RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02522
INDEX NUMBER: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His extension date be changed from 24 August 2002 to 15 Oct 2000.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The military personnel flight (MPF) extended his enlistment based on a
service commitment after graduation and failed to request a waiver of
the service retainability required to attend the Air Force Office of
Special Investigations (AFOSI) Academy.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his extension of
enlistment, and an AIG message from the USAF Special Investigator’s
Academy (USAFSIA).
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) and the
applicant’s master personnel record reflects the applicant enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 21 August 1987 for a period of four (4)
years. He has served on continuous active duty and entered his
current enlistment on 25 January 1995.
On 25 January 2000, he executed an extension of this enlistment for a
period of 25 months for the purpose of qualifying for training or
retraining. He entered this extension on 25 July 2000 and has a Date
of Separation (DOS) of 24 August 2002.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the applicant’s
request and states that his extension document clearly reflects the
reason for the service retainability was to qualify for training or
retraining. They further state that there are two service
retainability requirements that must be met for the AFOSI specialty…,
21 months to attend the course and 4 years for the assignment. Based
upon the above they recommended that the applicant’s request be denied
(Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 20 December 2000, the applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation
and submitted a response. Applicant cited a chronology of events
leading up to his extension of enlistment. He states that after
extending his enlistment, he later received the OSI reporting
instructions which were contrary to the guidance received from the
MPF. He further states that after 13 years in the Air Force this is
totally unjust to him and the time he has dedicated to the Air Force
(Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and
his contentions were duly noted. However, we were not persuaded that
his uncorroborated contentions, in and by themselves, were
sufficiently compelling to conclude that he was advised incorrectly by
his military personnel flight in regards to his extension of
enlistment. Therefore, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale
expressed as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of the above, and
absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 20 March 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Member
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Sep 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 26 Oct 00.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 Nov 00.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 20 Dec 00.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
Based on the information he received from the MPF, on 16 Aug 00, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years. The applicant states, and we believe, that he based his decision to reenlist on his entitlement to receive the SRB. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03317 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02769 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The twenty-three (23) month extension to his 25 February 1998 enlistment be changed to a two (2) month extension and his date of separation (DOS) be changed to 2 April 2002. When airmen receive approved retraining……airmen satisfy...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02769
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02769 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The twenty-three (23) month extension to his 25 February 1998 enlistment be changed to a two (2) month extension and his date of separation (DOS) be changed to 2 April 2002. When airmen receive approved retraining……airmen satisfy...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03497
The applicant reenlisted on 21 September 2001 for six (6) years giving him a date of separation (DOS) of 20 September 2007. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommended disapproval and stated member had reenlisted prior to retraining approval, there is no reason to cancel this reenlistment and replace it with an extension. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919
They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01399 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Letter of Evaluation (LOE), dated 3 Feb 96, become a permanent addendum to his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 30 Nov 96; his Officer Selection Brief (OSB), dated 19 May 98, be corrected to reflect his Date of Separation as Indefinite and any reference to a retirement date...
A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and furnished responses and additional documentary evidence which are attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04037 INDEX NUMBER: 112.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 33-month extension of his 26 Jan 00 enlistment be reduced to 14 months. On 16 Dec 02, he requested a 33-month extension of this enlistment for the purpose of acquiring retainability for retraining. ...