RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-03840
INDEX CODE 112.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Date of Enlistment (DOE) be changed to 15 Aug 90 and his Date of
Rank (DOR) to E-6 be changed to 1 Apr 98.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His total inactive service should be added to his DOE and his DOR
adjusted.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Marine Corps on 11 Jun 91. He was
promoted to the grade of E-6 with a DOR of 1 Apr 98 and honorably
discharged on 15 Nov 01 after ten years, five months and six days of
active service. He also had 9 months and 27 days of prior inactive
service.
He enlisted for a period of four years with the Regular Air Force and
was ordered to extended active duty (EAD) on 28 Jun 02. Based on his
break in service, his DOR for E-6 was adjusted to 12 Nov 98.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAO advises that a Statement of Service (SOS) and a Date of
Rank Adjustment were accomplished and correctly verified the
applicant’s service dates. His Total Prior Inactive Service time has
no effect whatsoever on the DOE. His DOE is his EAD date of 28 Jun 02.
Prior to enlisting in the Air Force, the applicant had a 1 year, 7
month and 11 day break in service that adjusted
his DOR to 12 Nov 98. Based on governing directives, the applicant’s
service dates were computed correctly and his request should be
denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 24 Dec 03 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded
his DOE and DOR should be changed as requested. His contentions are
duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force. The applicant’s Total Prior Inactive Service time
has no effect on the DOE. Governing directives required his DOR to E-6
be adjusted to 12 Nov 98 because of the more than one year break in
service. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that
the applicant has not sustained his burden of having suffered either
an error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought.
4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore,
the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 February 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Ann-Cecile McDermott, Member
Ms. Leslie E. Abbott, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-03840 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, dated 19 Dec 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Dec 03.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03805
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant reiterates her request to change her DOR to her original active duty date of 1 Jul 00 or in the alternative consideration for her time served in the Air Force Reserve. _____________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02615
This change was not grandfathered to prior service members that returned to active duty prior to the date of publication of the change. Applicant’s adjusted date of separation was more than 2 years but less than 4 years; therefore, applicant received 25% of time in grade of E-5 and date of rank was established as 10 Feb 00. Effective 18 Dec 01 AFI 36-2604, para 8.2, was changed to read, “prior service enlisted returning to active duty in the same grade, before the fourth anniversary of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00978
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His current EAD date reflects the date he transferred from the active United States Army (USA) to the active United States Air Force (USAF). At the time of applicant’s separation from the USA, he was serving in the grade of captain (O-3) and had a total of seven years, five months and nine days of active duty service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03028 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 29 Feb 00 to 2 Nov 97, his DOR when he served in the Air National Guard (ANG); his extended active duty (EAD) date reflect 2 Mar 99 vice 29 Feb 00, and his Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS) tests...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01661
However, should the Board approve the relief sought, the record should be corrected to reflect a pay date of 17 Mar 87. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the following legal opinion is provided. Exhibit F. Letter, HQ USAF/JAG, dated 28 Feb 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03578 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be adjusted from 15 November 1996 to 15 November 1999. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to his release from active duty, Reduction-In Force, in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03593
His time in service dates were adjusted by the four months and five days of his break in service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAO recommended denial indicating that the time frame from when the applicant was discharged to the time he returned to active duty was less than two years, which entitled him to 50 percent of his time in grade as a staff sergeant. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02825
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02825 INDEX CODE 129.01 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time in grade (TIG) as an E5 be corrected to reflect all of his TIG from prior service in the US Navy and his date of rank (DOR) as an Air Force E5 be changed from 7 Mar 00 to 25 Jul 99. ...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD), Total Years Service Date (TYSD), Pay Date, and Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) are in error. With his five years in the active Air Force, he had almost eighteen years of military service when he was informed in Jan 00, that he would be discharged immediately. There was no evidence that the applicant was informed by ARPC of the implications of his...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 88-02168A
A complete copy of the DPMAJA evaluation is at Exhibit L. The Officer Appointment/Selective Continuation Section, AFMPC/DPPPOC, reviewed the submissions and recommended denial of the applicant's request that a statement be placed in his OSR reflecting he was not eligible for the CY86 Regular Air Force (RegAF) Appointment Board. A complete copy of the DPPPOC evaluation is at Exhibit M. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...