RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03578
INDEX CODE: 131.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of rank (DOR) be adjusted from 15 November 1996 to 15 November
1999.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to his release from active duty, Reduction-In Force, in 1992, and
subsequent return to active duty seven years later, his DOR was
recalculated as 15 November 1996. This new DOR afforded him one officer
performance report (OPR) as a captain when he was considered for major in
the primary zone, while other officers met the same board with 4-7 OPRs
as a captain. His reduced number of OPRs were primarily due to his
initial and requalification training as a B-52 Electronic Warfare Officer
encompassing approximately 50% of his active duty time, receiving only
training reports not OPRs.
His lifelong desire has been to serve in the US Air Force as a career
officer and the readjustment to his DOR would allow him a fair
opportunity to meet that goal.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Reserve of the
Air Force on 7 May 1988. He entered on extended active duty on 20
October 1988 and was progressively promoted to the grade of captain with
an effective date and date of rank of 28 July 1992. He was released from
active duty and transferred to the inactive reserve on 31 December 1992.
Applicant returned to extended active duty on 11 March 2000 in the grade
of captain with an adjusted date of rank of 15 November 1996.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAO reviewed the applicant’s request and found that his date of
rank was computed correctly. In accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service
Dates and Date of Rank, paras 7.5.1.1 and 7.5.1.2, applicant was given
100% credit for all active duty in the grade of captain and one-half day
credit for each day that he performed active--but not active duty--
commissioned service in the grade in which applicant entered the active
duty list (ADL). Applicant has 5 months and 3 days active duty in the
grade of captain and 2 years, 10 months, and 23 days of active service,
for a total of 3 years, 3 months and 26 days. When this total is
subtracted from the entry to active duty date, you arrive at a date of
rank of 15 November 1996.
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommended disapproval. Based on the applicant’s DOR of
15 November 1996, he met the CY02A Major Central Selection Board which
convened on 19 Feb 02. He was not selected for promotion. He also met
the CY02B Major Central Selection Board which convened on 28 Oct 02. To
date, those results have not been released.
Although the applicant had only one OPR as a captain before meeting his
first board, this is not any more unusual than those officers returning
to active duty under the Voluntary Recall program and other Reserve
transfer programs. Current EAD requirements for meeting a promotion
board for officers returning to active duty is 12 months.
If he is nonselected off the CY02B board, he will be offered continuation
to retirement eligibility.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10
Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response (Exhibit E).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions that his date
of rank (DOR) to the grade of major should be adjusted to 15 November
1999 are duly noted. However, we do not find these arguments
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale expressed by the Air
Force. After careful review of the evidence provided, we found no
evidence showing that the applicant’s established DOR was contrary to the
governing instruction and policy in effect at the time or that he has
been treated differently than others who were similarly situated. We
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for
our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of
having suffered either an error or injustice. There being insufficient
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially
add to our understanding of the issue involved. Therefore, the request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
03578 in Executive Session on 18 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Oct 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, dated 2 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, dated 26 Dec 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 03.
PHILIP SHEUERMAN
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01022
Additionally, since the citations filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) should mirror the decorations displayed on the OSB, the only way to ensure the board members were aware that he received this award would have been to write a letter to the board president for each respective board. The Air Force advisory states the only way the applicant could ensure the board members were aware of his award was to write the board president for each respective board. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the applicant’s EAD requirement be waived to the normal six months and he be allowed to meet the CY02B...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00661
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) was wrongfully considered by the CY97 Major Board. He believes that based on AFI 36-2501, dated 16 July 2004, under promotion ineligibility, he should not have been considered for promotion, because he returned to active duty under the Voluntary Recall Program, which required 12 months on active duty prior to meeting a board. The applicant’s complete response, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03645
The evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and provided a response that is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Therefore, the majority recommends his record, to include an OSB reflecting his correct duty history, be considered for promotion by SSB for the CY00A lieutenant colonel...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02964
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02964 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to SSgt (E-5) be corrected from 6 Feb 01 to 1 Jan 96, his DOR when he served in the U.S. Army. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority believes that it is not unreasonable to believe that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00517
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-00517 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Major Selection Board with the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) corrected to reflect receipt of three, rather than two, Air Force Commendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00856
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00856 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be reconsidered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY01A (18 Jun 01) (P0401A) central major selection board. The DPASA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01273
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01273 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to major be readjusted to approximately 1 Aug 01, as if selected by the Calendar Year 2000B (CY00B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB), rather than the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03157 INDEX CODE: APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be recalculated to provide one hundred (100) percent credit for the months spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03157 INDEX CODE: APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be recalculated to provide one hundred (100) percent credit for the months spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,...