Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00257
Original file (BC-2004-00257.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00257
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
XXXXXXX
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO
XXXXXXX


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  30 Jul 05


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  conditions,  prostate  cancer  and  bladder
cancer, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify  for  compensation
under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His medical conditions are due to his exposure to Agent  Orange  during  the
Vietnam War.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  24
May 1948.  He was progressively promoted to the  grade  of  staff  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 June  1968.
  He  served  as  a  Liquid  Fuels  System   Maintenance   Specialist.    He
participated in the United Nations (UN) Offensive from 16 September 1950  to
2 November 1950,  the  Chinese  Communist  Forces  (CCF)  Intervention  from
3 November 1950 to 24 January 1951, and the U.N. Summer-Fall Offensive  from
9 July 1951 to 27 November 1951.  He served in Vietnam from  1965  to  1966.
He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 1 November 1969, having  served
20 years, 7 months, and 25 days on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 40% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 January 2004, based  on  the  fact
that his service-connected medical conditions  were  determined  not  to  be
combat related.

_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial and states, in  part,  that  applicant  did  not
provide any documentation to support that his  conditions  were  the  direct
result of Agent Orange.  His records show that his  bladder  cancer  is  not
combat related and there is no evidence he has been diagnosed with  prostate
cancer.

The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  30
July 2004 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
00257 in Executive Session on 6 April 2005, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Jan 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 19 Jul 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jul 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00564

    Original file (BC-2004-00564.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be eligible to receive CRSC benefits since he was disability retired with a 50% rating and his retired pay multiplier infers that he had 20 years of service. c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04103

    Original file (BC-2007-04103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00105

    Original file (BC-2004-00105.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00105 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition for Neurofibromatosis be considered as presumptive of Agent Orange due to his tours in Vietnam and combat related in order to qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00920

    Original file (BC-2004-00920.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00920 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, prostate gland condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of his request, applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02471

    Original file (BC-2003-02471.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 11 Jul 03 based upon the preponderance of evidence that none of his service-connected conditions were determined to be combat-related _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states nothing in his medical records reflects he was exposed to Agent Orange. Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 30 Jul 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03786

    Original file (BC-2004-03786.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03757

    Original file (BC-2004-03757.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jan 05 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01505

    Original file (BC-2004-01505.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01505 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Nov 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, lumbar disc disease, impairment of sphincter control, loss of use of both feet, neurologenic bladder, kidney trauma, and cervical disc disease, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01865

    Original file (BC-2005-01865.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the death of her husband, she became aware that his disability rating had been increased to 40% and applied for CRSC benefits on his behalf. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 05. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01865 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02178

    Original file (BC-2004-02178.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02178 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes mellitus and paralysis of sciatic nerve, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...