Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03004
Original file (BC-2003-03004.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03004
                                        INDEX CODE:  100.03
  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX            COUNSEL:  NONE

  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Item 6 of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge  from  Active
Duty, be corrected to reflect her Reserve Obligation Termination Date of  19
February 2006, rather than “N/A.”

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She initially enlisted in the Air Force for four years of  active  duty  and
four years of inactive Reserve duty.  When she reentered the  Air  Force  on
26 August 2003, after a break in service, her Total Active Federal  Military
Service Date (TAFMSD) was wrongfully changed from 19  February  1998  to  24
July 1999.

In support of her application, the applicant submits a  personal  statement;
a copy of her DD Form 214; a copy of her initial enlistment contract,  dated
20 February 1998; a copy of  her  enlistment  contract  and  special  order,
dated 26 August  2003;  and  a  copy  of  her  statement  of  service.   The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 20 February 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force  Reserve  under
the Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP) at the age of 18 in the grade  of
airman basic (E-1) for a period of eight  years.   On  29  April  1998,  the
applicant was discharged  from  the  Air  Force  Reserve  and  accepted  for
enlistment in the Regular Air Force in the  grade  of  airman  basic  for  a
period of  four  years.   On  1  November  2001,  the  applicant  was  found
medically disqualified from her Primary Air  Force  Specialty  Code  (PAFSC)
when considered under the Selective Reenlistment Program.  She  acknowledged
receipt of the  non-selection  notification,  chose  not  to  obtain  proper
retainability to retrain into another  PAFSC,  and  indicated  she  did  not
intend to appeal the decision.  The applicant was  honorably  discharged  on
31 May 2002 for completion of required active service with  a  reentry  code
of 2X (first term airman considered  but  not  selected  for  reenlistment).
She served four years, one month, and two days on active duty.

On 26 August 2003, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  in  the
grade of senior airman for a period of four years.   Due  to  her  break  in
service from 1 June 2002 to 25 August 2003, her TAFMSD was  adjusted  to  24
July 1999.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  recommends  denial.   DPPAE  states  that   according   to   the
applicant’s master personnel records, her discharge was consistent with  the
procedural and substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation  and
within the  discretion  of  the  discharge  authority.   The  applicant  was
discharged without regard to her military service obligation  when  she  was
non-selected for reenlistment.  When the applicant returned to active  duty,
it was required to adjust her TAFMSD due to her break  in  service.   It  is
DPPRS’s opinion that the applicant’s adjusted TAFMSD date  of  24 July  1999
is correct and that no error  or  injustices  occurred  in  the  applicant’s
discharge or reenlistment  processing.   The  AFPC/DPPRS  evaluation  is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  30
January 2004, for review and comment within 30  days  (Exhibit  D).   As  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
records,  we  found  no  evidence  that   the   applicant’s   discharge   or
reenlistment  was  not  consistent  with  the  procedural  and   substantive
requirements of the governing regulations.  We  note  the  applicant’s  non-
selection for reenlistment status resulted in her discharge  without  regard
to her military service obligation; therefore, she no longer had a  military
service obligation.  Accordingly, item six on  her  DD  Form  214  reflected
“N/A.”  When she reentered the military on 25 August 2003,  she  incurred  a
break in service from 1 June 2002 to  25  August  2003  and,  therefore,  it
apears her TAFMSD was correctly adjusted to  24 July  1999.   The  applicant
has provided no evidence showing the  contrary.   Accordingly,  we  find  no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 11 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with  AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2003-03004:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 03 with attachments.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/ DPPRS, dated 22 Jan 04.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jan 04.




                                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103638

    Original file (0103638.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. In this respect, it appears that the narrative...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02941

    Original file (BC-2003-02941.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 June 2001, the applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) for a period of four years. AFI 36-2606 paragraph 2.5.3 states that prior service personnel may receive an SRB if they reenlist within three months after discharge or release from active duty. Evidence has not been provided showing that the applicant should have received an SRB based on her 12 June 2001 prior service enlistment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02909

    Original file (BC-2005-02909.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02909 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 MARCH 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from “3A” to a “1” to allow reentry into the active duty military. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00209

    Original file (BC-2006-00209.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPRS affirms based on the documentation in the master personnel records, the separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and the discharge was within the discretion of the separation authority.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981

    Original file (BC-2002-01981.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803090

    Original file (9803090.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    HQ AFPC/DPPAE informally advised the AFBCMR Staff that she could have reenlisted on 20 July 1998, when she had assumed the SRA because members can reenlist within three duty days beyond their DOS. Since HQ AFPC/DPPAE informally advised that a member can reenlist within three duty days beyond the DOS, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below to allow her to receive her SRB at the appropriate pay grade without a break in service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03605

    Original file (BC-2002-03605.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed. Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the commander’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900134

    Original file (9900134.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00134 INDEX CODE: 112.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlistment grade be changed from senior airman (E-4) to his previous grade of staff sergeant (E-5), with a date of rank of 1 Sep 95. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was miscounseled on his enlistment options for the Regular Air Force and as a result, he lost a stripe and active duty time. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01632

    Original file (BC-2005-01632.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They also noted the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, or provide any facts warranting a change to her reenlistment eligibility code. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant opined that no change in the records is warranted. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02754

    Original file (BC-2005-02754.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following AF Forms 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration, were on file in the master personnel record. She received an RE code of 2Y “A second-term or career airman considered but not selected for NCO status, or had vacated NCO status under AFR 39-13.” The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Oct 05, copies of the Air Force...