C-46 and C-47 cargo aircraft and the award of Soldier’s Medal is recommended based on voluntary mercy missions flown in L-4J...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01180
The following information was extracted from documents provided by the applicant (the member’s son) at Exhibit A and by the Air Force at Exhibit C. The applicant originally appealed through his Congressional representative on 10 Dec 01. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes the applicant has not provided any documentation showing his father was an officer and a pilot, awarded the DFC, demoted by court-martial from an...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522
He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02299
In response, on 1 May 2006, SAF/MRBP advised him that his inquiry was referred to their office since they have primary staff responsibility for high-level awards and decorations within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force and provided him instructions for submitting the request under the provisions of the 1996 NDAA. In an application to the AFBCMR, dated 25 July 2006, the applicant requested the AM be upgraded to the DFC, and provided documentation in support of his request. The...