RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00910
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to an RE-1.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She struggled in tech school. She did not choose to be a security
forces member.
Applicant did not submit any documents in support the appeal.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 February 2002.
Enlistment documents reveal that she was guaranteed classification
into an Air Force Specialty (AFS) in the General Aptitude Area without
a promise of a specific specialty.
Following her successful completion of basic military training, on 6
May 2002, the applicant was assigned to duties as a Security Forces
trainee. On 30 May 2002, she was disenrolled from training due to
academic deficiency over which it was determined she had control. It
was reported that she failed to achieve a passing score on the second
written test two times and that the applicant lacked the desire and
aptitude to successfully complete the training or to have a successful
Air Force career.
On 13 June 2002, discharge proceedings were initiated against the
applicant under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 and AFPD 36-32 (Entry
Level Performance and Conduct). The applicant was advised of her
rights and waived her rights to consult counsel and submit statements
in her own behalf. The file was reviewed and found legally sufficient
by an assistant staff judge advocate. On 17 June 2002, the discharge
authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the
applicant be given an Entry Level Separation.
On 21 June 2002, while serving in the grade of airman basic, the
applicant was separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI
36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (Entry-Level Performance
and Conduct) and received an uncharacterized entry-level separation.
She was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C. She
served 4 months and 17 days of total active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation at that time. Additionally, the discharge was within the
sound discretion of the discharge authority.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE states that the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C,
“Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level
separation without characterization of service” is correct.
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 4 June 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application, BC-
2003-00910, in Executive Session on 31 July 2003, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 Apr 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Jun 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01317 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to reenter the Air Force. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01122
On 22 October 2002, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to report for mandatory weekend remedial training. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the reenlistment code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” was properly accessed to the applicant’s record as he was discharged in accordance with Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00866
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00866 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01037
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and stated that airmen are given entry- level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. After careful consideration of the circumstances of this case and the evidence provided by the applicant, we are not persuaded that the applicant's discharge and the reenlistment code he received...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01852
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends that the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation (DD Form 214, Blocks 26 & 28) be changed to “KFF—Secretarial Authority” (see Exhibit C). Therefore, we recommend that the narrative reason for his separation and corresponding separation code be changed to reflect “Secretarial Authority.” 4. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-01852 MEMORANDUM FOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03143
He was discharged on 18 September 2002 with an entry-level separation, as he had not completed his first term of service. ____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this case and recommended the narrative reason for discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority but that otherwise no change to the applicant’s RE code was warranted. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-00683
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 March 2004 for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected by deleting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces. In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal statement, and a letter of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01890
We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 9 Jul 03. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03756
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03756 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 3K, and the narrative reason for separation be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...