Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01342
Original file (BC-2004-01342.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01342
            INDEX NUMBER:  128.14

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he is qualified for Combat-Related  Special
Compensation (CRSC) benefits.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He  should  be  entitled  to  receive  CRSC  benefits  since  combat-related
injuries rendered him unfit for duty and he  is  receiving  100%  disability
from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was permanently retired for disability effective 3 May 1948,  with
a disability rating of 40%.  He completed 4 years, 10 months,  and  19  days
of active federal military service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating,  in  part,  that
although his disability rating exceeds the required 10% rating, he does  not
qualify for CRSC since he did not complete 20 years of active service.

The Combat-Related  Special  Compensation  (CRSC)  program,  established  by
Public Law (PL) 107-314, provides  compensation  to  certain  retirees  with
combat-related disabilities.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  1  Jul
2004 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case.   However,  after
careful review of the available records, it appears  he  has  been  credited
with all active service creditable under the governing regulation  and  laws
in effect at the time of his  disability  retirement.   We  therefore  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that  applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2004-01342
in Executive Session on 15 September 2004, under the provisions of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                       Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
                       Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member





The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Apr 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 21 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02599

    Original file (BC-2003-02599.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02599 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air National Guard (ANG) service be combined with his active service to qualify for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01715

    Original file (BC-2004-01715.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01715 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: DAV XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for 20 years of longevity service for the purpose of determining his eligibility for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits and Concurrent Retirement Disability Payments (CRDP). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00105

    Original file (BC-2004-00105.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00105 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition for Neurofibromatosis be considered as presumptive of Agent Orange due to his tours in Vietnam and combat related in order to qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01472

    Original file (BC-2004-01472.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request stating, in part, although his service-connected disabilities exceed the required 10 percent rating, the applicant does not meet the basic CRSC eligibility criteria of having 20 years of active service. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00191

    Original file (BC-2004-00191.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00191 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hearing loss and labrynthitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01385

    Original file (BC-2004-01385.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01385 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect 20 years of active service, rather than 19 years and 3 months of active service, to entitle him to Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits. However, after careful...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02439

    Original file (BC-2003-02439.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of Title 10, United States Code, unless such retirement is under section 12731b of that same title. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00214

    Original file (BC-2004-00214.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00214 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected disabilities, Loss of Part of Skull, Spinal Disc Condition, and Caisson Disease of the Bones, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00229

    Original file (BC-2004-00229.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition and back strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00359

    Original file (BC-2004-00359.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    While in the Air Force, he served as an Air Policeman and Administrative Supervisor. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial and states, in part, that although his service- connected medical conditions exceed the required 10%, the conditions were determined to be non-combat related, except for his impaired hearing which is rated at 0%. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...