Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03640
Original file (BC-2003-03640.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03640
            INDEX NUMBER:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and that it be  added
to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Thailand during time of war, 1973-1974, as an F-4 crew
chief.  He states that he served when and where the Air Force  sent
him.  He served in Northern  Thailand  near  Laos  where  duty  was
hazardous, and lives were lost.

In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214.


The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is   at
Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military  records  could  not  be  located  at  the
National  Personnel  Records  Center.   Therefore,  the   following
information has been obtained from documentation  provided  by  the
applicant.

The applicant served on active duty in the Air Force from 14 Jul 71
– 13 Jul 75; his DD Form 214 reflects 334 days of duty in Indochina
or Korea after 5 Aug 64.  However there is no indication  where  or
when this duty was performed.  He served 11 months and  4  days  of
Foreign Service.

His DD Form 214  reflects  he  was  awarded  the  National  Defense
Service Medal, Air Force Good Conduct  Medal,  and  the  Air  Force
Longevity Service Award Ribbon.

On 13 Jul 75, he was honorably released from  active  duty  in  the
grade of E-4, and transferred to the Air Force Reserves.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied, and states,  in
part,  that  the  applicant  did  not  provide   documentation   to
substantiate his claim that he served in Thailand from 1973 – 1974.

On  1  Dec  03,  AFPC/DPPPR  advised  the  applicant   to   provide
documentation showing he served in Thailand during the period 4 Jul
65 to 28 Mar 73 in order to verify his eligibility for award of the
VSM; he did not respond.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 6 February  2004,  a  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30  days.
As of this date, no response  has  been  received  by  this  office
(Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this  respect,
we note that attempts to locate the applicant’s military  personnel
records have been unsuccessful.  Additionally,  the  applicant  has
not provided documentation  showing  that  he  served  in  Thailand
during the period in question.  Absent evidence substantiating  the
applicant served in Thailand, we find that there is no  basis  upon
which to favorably consider his request.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
03640 in Executive Session on 1 April 2004, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Panel Chair
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
      Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 03
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 28 Jan 04
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 04




                                   ROSCOE HINTON JR.
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02998

    Original file (BC-2002-02998.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his service record. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Nov 02 and 7 Mar 03 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03352

    Original file (BC-2002-03352.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he served temporary duty tours in Guam, Vietnam and Okinawa. We thoroughly reviewed the applicant's submission and the available evidence of record and do not find evidence which would lead us to believe that he meets the requirements for award of the VSM. Should he secure supporting documentation to show that he meets the requirements for award of the VSM, the Board would reconsider his application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00122

    Original file (BC-2003-00122.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00122 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03020

    Original file (BC-2003-03020.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03020 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, “Old Glory Rod Gallantry Cross”, Unit Award,” the Korean Defense Service Medal, and the Purple Heart...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01583

    Original file (BC-2003-01583.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Jun 03, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he was not eligible for the AFOLTR because the award was not established until 12 Oct 80, after his separation from the Air Force on 9 Jan 80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial because the applicant is not eligible for the AFOLTR, which is awarded only to service members who completed an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. After a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03042

    Original file (BC-2003-03042.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A revision to AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and Decorations Program, reduced the time requirement from 36 months to 24 months for award of the Combat Readiness Medal. In 1994, the criteria for award of the CRM changed from 36 months to 24 months of duty while assigned to a unit designated by a Major Command (MAJCOM) as a combat ready unit. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02285

    Original file (BC-2003-02285.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 15 October 1973 release from active duty, be amended to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-02825

    Original file (bc-2003-02825.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR states that there is no medical documentation showing that the applicant received any wounds or injuries and he did not provide any. His case was denied by the PH Review Board on 22 Oct 03 because of the lack of clear-cut information and documentation showing he was wounded by the enemy and received medical treatment for a wound. Through his Congressman, applicant requested additional time to provide a response to the Air Force evaluation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00560

    Original file (BC-2004-00560.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00560 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02850

    Original file (BC-2003-02850.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He did not feel his injury was serious enough at the time for a PHM although two other members of the crew were awarded the PHM. However, he has provided no documentation showing his knee was injured in the parachute jump on 2 March 1945 or that he received any medical treatment for such an injury. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the records be corrected as indicated below.