Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00039
Original file (BC-2003-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00039
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His military service records and DD Form 214 be amended to include all
service ribbons and decorations he earned for service in Desert Shield
from 09/04/90 to 04/___/1991.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was retired on 31 May 1991 and  his  final  DD  Form  214  did  not
reflect any awards for his support of Desert Shield.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his DD Form  214
for the period 22 February 1978 to 31 May 1991 and an  undated  letter
from the commander of HQ Military Airlift Command (MAC) at Scott  AFB,
IL, concerning his support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant contracted his initial enlistment  in  the  Regular  Air
Force on 9 December 1970.  He continued to enlist and serve  until  31
May 1991, when he was honorably released from active duty and  retired
in the grade of  master  sergeant,  effective  1 June  1991.   He  was
credited with 20 years, 5 months and 22 days of active  duty  service.
During his last period of service (22 February  1978  through  31  May
1991), he was credited with five years, one  month  and  two  days  of
foreign service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR states that the applicant states that he served  in  Desert
Shield, but did not state that he was deployed to  the  Persian  Gulf.
He did receive the National  Defense  Service  Medal  for  serving  on
active duty during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM.  He  has  not
provided any documentation to substantiate his  claim  for  additional
awards.

On 23 January 2003,  DPPPR  informed  the  applicant  that  there  was
nothing in his records to indicate he had been deployed to the Persian
Gulf in direct support of Operation DESERT  SHIELD/DESERT  STORM.   He
was asked to provide a copy of the TDY order that deployed him  and  a
copy of the Travel Voucher that  showed  the  location  and  inclusive
dates of his deployment overseas.  He  did  not  respond.   Therefore,
they recommend disapproval of applicant’s request.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 18 April 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.   The
applicant was asked to furnish documents he might have to  verify  his
TDY that deployed him and a copy of the travel voucher that showed the
location and inclusive dates of his deployment overseas;  however,  he
did not reply to the request.  We again state that if documentation is
provided verifying his TDY, we would  be  willing  to  reconsider  his
request.  In the absence of such evidence, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  this  application,  BC-
2003-00039,  in  Executive  Session  on  14  August  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
                       Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jan 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 2 Apr 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Apr 03.




                             JOSEPH A. ROJ
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03062

    Original file (BC-2002-03062.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03062

    Original file (BC-2002-03062.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900692

    Original file (9900692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 13 Apr 99, the Chief, Awards & Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, requested the applicant provide a copy of his Travel Voucher in order to verify the location and inclusive dates of his TDY in support of Operation Desert Shield. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a copy of his Travel Voucher. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00271

    Original file (BC-2003-00271.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00271 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) and/or the Kuwait Liberation Medal. Although the LANTIRN system is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790

    Original file (BC-2002-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900364

    Original file (9900364.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit B. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Jun 99, w/BCMR response. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-00364 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00483

    Original file (BC-2004-00483.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00483 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Kuwait (KLM-M), the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA), and the National Defense Service Medal. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | Bc-2006-03893

    Original file (Bc-2006-03893.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits excerpts from his military personnel records, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and a copy of the criteria for the SWASM, KLM-SA, and KLS-K medals. DPPPR states after a thorough review of applicant’s military record and resources available, they were unable to verify applicant was in the area of eligibility in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. He provided an enlisted Performance Report...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803320

    Original file (9803320.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Sep 99 for review and response within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00678

    Original file (BC-2004-00678.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), Air Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) with three Oak Leaf Clusters (OLC), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Air Force Overseas Long Tour Ribbon; Air Force Longevity Service Award with 2 OLCs and the Air Force Training Ribbon. On 26 May 2004,AFPC/DPPPR requested the applicant provide a copy of his TDY order and travel voucher to verify his eligibility for the award of the SWASM. Novel, Member The following...