Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00690
Original file (BC-2004-00690.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  04-00690
            INDEX CODE:137.04
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he elected  spouse  and  children  coverage
under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 11 September 1990, he elected spouse and  children  coverage.   He  would
like his daughter to be covered under the RCSBP but was told that  he  could
not because his records showed a “spouse only” election.

In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement and a  copy
of  his  RCSBP  plan  election  certificate.    The   applicant’s   complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The Military Personnel Database reflects the applicant was assigned  to  the
Retired Reserve Awaiting Pay  At  Age  60  and  began  drawing  retired  pay
effective 28 December 2003 in the grade of lieutenant colonel.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this  application  are  contained
in the letter prepared by  the  appropriate  office  of  the  Air  Force  at
Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied.  DPS states that on  5  April
1990, the applicant elected Option “C”  immediate  annuity  for  spouse  and
children.  This election was correct based on his  youngest  child  at  that
time.  The package that was mailed to  the  applicant  explained  in  detail
that any life changing event should be reported to the  Entitlements  Branch
within one year of the event. DPS  indicates  that  the  applicant  did  not
notify their office within the year time  frame  of  having  another  child.
The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  19
March 2004 for review and  comment.   As  of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  We have reviewed  the  available  evidence
pertaining to the applicant’s assertions relating to his  Reserve  Component
Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election,  and  we  are  unpersuaded  that  an
RCSBP election of spouse and child based on his  youngest  child’s  date  of
birth is  warranted.   His  contentions  in  this  regard  are  duly  noted;
however, in our opinion, the Air Force office of primary responsibility  has
adequately addressed these contentions and we are in  agreement  with  their
recommendation.  In  view  of  the  above,  we  find  no  basis  to  warrant
favorable consideration of this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 14 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Panel Chair
                 Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
                 Mrs. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  04-00690  was
considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPS, dated 17 Mar 04 w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Mar 04.





                                             ROSCOE HINTON JR.
                                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01922

    Original file (BC-2003-01922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01922 INDEX CODE: 137.00, 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse and child as his beneficiaries for his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant’s 28 September 1997 RCSBP Election Certificate reflects his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03077

    Original file (BC-2004-03077.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Dec 92, he executed ARPC Form 123 electing spouse and child coverage, under Option C (immediate annuity), based on full retired pay. On 17 Feb 04, he executed DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, electing not to participate in the SBP. Novel, Member Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 04, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01914

    Original file (BC-2004-01914.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the section of law applicable to reserve component members in effect at the time the former member was eligible to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan did not require spousal notification if the member deferred making an election until age 60. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01762

    Original file (BC-2004-01762.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. During RCSBP open enrollment season, 1 March 1999 to 28 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage for their spouses were able to elect or increase coverage. DPS states if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the member’s record should be corrected to show he elected full, immediate coverage for his spouse (Option C) under the RCSBP, effective 9 June 1998.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02348

    Original file (BC-2003-02348.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant married on 26 March 1982 and elected RCSBP - Option CF, annuity for spouse and child coverage based on full-retired pay on 3 November 1987. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00275

    Original file (BC-2004-00275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00275 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election, made on 23 July 1986, be changed from full SBP coverage to cover the period between December 1997 and 28 October 2003 only. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04099

    Original file (BC-2003-04099.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. There is no evidence that the former member made an election at that time. Absent persuasive evidence, applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103633

    Original file (0103633.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ARPC/DPS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 February 2002 for review and response within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02540

    Original file (BC-2004-02540.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant claims she was not aware her husband had chosen the immediate annuity option for RCSBP and that she received written correspondence stating she was not eligible for benefits until her husband’s 60th birthday, records indicate the member received an RCSBP package explaining in detail how the RCSBP permits a member to provide a monthly annuity to their designated beneficiaries in the event of their death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201652

    Original file (0201652.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.