RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03331
INDEX CODE: 100.00; 100.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Information reflected on her separation document relating her Home of
Record (HOR) and Nearest Relative be corrected.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The HOR annotated on her DD214 was never a home of record at time of entry.
The nearest relative listed is not a relative, and the name and address
are bogus.
Applicant did not provide any documentation in support of the appeal.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted her enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 14 May
1990. DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, reflects XXXXXXXX, as
her HOR. This same information was reflected on the Standard Form 93
(Report of Medical History), completed by the applicant on 23 February 1990
when she underwent a physical examination for enlistment.
The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of senior airman (E-4)
on 3 November 1994 under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Personality
Disorder). She had served 4 years, 5 months and 20 days on active duty.
Her HOR reflected on her separation document was the same as the one she
reported at enlistment. Her nearest relative was listed as Ms. D--- V. W---
, at a Chicago, Illinois address.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE stated that the HOR is defined as the place recorded as the
home of the individual when they entered active duty. It is recorded in
the military personnel record for the sole purpose of determining
transportation entitlements upon separation, or those of dependents in the
event of a member’s death while on active duty. While legal addresses may
change from time to time during a member’s career, HOR remains constant.
They recommend denial of the applicant’s request (Exhibit C).
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial. They stated that no errors or
irregularities occurred in the initiation or completion of the DD Form 214.
All criteria of the pertinent regulation were met and the DD form 214
reflects the individual’s name and address as provided by the applicant
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19
December 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2003-03331 in Executive Session on 12 February 2004, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603.
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 02 Oct 2003.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Nov 2003.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Dec 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01317 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to reenter the Air Force. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00674
(b) On 10 August 1986, received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to call his duty section as directed. On 18 December 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) approved applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable; however, his request for a change of RE code was denied. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03143
He was discharged on 18 September 2002 with an entry-level separation, as he had not completed his first term of service. ____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this case and recommended the narrative reason for discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority but that otherwise no change to the applicant’s RE code was warranted. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01489
In support of his application, the applicant provided a personal statement, copies of his military personnel records, a letter from the applicant’s father to the basic training commander, and a statement from the applicant’s recruiter. DPPRS states that by signing the “Statement of Understanding of Sickle-Cell Trait and Discharge Options” the applicant acknowledged the Air Force’s policy on sickle cell trait and understood, if he elected to separate, he would not be allowed back into the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00910
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 4...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01231
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01231 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. He recommended a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01852
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends that the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation (DD Form 214, Blocks 26 & 28) be changed to “KFF—Secretarial Authority” (see Exhibit C). Therefore, we recommend that the narrative reason for his separation and corresponding separation code be changed to reflect “Secretarial Authority.” 4. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-01852 MEMORANDUM FOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01272
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 Jan 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment with 30 days. In this respect, the majority of the Board notes that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program, she listed XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX as her HOR. Accordingly, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03592
On 28 December 1990, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 35-10, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, with an honorable discharge. On 28 December 1990 the applicant submitted a conditional waiver to an administrative review board contingent on receiving no less than an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02017
She provided no other facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice that would warrant an upgrade of her discharge to general. Other than her own uncorroborated assertions, evidence has not been provided which would lead us to believe that the action taken to affect her discharge from the Air Force was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at...