Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03814
Original file (BC-2004-03814.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-03814
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  17 APRIL 2006

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the  Soldier’s  Medal
(SM) as recognition for taking charge of surviving military personnel  after
their C-47 airplane crashed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was never recognized for his heroic act of saving the lives of  surviving
crewmembers of the crash.  The only surviving pilot of  the  mishap  assumed
he had received a medal for his actions.  In  support  of  the  application,
the  applicant  submits  a  newspaper  article.   The  applicant's  complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 June 1955, the applicant enlisted in the  Regular  Air  Force  in  the
grade of airman basic (E-1) at the age of 18 for a  period  of  four  years.
He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman second class  effective
and with a date of rank of 27 August 1960.

The applicant’s records indicate he received the  National  Defense  Service
Medal, the Air Crew Member Badge, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Air  Force
Longevity Service Award.  On 30 January 1959, the  applicant  was  honorably
released from active duty, and transferred to the  Air  Force  Reserve.   He
had served 3 years, 7 months and 18 days on active duty, to include 2  years
and 7 days of foreign service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s  request.   DPPPR  states
to be awarded the DFC, a member must provide documentation to  support  acts
of heroism or meritorious achievements while participating in aerial  flight
in actual combat in support of operations, and the member  did  not  provide
said documentation.

DPPPR explains to be awarded the SM, a member must provide documentation  to
support acts of heroism not involving actual conflict with  an  armed  enemy
of the United States.  On 3 June 1957, the  applicant  was  among  the  nine
people on the C-47 plane, ferrying personnel and equipment  to  radar  sites
in Alaska when the plane’s right engine failed.  The C-47 fell from the  sky
into the forest below almost 300 miles southwest of Fairbanks.   Two  pilots
died in the crash.  The applicant led his four fellow enlisted  men  through
an emergency exit to safety, freed the navigator and carried him to  a  safe
area.  The applicant was carrying the pilot out of the  plane  when  a  fuel
and oxygen tank exploded.   The  applicant  was  never  recognized  for  his
heroic act and the pilot assumed he had been awarded the Soldier’s Medal.

DPPPR suggests the applicant may pursue the DFC and SM under the  provisions
of the 1996 National Defense Authorization Act  (NDAA).   The  timeline  for
submitting decorations used to be two years from the  date  of  the  act  or
achievement; however, this timeline has  since  been  waived.   The  written
recommendations must meet two criteria is:  1)  be  made  by  someone  other
than the member himself, in the member’s Chain of Command  at  the  time  of
the incident, and, who has firsthand knowledge of the acts or  achievements;
and 2) be submitted through a congressional member who can  ask  a  military
service to review a proposal for a decoration based on  the  merits  of  the
proposal and the award  criteria  in  existence  when  the  event  occurred.
DPPPR suggests the applicant us the provisions of the 1996 NDAA.

DPPPR’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response dated 26 January 2005, the applicant  states  there  are  no
unit records, sketches, maps, diagrams, or official USAF  photographs.   The
flight records folder for this period is empty, and  his  DD  214  shows  no
record  of  the  accident.   He  reiterates  circumstances  surrounding  the
mishap, and provides newspaper articles, a letter from  the  only  surviving
officer, a letter to  the  surviving  officer,  a  personal  statement,  and
excerpts from his military personnel records (Exhibit E).

The only  surviving  officer  of  the  accident  submitted  a  letter  dated
2 February 2005 (Exhibit F).

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request  for
the Soldier’s Medal.  This medal is awarded to  those  service  members  who
distinguished themselves by heroic actions, usually at  the  voluntary  risk
of life, but not involving actual  combat.   In  our  view,  the  eyewitness
statement provided by the only surviving  pilot  of  the  aircraft  accident
supports the  applicant’s  request  to  receive  this  award,  and,  in  our
opinion, meets the criteria for the award of the  medal.   In  view  of  the
above, we believe that any doubt in this matter should be  resolved  in  his
favor and that his records should be corrected as indicated below.

4.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request  for
award of the Distinguished Flying  Cross.   The  applicant  requests  he  be
awarded the DFC as recognition for his actions taken after  a  plane  crash;
however, from the evidence provided, it does not appear  the  actions  under
review met the criteria for award of this medal.  Rather,  in  view  of  the
above, we believe the correction we propose  ensures  he  will  be  afforded
proper and fitting relief based on his actions on 3 June 1957.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 10 June 1957, he was awarded  the
Soldier’s Medal for extraordinary heroism  on  3 June  1957,  and  competent
authority determined he was entitled to a 10  percent  increase  in  Reserve
retired pay pursuant  to  Title  10,  United  States  Code,  Section  12739,
effective 1 October 2002.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 22 June 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Panel Chair
      Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR docket number BC-2004-03814 :

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 02 Dec 04, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated.18 February 04.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 29 Dec 04, w/atch.
      Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 26 Jan 05 w/atchs.
      Exhibit F.  Support Letter, dated 2 Feb 05.




                 FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III
                 Panel Chair





AFBCMR BC-2004-03814



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF


      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, on 10 June 1957, he was
awarded the Soldier’s Medal for extraordinary heroism on 3 June 1957, and
competent authority determined he was entitled to a 10 percent increase
in Reserve retired pay pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section
12739, effective 1 October 2002.









  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1986-01756-2

    Original file (BC-1986-01756-2.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He cites another serviceman who received the MOH for heroic service in attempting to rescue a fellow officer from a flaming aircraft in 1920. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, the Board denied the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100023

    Original file (0100023.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator. During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and an AM was awarded upon the completion of five missions. In 1944, the 8th Air Force required completion of 30 combat flight missions; however, the applicant did not complete 30 missions.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03110

    Original file (BC-2002-03110.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03110

    Original file (BC-2002-03110.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073

    Original file (BC-2005-02073.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00358

    Original file (BC-2006-00358.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00358 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an additional 10% retirement pay for receiving the Airman’s Medal (AmnM), awarded 17 Jun 95 for heroism. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001950

    Original file (0001950.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the application and states that applicant, along with all crew members who flew evacuation flights, received the Air Medal in recognition for their meritorious achievement. We recognize the periods of these awards will overlap; however, since the Air Medal was awarded for flights in C-46 and C-47 cargo aircraft and the award of Soldier’s Medal is recommended based on voluntary mercy missions flown in L-4J...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01180

    Original file (BC-2002-01180.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following information was extracted from documents provided by the applicant (the member’s son) at Exhibit A and by the Air Force at Exhibit C. The applicant originally appealed through his Congressional representative on 10 Dec 01. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes the applicant has not provided any documentation showing his father was an officer and a pilot, awarded the DFC, demoted by court-martial from an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522

    Original file (bc-2005-01522.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02299

    Original file (BC-2006-02299.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In response, on 1 May 2006, SAF/MRBP advised him that his inquiry was referred to their office since they have primary staff responsibility for high-level awards and decorations within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force and provided him instructions for submitting the request under the provisions of the 1996 NDAA. In an application to the AFBCMR, dated 25 July 2006, the applicant requested the AM be upgraded to the DFC, and provided documentation in support of his request. The...