RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01678
(Case 2)
INDEX CODE: 135.00, 134.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
A ruling of no falsification on his AF Form 1288, Application for
Ready Reserve Assignment; granting of Reserve point credit for all
time missed; immediate assignment; and, participation in the 302
Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron (AES). In addition, the memorandum
from the commander of the Numbered Aeromedical Staging Squadron, dated
10 October 2002, be rescinded.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He does not believe he falsified his application for duty in the Air
Force Reserve. While he may have inadvertently entered some minor
data incorrectly, this was due to having to complete the AF Form 1288
on the date of his interview. Without Report on Individual Person
(RIP) sheets and complete documentation, he recreated dates to the
best of his memory. This incorrect data in no way constitutes
falsification or misrepresents his background.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement,
copies of AF Form 1288, a letter from the 302 ASTS/CC and additional
documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 30 September 2002, the applicant was honorably discharged from
active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3207 (completion of
required active service). He was serving in the grade of captain,
Reserve of the Air Force, and had completed 7 years, 5 months and 24
days of active service.
Information extracted from applicant’s submission reveals that he
completed Air Force Form 1288, Application for Ready Reserve
Assignment, on 13 September 2002. He was notified on 10 October 2002
that he was denied pay and point participation with the 302d
Aeromedical Staging Squadron (203 ASTS) for possible falsification of
his application for duty with the Air Force Reserve. On 16 December
2002, the applicant was notified of his assignment to the Headquarters
Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) as a nonparticipating member of
the Air Force Ready Reserve.
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
reveals that he is currently a nonparticipating member of the Air
Force Reserve, serving in the grade of captain, with a date of rank of
2 June 1994. He has completed a total of six years of satisfactory
Federal service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/DPM reviewed this application and recommended denial. DPM
states that cancellation of the applicant’s assignment action,
subsequent to the initial interview, was due to the gaining
commander’s further research concerning quality control factors. This
disqualifying factor [UIF] has been confirmed with the applicant’s
losing unit of assignment and in MilPDS. The HQ AFRC/DPM evaluation,
with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
27 June 2003 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice concerning the falsification issue. After
reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, the
Board majority is persuaded that relief is warranted. In this
respect, the Board majority noted that the applicant indicated he was
not prepared to complete the Reserve assignment application on the
date of his interview. The Board majority believes that, due to the
circumstances at that time, it is conceivable that the applicant
inadvertently failed to accurately complete AF Form 1288, Application
for Ready Reserve Assignment; therefore, any doubt should be resolved
in favor of the applicant. It is the opinion of the Board majority
that the Application for Ready Reserve Assignment was not falsified,
but rather was incomplete. In view of the foregoing, the Board
majority recommends the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
4. Notwithstanding the above, the Board is unpersuaded that granting
Reserve point credit for time missed, immediate assignment and
assignment to a particular squadron is warranted. By the Board
effectively removing the LOR/UIF, the quality control factor that
apparently led to the assignment cancellation no longer exists;
therefore, the applicant can reapply for a Reserve assignment. The
Board believes that the applicant’s Reserve assignment should be
accomplished through Air Force Reserve assignment processing. The
assignment of military personnel is a prerogative of the Air Force
Reserve Command and we are constrained to note that the needs of the
service are paramount in such actions. In view of the above and on
the basis of the available evidence, we are not inclined to favorably
consider the assignment issues or awarding the applicant credit for
time he did not serve.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that AF Form 1288,
Application for Ready Reserve Assignment, dated 13 September 2002, and
any and all references to falsification of the cited form, to include
the 302 ASTS/CC Memorandum, dated 10 October 2002, be declared void
and removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 19 November 2003 and 9 December 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
By a majority vote, Ms. Maust and Ms Willis recommended granting the
relief sought in this application concerning the falsification issue.
Mr. Markiewicz voted to deny this request but did not desire to submit
a minority report. All members voted to deny the remaining portions
of the applicant’s request. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPM, dated 27 Jun 03, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jun 03.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)
FROM: SAF/MRB
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of APPLICANT, AFBCMR Docket Number 2003-
01678
I have carefully considered all the circumstances of this case,
including the rationale of the Board’s recommendation to partially
grant. However, I believe the applicant’s stated request should be
fully granted.
Apparently, the applicant’s Reserve assignment was disapproved
due to disqualifying quality control factors. Specifically, the
applicant’s Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 15 March 2002, and an
Unfavorable Information File (UIF), which led to the falsification
issue. Through an earlier Board action, removal of the LOR and UIF
from the applicant’s records was approved.
In my opinion, removing the quality force indicators that led to
the disapproval of applicant’s Reserve assignment and the
falsification issue warrants the applicant full relief. In arriving
at my decision, I am aware that the courts have held that military
correction boards have an abiding moral sanction to determine what
constitutes an error or an injustice and to take steps to grant full
and fitting relief. Had it not been for the unfounded LOR/UIF, the
applicant’s assignment would have, in all probability, been approved
and he would have earned Reserve point credit for satisfactory Federal
service. I therefore believe that, in addition to the relief
recommended by the Board majority, reinstatement of the applicant’s
Air Force Reserve assignment and sufficient non-paid points to obtain
satisfactory years of service provides the applicant with full and
fitting relief. In view of the foregoing, I direct that the records
be corrected as set forth in the attached directive.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AFBCMR BC-2003-01678
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. Any and all references to falsification of the
Air Force Form 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment, dated
13 September 2002, to include the 302 ASTS/CC Memorandum, dated 10
October 2002, be, and hereby are, declared void and removed from his
records.
b. His Ready Reserve assignment was approved by
competent authority and, effective 1 October 2002, he was assigned to
the 302 Aeromedical Staging Squadron (302 ASTS), Peterson AFB, CO.
c. He was credited with 253 active duty points, 16 nonpaid Inactive
Duty Training (IDT) points, and 15 membership points for
retirement/retention year 21 January 2002 through 20 January 2003,
resulting in 284 total points; and, that the period 21 January 2002 through
20 January 2003 is a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
d. He was credited with 35 nonpaid Inactive Duty Training (IDT)
points and 15 membership points for retirement/retention year 21 January
2003 through 20 January 2004, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the
period 21 January 2003 through 20 January 2004 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118
The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00009
Subsequently, she met with the recruiter to sign and finalize an AF Form 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment; however, the application was not completed because the recruiter did not have the duty position number or the required waiver for her assignment to an overage position. In support of her application, the applicant provides a copy of her AF Form 1288; an excerpt from Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Instruction 36-2001, dated 21 April 2004; and two letters of support from...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03633
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1BR recommends the requested relief be denied. A complete copy of the HQ AFRC/A1BR evaluation is attached at Exhibit B. We took note of the applicant’s contentions and the documentation provided in support of his request for an In Line of Duty Determination for sleep apnea and retroactive lost participation points and time in grade for retirement from December 2004 through October 2005.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03472
It was recommended she be allowed to retire on her established retirement date of 19 Aug 09. e. On 14 Sep 09, AFRC/A1 notified the RMG that since the applicant is currently retired that she would need to file for incapacitation pay with the AFBCMR. The complete AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/JA and AFRC/SG did not and are not practicing due diligence with regard...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00509 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an Air Force Reserve retirement based on 20 satisfactory years of service. A memorandum, dated 18 Dec 97, indicated that the applicant, with an expiration term of service (ETS) of 12 Dec 97, had failed to reenlist and that...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00509
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00509 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an Air Force Reserve retirement based on 20 satisfactory years of service. A memorandum, dated 18 Dec 97, indicated that the applicant, with an expiration term of service (ETS) of 12 Dec 97, had failed to reenlist and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1996-02752A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 June 1998, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered the applicant’s request that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 31 January 1994, be corrected to reflect factual and thorough participation for the reporting period. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant removing the OPR closing...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03153
He be reinstated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 October 2010, with award of IDT points consistent with the average IDT points he earned between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2010. In this respect, we believe the evidence provided makes it clear that a serious personality conflict existed between the applicant and certain members of his chain of command as validated by Inspector General (IG) complaints filed by his supervisory chain and the applicant himself, as well...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01239 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: Mr. Joseph W. Kastl HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letters of Reprimand (LORs) dated 23 January 2003 and 17 July 2003, the Involuntary Separation Letter dated 24 March 2003 and the referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 1 August 2003 be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02127
The applicant presented materials for consideration and made a personal appearance; however, on 5 Jan 01 the XX AW commander strongly recommended to the 22nd Air Force (22 AF) commander that the applicant be removed from the promotion list. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFRC/DPM advises that the Article 15 was never placed in the applicant’s record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...