Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00678
Original file (BC-2004-00678.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00678
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
                       COUNSEL:

                       HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of  the  Southwest  Asia
Service Medal (SWASM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The SWASM he was awarded is not reflected on  his  DD  Form  214.   He
requests the SWASM be added to his DD Form 214.

Applicant's complete submission, with an attachment,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on  11 January
1978, as an airman basic (AB) for a period of four years.

His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit
Award (AFOUA), Air Good Conduct Medal  (AFGCM)  with  three  Oak  Leaf
Clusters (OLC), National  Defense  Service  Medal  (NDSM),  Air  Force
Overseas Long Tour Ribbon; Air Force Longevity Service  Award  with  2
OLCs and the Air Force Training Ribbon.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he had 4 years, 2 months  and  22
days of foreign service.  His DD Form 214 also reflects he served from
2 August  1990  to  15  June  1992  in  support  of  Operation  DESERT
SHIELD/STORM.

The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 15 June  1992
and transferred to the Air  Force  Reserve.   He  served  14 years,  5
months and 5 days of active service.

On 26 May 2004,AFPC/DPPPR requested the applicant provide  a  copy  of
his TDY order and travel voucher to verify  his  eligibility  for  the
award of the SWASM.  The applicant did not respond.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR states servicemembers are awarded the SWASM for  service
in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM from 2 August  1990
through 30 November 1995.  The TDY order and Travel voucher  are  used
to determine a servicemember’s eligibility for  the  award.   The  TDY
order shows which operation the servicemember  was  deployed  and  the
voucher verifies the  days  the  servicemember  was  in  the  Area  of
Responsibility.  HQ AFPC/DPPPR further states since the applicant  did
not respond to the request to provide  documentation  to  support  his
request, they are unable to verify  his  eligibility  for  the  SWASM.
DPPPR recommends denying the requested relief.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4
June 2004, for review and response.  As of this date, no response  has
been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or  an  injustice.
The applicant did not respond to a request to provide a  copy  of  his
travel voucher or TDY orders showing he was TDY or deployed in support
of Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  Therefore, in the absence of  evidence
to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to  recommend  granting  the
relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-00678 in Executive Session on 14 July 2004, under the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Member
                 Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 04, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 26 May 04.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 04.




                       OLGA M. CRERAR
                       Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577

    Original file (BC-2003-02577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00524

    Original file (BC-2004-00524.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPRFQ states the applicant did not respond to the request to provide documentation to reflect her deployment in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00722

    Original file (BC-2004-00722.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial noting the SWASM is awarded to members of the service who served in support of Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield between 2 Aug 90 and 30 Nov 95. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02378

    Original file (BC-2003-02378.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The only issue to be considered by the Board is his request for the SAEMR. His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records to substantiate his request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02010

    Original file (BC-2004-02010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02010 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). In addition, the servicemember must be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00039

    Original file (BC-2003-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did receive the National Defense Service Medal for serving on active duty during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 April 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900364

    Original file (9900364.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit B. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Jun 99, w/BCMR response. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00483

    Original file (BC-2004-00483.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00483 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Kuwait (KLM-M), the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA), and the National Defense Service Medal. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790

    Original file (BC-2002-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03062

    Original file (BC-2002-03062.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...