Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03198
Original file (BC-2003-03198.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03198
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXX     COUNSEL:  None

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His General (Under Honorable  Conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He got into trouble in the Air Force for using drugs and alcohol.   He
now has 5 years of sobriety and attends Alcoholic  Anonymous  meetings
and church.  He volunteers 10 hours per week at a local charity.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 13 Nov 78.  On 4
Jun 81, his commander  notified  him  that  he  was  recommending  his
discharge from the Air Force for his  failure  to  complete  the  unit
rehabilitation program and evidence  of  misconduct  in  his  military
record consisting of his conviction by special court-martial on 17 Mar
81 for  wrongfully  transferring  21.3  grams  of  marijuana  and  for
transferring 5.8 grams  of  hashish  on  20  Oct  80.   The  applicant
acknowledged receipt on 5 Jun 81 and  did  not  request  retention  or
submit statements in his behalf.  The recommendation for discharge was
found legally sufficient and  the  applicant  was  discharged  with  a
General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge on 15 Jul 81.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRSP recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  Even though
the applicant has made personal improvements during the last 5  years,
he did  not  submit  any  new  evidence  or  identify  any  errors  or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
31 Oct 03 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response
has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

FBI REPORT:

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau  of  Investigation
(FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a Report of  Investigation  pertaining
to applicant.

The complete report is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE FBI REPORT:

A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 18  Dec  03
for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response  has  not
been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  We find no  impropriety  in  the
characterization  of  applicant’s  discharge.   It  appears  that  the
applicant’s  discharge  was  consistent  with   the   procedural   and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and that  he  was
afforded all rights to which he was entitled at the time of discharge.
 In considering applicant’s request based on clemency, it appears that
he has made a successful post-service adjustment and is obtaining help
for his problems with drugs and alcohol.   However,  in  view  of  the
extreme seriousness of the misconduct for which he was discharged,  we
do not believe that an upgrade of his discharge to  honorable  on  the
basis of clemency is warranted.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
03198 in Executive Session on 19 February 2004, under  the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
      Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Sep 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 20 Oct 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 03.
    Exhibit E.  FBI Report
    Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 18 Dec 03.




                                   VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703074

    Original file (9703074.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist Separations Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive require*ments of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion or the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03230

    Original file (BC-2003-03230.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRSP evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response and additional documentary evidence which are attached at Exhibit F. A copy of the FBI Report was forwarded to applicant on 18 Dec 03 for review and response. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103544

    Original file (0103544.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03544 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable (general) conditions discharge. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, the Board majority is not persuaded to recommend upgrading the discharge. In...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509

    Original file (BC-2006-00509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02642

    Original file (BC-2003-02642.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02642 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given constructive credit for eight months of service and allowed to retire from the Air Force. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01197

    Original file (BC-2004-01197.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01197 INDEX CODE 100.06, 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect (1) a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that allows reenlistment, (2) additional time served, and (3) receipt of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), the Expert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200099

    Original file (0200099.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    HQ AFPC/DPSAMP completed the AF Form 281 to change his name on the Air Force file for any contact purpose. The DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, is only used to correct an error on the DD Form 214 if it was in error at the time of discharge. He provided several documents to substantiate his claim of the correct spelling of his name.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00048

    Original file (BC-2003-00048.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00048 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00071

    Original file (BC-2005-00071.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Mar 82, the Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period 29 Jan 81 through 28 Jan 82, was referred to the applicant. Time lost for the following periods: 28-31 Oct 81, 15-16 Dec 81, 29 Jan- 1 Feb 82, 16-21 Feb 82, and 20 May 82-23 Sep 82. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jan 05 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103255

    Original file (0103255.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 26 Jan 89. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. A complete...