RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04037
INDEX NUMBER: 112.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The 33-month extension of his 26 Jan 00 enlistment be reduced to 14
months.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was informed by his military personnel flight (MPF) that he would
have to extend his enlistment for 33 months to qualify for
retraining.
Based on the requirement in AFI 36-2606, paragraph 4.2.1, he only
needed to extend for a period of 14 months.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant reenlisted in the Air Force for a period of four years
on 26 Jan 00. On 16 Dec 02, he requested a 33-month extension of
this enlistment for the purpose of acquiring retainability for
retraining. His extension was approved on 3 Feb 03.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request. In order
for a second term airman to retrain into the 1N0X1 career field
(Intel), they must have 36 months of retainability from their class
graduation date. The applicant graduated in Oct 03. The extension
he entered into gave him the required retainability.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
19 Dec 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
04037 in Executive Session on 21 January 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
Ms. Rita A. Maldonado, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Dec 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 16 Dec 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03177
An AF Form 1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve) indicates that on 17 Apr 03, the applicant extended his enlistment for eight months to qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment, changing his DOS to 21 Apr 05. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01297
On 24 March 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force for a period of four years. On 13 February 2002, applicant requested that his enlistment of 1 October 1997 for a period of 4 years be extended for a period of 18 months to qualify for retraining. AF Form 901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4, indicates that at the time of his enlistment of 8 November 2002, his Selective Reenlistment Bonus was paid in Zone B, with a Multiple 6.5 based on 4 years and 0 months.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02855
If the Board cannot pardon him or chooses not to do so, he requests that his FBI record be corrected to reflect that he was only arrested once, not twice as his record reflects. On 6 Oct 00, the applicant requested a waiver of his “4F” RE code to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03913
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was required to extend his current enlistment for 18 months to meet the service obligation for an in-place overseas tour, he requested to extend to his high year of tenure date (HYTD) of 8 April 2007. The applicant’s HYT as a Master Sergeant, at the time of his extension, was 8 April 2007 (24 years). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
On 14 April 2000, the applicant, who had an established date of separation (DOS) of 25 April 2000, reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years, thereby establishing a new DOS of 13 April 2004. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded by stating that on his AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, it reflects that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00311
DPPAE recommends a constructive reenlistment be authorized on the applicant effective 1 October 2003, for 4 years and 7 months, as he should have reenlisted upon approval of the retraining. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 30 September 2003, rather than 22 March 2005, and reenlisted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03595
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03595 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 25, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he reenlisted into the 1N531 (intelligence) Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) instead of the 3P071 (security forces) AFSC. AFPC Reenlistments advised the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03159
According to HQ AFPC/DPPAE (Exhibit C), effective 5 Mar 04, the Air Force reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to three months prior to a member’s ETS. As the Air Force announces SRB changes, affected personnel are given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the SRB changes to reenlist. Eligibility is based on the policies in effect at the time the member reenlists.
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The military personnel flight (MPF) extended his enlistment based on a service commitment after graduation and failed to request a waiver of the service retainability required to attend the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) Academy. He further states that after 13 years in the Air Force this is totally unjust to him and the time he has dedicated to the Air Force (Exhibit E). ...