Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00597
Original file (BC-2004-00597.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00597
            INDEX NUMBER:  108.00
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  None

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Injuries he sustained in the military be  listed  in  his  records  as
service connected.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He sustained a number of injuries during his active duty service  that
have lingered and continue to cause him problems.  In support  of  his
appeal, applicant provides a summary  of  injuries  he  sustained  and
copies of recent medical records.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 7  Nov  60.   In
Aug 64, the applicant requested early release from the Air  Force  for
the purpose of  attending  college.   His  request  was  approved  and
applicant was separated from service on 4 Sep 64.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s
request.  Evidence of record indicates that  the  applicant  performed
his duties in a satisfactory manner up to the time  of  his  voluntary
release from active duty.  The  absence  of  service  medical  records
makes it impossible to assess what medical conditions were incurred or
existed while the applicant was on active duty.  However, evidence  is
sufficient to conclude there were no conditions that  interfered  with
performance of duty and  therefore  required  processing  through  the
disability evaluation system.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
27 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response
has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been  the  victim
of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend  granting  the
relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number  BC-2004-
00597 in Executive Session on 1 September 2004, under the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. John E.B. Smith, Member
      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Feb 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
                dated 22 Jul 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 27 Jul 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03293

    Original file (BC-2004-03293.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03293 INDEX CODE: 108.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 NOV 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting his honorable discharge be changed to a medical retirement and that he be eligible for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Review...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00229

    Original file (BC-2004-00229.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition and back strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00359

    Original file (BC-2004-00359.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    While in the Air Force, he served as an Air Policeman and Administrative Supervisor. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial and states, in part, that although his service- connected medical conditions exceed the required 10%, the conditions were determined to be non-combat related, except for his impaired hearing which is rated at 0%. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01933

    Original file (BC-2004-01933.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his duodenal ulcer, back injury, quadruple heart bypass, and tinnitus are not combat related. For duodenal ulcer to qualify for CRSC, it must be presumptive to POW internment and so stated in the applicable rating decision. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01893

    Original file (BC-2004-01893.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01893 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to show that he was eligible to receive Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits from the date the CRSC program was established until the date of his death. He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00297

    Original file (BC-2004-00297.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His spinal disc condition is the direct result of military operations during World War II. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01342

    Original file (BC-2004-01342.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, that although his disability rating exceeds the required 10% rating, he does not qualify for CRSC since he did not complete 20 years of active service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). However, after careful review of the available records, it appears he has been credited with all active...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01903

    Original file (BC-2004-01903.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant’s injuries were not the direct result of enemy action. His injury was caused by the bomb exploding and was the direct result of enemy action. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the documentation provided by applicant, we find insufficient evidence to substantiate the explosion was the direct result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00257

    Original file (BC-2004-00257.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00257 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, prostate cancer and bladder cancer, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02038

    Original file (BC-2004-02038.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his anxiety disorder and spinal disc condition are not combat related.