RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03004
INDEX CODE: 100.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Item 6 of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be corrected to reflect her Reserve Obligation Termination Date of 19
February 2006, rather than “N/A.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She initially enlisted in the Air Force for four years of active duty and
four years of inactive Reserve duty. When she reentered the Air Force on
26 August 2003, after a break in service, her Total Active Federal Military
Service Date (TAFMSD) was wrongfully changed from 19 February 1998 to 24
July 1999.
In support of her application, the applicant submits a personal statement;
a copy of her DD Form 214; a copy of her initial enlistment contract, dated
20 February 1998; a copy of her enlistment contract and special order,
dated 26 August 2003; and a copy of her statement of service. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 February 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve under
the Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP) at the age of 18 in the grade of
airman basic (E-1) for a period of eight years. On 29 April 1998, the
applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve and accepted for
enlistment in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic for a
period of four years. On 1 November 2001, the applicant was found
medically disqualified from her Primary Air Force Specialty Code (PAFSC)
when considered under the Selective Reenlistment Program. She acknowledged
receipt of the non-selection notification, chose not to obtain proper
retainability to retrain into another PAFSC, and indicated she did not
intend to appeal the decision. The applicant was honorably discharged on
31 May 2002 for completion of required active service with a reentry code
of 2X (first term airman considered but not selected for reenlistment).
She served four years, one month, and two days on active duty.
On 26 August 2003, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of senior airman for a period of four years. Due to her break in
service from 1 June 2002 to 25 August 2003, her TAFMSD was adjusted to 24
July 1999. The applicant is currently serving on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPAE states that according to the
applicant’s master personnel records, her discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and
within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant was
discharged without regard to her military service obligation when she was
non-selected for reenlistment. When the applicant returned to active duty,
it was required to adjust her TAFMSD due to her break in service. It is
DPPRS’s opinion that the applicant’s adjusted TAFMSD date of 24 July 1999
is correct and that no error or injustices occurred in the applicant’s
discharge or reenlistment processing. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30
January 2004, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
records, we found no evidence that the applicant’s discharge or
reenlistment was not consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the governing regulations. We note the applicant’s non-
selection for reenlistment status resulted in her discharge without regard
to her military service obligation; therefore, she no longer had a military
service obligation. Accordingly, item six on her DD Form 214 reflected
“N/A.” When she reentered the military on 25 August 2003, she incurred a
break in service from 1 June 2002 to 25 August 2003 and, therefore, it
apears her TAFMSD was correctly adjusted to 24 July 1999. The applicant
has provided no evidence showing the contrary. Accordingly, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2003-03004:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 03 with attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/ DPPRS, dated 22 Jan 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jan 04.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. In this respect, it appears that the narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02941
On 12 June 2001, the applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) for a period of four years. AFI 36-2606 paragraph 2.5.3 states that prior service personnel may receive an SRB if they reenlist within three months after discharge or release from active duty. Evidence has not been provided showing that the applicant should have received an SRB based on her 12 June 2001 prior service enlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02909 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 MARCH 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from “3A” to a “1” to allow reentry into the active duty military. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00209
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPRS affirms based on the documentation in the master personnel records, the separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within the discretion of the separation authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...
HQ AFPC/DPPAE informally advised the AFBCMR Staff that she could have reenlisted on 20 July 1998, when she had assumed the SRA because members can reenlist within three duty days beyond their DOS. Since HQ AFPC/DPPAE informally advised that a member can reenlist within three duty days beyond the DOS, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below to allow her to receive her SRB at the appropriate pay grade without a break in service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed. Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the commander’s...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00134 INDEX CODE: 112.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlistment grade be changed from senior airman (E-4) to his previous grade of staff sergeant (E-5), with a date of rank of 1 Sep 95. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was miscounseled on his enlistment options for the Regular Air Force and as a result, he lost a stripe and active duty time. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01632
They also noted the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, or provide any facts warranting a change to her reenlistment eligibility code. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant opined that no change in the records is warranted. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02754
The following AF Forms 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration, were on file in the master personnel record. She received an RE code of 2Y “A second-term or career airman considered but not selected for NCO status, or had vacated NCO status under AFR 39-13.” The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Oct 05, copies of the Air Force...