RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00567
INDEX CODE: 131.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a
Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY03A (8 July 2003) lieutenant
colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) (P0503A).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She reviewed her pre-selection brief before and after the CY03A lieutenant
colonel CSB and found small administrative errors. She found a penciled in
correction (oak leaf cluster (OLC)) on a formal decoration nomination, she
was awarded two Meritorious Service Medals versus three and that she was on
a medical deferment. During her promotion counseling, she was advised her
biggest indicator for non-selection was her assignment history, which did
not indicate career progression, and more significantly, she had never been
a flight commander. Another notable administrative error was that her
brief should have indicated that she was designated and selected for ACSC
in residence, however, operationally deferred in the first year of the
program. However, she was later disqualified for ACSC and never
reconsidered even though a statue of limitations for disqualification was
removed from her record.
In support of her application, she provides a personal statement, a copy of
the discrepancy report for Board P0503A, copies of her MSM citations,
copies of her Officer Performance Reports for the period beginning 14
December 1992 and ending 24 March 2003 and her Promotion Recommendation
form for the P0503A Board. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates the applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date as 1
June 1988. She is currently serving on active duty in the grade of major,
with a date of rank of 1 October 1999. As of 22 July 2004, the MilPDS
reflects two awards of the Meritorious Service Medal with the last award
closing 28 March 2000.
The applicant’s OSB contains AF Forms 707B, Officer Performance Reports
(OPRs) beginning with the rating period 9 June 1997 and ending on 24 March
2003 with overall ratings of “Meets Standards.” The applicant has one
nonselection to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY03A (18 Jul 03)
(P0503A) lieutenant colonel CSB.
Additionally, the applicant’s OSB indicates she was awarded three
Meritorious Service Medals for the periods 26 March 1990 through 18
November 1994, 30 November 1994 through 8 July 1997 and 9 July 1997 28
March 2000; the Air Force Commendation Medal for the period 26 March 1990
through 18 November 1994; and three Air Force Achievement Medals for the
periods 28 November 1988 through 1 April 1990, 29 January 1994 through 12
February 1994 and 8 September 1996 through 5 December 1996. The assignment
history portion of the OSB does not indicate "flight commander" duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPASB states that there are no discrepancies between "duty history"
and "duty titles." The duty titles do not specifically reflect "Flight
Commander," but they accurately reflect her roles and responsibilities.
The AFPC/DPASB evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPAPE states that the applicant was selected to attend Air Command and
Staff College (ACSC) in her first year of eligibility (1999) but was
subsequently operationally deferred to take an assignment to Guam. As an
ops-deferred ACSC select, she was entitled the opportunity to attend the
following year as long as her commander revalidated her as qualified to
attend. Her commander chose to remove her from attendance with prejudice
based on her performance under his command which was within his purview as
her commander and documented in her record. As a result, she became
ineligible for what would have been her last year of eligibility. The
AFPC/DPAPE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. DPPPO states the
applicant does not provide any documentation demonstrating what she did to
correct the missing MSM prior to the convening of the board date.
Additionally, states DPPPO, since the citation for the MSM, 2 OLC, was
filed in her Officer Selection Record, a notice was placed in her record
indicating the decoration was missing; therefore, the board members were
aware of its existence and it was factored into their promotion evaluation.
The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 18 June 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We have reviewed the available evidence
pertaining to the applicant’s assertions related to her incorrect duty
history and Professional Military Education (PME) designation. Other than
her own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence showing her PME
status or her duty history on her OSB were erroneous when seen by the
selection board in question. While it appears the citation for the
applicant’s MSM (1OLC) was missing from her selection record and the
incorrect number of MSMs was shown on the OSB, we note there was a
discrepancy letter filed in her OSB and her MSM (2OLC) was on file in her
selection record. Therefore, it is our opinion the selection board was
aware of the fact that she had been awarded three MSMs. More importantly,
we note that information similar to that contained in the MSM (1OLC) is
contained in the OPRs the applicant received for her assignment at Ramstein
AB. Hence, we find the selection board had at its disposal a sufficiently
accurate record on which to base its decision concerning the applicant’s
promotability in relation to her peers. In view of the above, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 August 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Feb 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPASB, dated 2 Mar 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPAPE, dated 17 May 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 15 Jun 04, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jun 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01930 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief be corrected and his record, to include his most recent Officer Performance Report (OPR) (1 September 2002-13 June 2003), be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to Lieutenant Colonel...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01425
However, Air Force policy does not allow for decorations with close out dates or approval dates after the convening of the board to be filed in a member’s record. In addition, because of the closeout date of his MSM (2OLC) (7 August 2003), there is no basis to favorably consider his request for consideration of this award by the CY02B and CY03A lieutenant colonel selection boards. Finally, since there is no indication in the available evidence that the applicant’s record of performance...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03054
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03054 INDEX NUMBER: 131.01; 111.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY03A (8 Jul 03) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03874
The signature date of 28 July 2003 on his AF Form 475 (Education/Training Report), closing 28 March 2003, be changed to an earlier date so that it may be accepted for filing for the CY03A (8 July 2003) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). He was wronged by the excessive period of time it took to complete and file his final Training Report (TR) in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); as well as the time it took to update his current duty history after he arrived at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03871
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states that each officer eligible for a CSB receives an Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) prior to convening of the board which contains the same data that will appear on the OSB at the central board. The instructions specifically state, “Officers will not be considered by a Special Selection Board if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03316
Operational experience for a support officer is the exception rather than the rule and “counts extra;” therefore, once his DAFSCs are corrected, he should be given SSB consideration for the CY99B LtCol CSB. The applicant has requested SSB consideration based on correcting his DAFSC to reflect his command post duty while he was assigned as Chief Security Police and EAO. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389
His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01266
AFPC/DPAFE's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial and states eligible officers meeting a board have the option to submit a letter to the board president addressing any matter of record concerning themselves that they believe is important to their consideration for promotion. The completion of ACSC is not a requirement for promotion to lieutenant colonel. After reviewing the complete case file, we noted that the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01113
The applicant failed to exercise reasonable diligence in maintaining his record prior to the CSBs; therefore, that office recommends denial of the applicant’s request for SSB consideration with the corrected DAFSC. Applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 22 May 1992 to 10 May 1993, did not reflect his correct Duty Air Force Specialty Code S1555E at the time he was considered for promotion by the CY00A, CY01B, CY02B and the CY03A...