ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03823
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, she requests that her
Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be amended to reflect a Professional
Military Education (PME) recommendation for Intermediate Service School
(ISS) and that she be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a
Special Selection Board (SSB).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates the
applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date as 30 September
1991. She is currently serving on active duty in the grade of captain,
with a date of rank of 20 July 1995. The applicant has five nonselections
to the grade of major.
On 3 June 2003, the applicant’s request that her PRF be amended to reflect
a PME recommendation for ISS and that she be considered for promotion to
the grade of major by an SSB was considered and denied by the Board. For
an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Board’s
consideration of the appeal, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F.
On 25 March 2004, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration,
contending that the chain-of-command failed to adequately do their job in
accordance with Air Force instructions and did not understand the promotion
process. In addition, based on her colleague’s statement, her marital
status determined her promotion potential. The applicant’s submission is
at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was insufficient
evidence to warrant approval of the applicant’s request that her PRF be
amended to reflect a PME recommendation for ISS and that she be considered
for promotion to the grade of major by an SSB. After careful
reconsideration of her request we do not find it sufficiently compelling to
warrant a revision of the Board’s earlier determination in this case.
Based on her colleague’s personal observation, the applicant believes that
her marital status was a factor in determining her promotion potential.
There is nothing in the evidence provided which would lead us to believe
that this is the case. More importantly, there is no indication that the
applicant ever filed an Equal Opportunity Treatment complaint concerning
this alleged discrimination, as was her right to do. Based on the evidence
of record, we can discern no indication that the senior rater abused his
discretionary authority or that his comments were based on inappropriate
considerations. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting relief sought
in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 May 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 3 Jun 04 w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Application, dated 25 Mar 04/atchs.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
DPAP indicated that the ANG leadership considered but did not select the applicant to attend ISS in-residence upon promotion to major. ISS candidacy is determined during the major promotion board for active duty personnel where only a limited number of promotees are selected as ISS candidates. Since she was an ANG asset when she was selected for promotion to major, her consideration for ISS candidacy as an active duty officer was not warranted.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02587 INDEX NUMBER: 135.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) beginning with the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board. Additionally,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02671
The applicant’s PME Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not reflect award of the MSM but a copy of the citation was filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) on 21 August 2001. They indicated that the applicant’s PME Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not reflect award of the MSM but a copy of the citation was filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) on 21 August 2001. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00500
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE notes the rater is simply letting the applicant know that her assessment was what she intended it to be at the time and she has no valid reason to change her assessment four years later. Exhibit F. Letter, Counsel, dated 7 May 04. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-2004-00500 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02633A
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit H. The applicant submitted a letter from the commander, dated 12 June 2002, requesting applicant’s records be amended to correct the stratification on his CY99B PRF. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the additional Air Force evaluation and states that the opinion does not address the issue currently under review by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03649
The rater and additional rater of the contested OPR provide statements contending that the correct PME level on the report should have been for SSS rather than ISS. The OPR closing 23 Jun 97 recommends SSS in residence. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant altering the 23 Jun 96 OPR to reflect a PME recommendation of “SSS” rather than “ISS” and granting SSB consideration for the CY99A selection board.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01427-3
By letter, dated 26 Jul 10, the applicant provided a response to the advisories; stating neither he or his attorney received copies of the Air Force evaluations and had the Board been provided the additional letters of support, with the recommended change to his OER closing 14 Feb 84, he believes the recommended change to the rater and additional rater comments would have rendered more positive results (Exhibit H). He attached previous correspondence from the AFBCMR staff; however, in this...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 01427 3
By letter, dated 26 Jul 10, the applicant provided a response to the advisories; stating neither he or his attorney received copies of the Air Force evaluations and had the Board been provided the additional letters of support, with the recommended change to his OER closing 14 Feb 84, he believes the recommended change to the rater and additional rater comments would have rendered more positive results (Exhibit H). He attached previous correspondence from the AFBCMR staff; however, in this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00807
2 The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends an SSB be convened and the applicant’s record be competed for an in-residence seat against officers actually selected for ISS during his eligibility window. The complete DPSID evaluation is at...