RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01976
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be
changed to allow his immediate reenlistment.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the
appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Separations Branch, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states
that the applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge
processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the discharge he
received. Therefore, they recommend denial of his request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Special Programs and BCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, reviewed this
application and states that the RE code of “2C” is correct.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 12 October 1998, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant upgrading the
applicant’s RE code to “3K”. In this respect, we note the applicant
successfully completed basic training and was attending technical school at
Lackland AFB when he requested separation. The applicant states that
shortly after he arrived at Lackland AFB, he discovered that a woman he had
been involved with was pregnant. He asked the woman to marry him and
requested separation to be with his pregnant, future wife. In view of this
and in order to provide the applicant the opportunity to apply for entry in
the Armed Forces, we recommend his RE-code be upgraded to RE code “3K”
(Secretarial Authority) which will render him eligible to reenlist, with an
approved waiver. Whether or not he is successful will depend on the needs
of the service and our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be
allowed to return to any branch of the service. Therefore, we recommend
his records be corrected to the extend indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on
27 September 1990, he was issued a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of
“3K.”
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 January 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Member
Mr. Phillip E. Horton, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 July 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 Aug 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAES, dated 22 Sep 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 12 Oct 98.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
On 17 Sep 98, applicant was notified by his commander that she was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The records indicate the applicant’s military service was properly reviewed and appropriate action was taken. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Special Programs & BCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, also reviewed this application and indicated that a review of the applicant’s case file was conducted and the RE code is...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01423 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized, entry-level separation be changed to reflect that he was honorably discharged for Convenience of the Government. The Medical Consultant further recommends that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to her discharge are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01351
He received a letter of counseling (LOC) on 17 October 2001 for being late for duty. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his contention of no longer being affected by “previous flaws”, in and by themselves, are sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 8 May 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01234
However, the recoupment of bonus monies is driven by the assigned SPD code. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. DFAS-POCC/DE recommends the applicant’s request to change his SPD code be denied. The applicant originally requested his RE code also be changed; however, AFPC/DPPRSP has administratively corrected his records to reflect he was issued RE code “1J.” Applicant’s contentions regarding the separation program designator (SPD) he was assigned at the time of his discharge are...
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s reenlistment code be changed to “3K.” A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Skills Management Branch, Directorate, Personnel Program Management, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, also reviewed the application and states that since the type of separation received drives RE codes, applicant’s code is correct as reflected. Therefore, we agree with the recommendation of the Medical Consultant to change the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable...
He was not told he had only 30 days to cancel the extension should the assignment get cancelled. On 29 April 2002, applicant submitted an AF Form 1411 requesting the extension be cancelled. Reenlistment personnel have also confirmed that TSgt W directed them not to do anything at that time, including not signing the form, but to direct him to complete a DD Form 149.