Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00648
Original file (BC-2003-00648.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00648
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her narrative reason for separation be changed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her separation program designator (SPD) code (JFX) was assigned  to  her  in
error.  She has never been  diagnosed  with  a  personality  disorder.   She
indicates that she would like to reenlist in the Air Force.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  on  19  November  2002  in  the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years.

The applicant was notified of her commander's intent to  initiate  discharge
action against her for Conditions  That  Interfere  With  Military  Service,
Mental Disorders.

The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that  the
reason for his proposed action was the Behavioral  Analysis  Service  Letter
dated 27 January 2003 indicating that  she  was  diagnosed  with  Adjustment
Disorder with Depressed Mood.  Because of this  condition,  her  ability  to
function in a military environment was significantly impaired.

The commander advised the applicant of her right to  consult  legal  counsel
and submit statements in her own behalf; or waive  the  above  rights  after
consulting with counsel.




After consulting with counsel, the applicant  waived  her  right  to  submit
statements in her own behalf.

The discharge authority approved the applicant’s entry-level separation.

On 14 February  2003,  the  applicant  was  separated  with  an  entry-level
separation in the grade of airman basic, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
3208 (Personality Disorder).  She served  2 months  and  26  days  of  total
active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant  recommended  denial.   He  indicated  that  the
applicant’s past demonstrated inability to cope with the stress of  military
training and the presence of abnormal personality traits is predictive of  a
significantly increased risk for recurrence of Adjustment  Disorder  if  re-
exposed to  the  rigors  of  military  training  and  service.   Action  and
disposition in this case are  proper  and  equitable  reflecting  compliance
with Air Force directives that implement the law

The evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPRS  recommended  denial.   They  indicated  that  based   upon   the
documentation in the file, they believe the discharge  was  consistent  with
the procedural and substantive requirements  of  the  discharge  regulation.
Additionally, the discharge was  within  the  discretion  of  the  discharge
authority.  They concur with the BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation.

The evaluation is at Exhibit D.

AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of  “2C”  -  Involuntarily
separated with an honorable discharge,  or  entry-level  separation  without
characterization of service is correct.

The evaluation is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant provided a response that is at Exhibit G.

_________________________________________________________________






THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or  injustice  warranting  her  narrative  reason  for
separation be changed.  After a thorough review of the  evidence  of  record
and applicant’s submission, the discharge appears to be in  compliance  with
the governing AFI and we find no evidence to indicate  that  her  separation
from the Air Force was inappropriate.  We find no evidence of error in  this
case and after thoroughly reviewing  the  evidence  of  record,  we  do  not
believe she has suffered from an injustice.   Applicant’s  narrative  reason
and resulting separation program designator  code  accurately  reflects  the
reason for her involuntary entry-level separation  without  characterization
of service.   In  view  of  the  above,  we  agree  with  the  opinions  and
recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and  adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend  granting
the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice; that the application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 2 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
                 Mr. J. Dean Yount, Member







The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-
2003-00648 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 February 2003, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Military Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant,
                 dated 1 July 2003.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 14 July 2003.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 13 August 2003.
   Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 August 2003.
   Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 September 2003




                       WAYNE R. GRACIE
                       Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03570

    Original file (BC-2002-03570.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03570 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for his discharge be changed to honorable. On 20 September 2002, while enrolled in technical training, applicant was notified by his commander that in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman (personality disorder),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488

    Original file (BC-2002-01488.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03948

    Original file (BC-2002-03948.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that his reason for this action is the Statement of Mental Condition dated 30 October 2002 indicating that he was diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0100314

    Original file (0100314.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-02944 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for separation, personality disorder, be removed from her record and her records reflect her mother as the next of kin. However, since the Report of Separation reflects information furnished by the member at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00357

    Original file (BC-2003-00357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 2003-00357 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation be changed to a medical discharge. The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that he received a medical narrative summary dated 3 January 2003 that found the applicant did not meet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01172

    Original file (BC-2003-01172.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01172 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. She was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103208

    Original file (0103208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, her uncharacterized discharge should not be changed as it reflects her separation before completing a period of service (i.e., 180-days of continuous active service) that would allow an honorable characterization. In addition, AFPC/DPPRS recommends changing the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation to “JFF - Secretarial Authority.” AFPC/DPPRS states that the applicant’s discharge was in error and she should have been discharged under AFI 36-3208, paragraph...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03756

    Original file (BC-2002-03756.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03756 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 3K, and the narrative reason for separation be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02198

    Original file (BC-2002-02198.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears that she is requesting administrative corrections be made to her medical records and discharge documents. She submitted a hardship letter requesting that she be assigned to a different location or separated so that she could later reenlist. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00866

    Original file (BC-2003-00866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00866 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...