RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03633
INDEX CODE: 108.03
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 MAY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect an “In Line of Duty (LOD)
Determination” for Sleep Apnea and retroactive lost participation
points and time in grade for retirement from December 2004 to October
2005.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
(1) Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2910 requires an LOD be initiated
anytime a reservist is treated. (2) The presumption is any disease,
illness, or injury occurring or aggravated while on active duty is in
the LOD unless proven otherwise. (3) In November of 2005 the 10 AF/IG
advised the 920th RQW/CC to complete an LOD. (4) In November 2005 the
920th RQW/CC directed ASTS commander to initiate an LOD, this was
never completed. (5) He has incurred significant career and monetary
damages due to not having a completed LOD. (6) Other servicemembers
with similar conditions have and were kept on active duty until the
condition was corrected (he was released and had to pay for the
corrections). (7) Other servicemembers with similar conditions have
been reinstated on active duty with back pay. (8) He had a profile
that required a medical evaluation to clear.
He already paid for one medical evaluation and the ASTS wants him to
pay for another. He further states the entire process would be
covered by the government had an LOD been completed on time.
In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of orders,
correspondence and medical records.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserves (AFRes)
as a technical sergeant (TSgt).
The applicant was on active duty orders from February through December
2003. On his deployment physical he noted snoring. He was diagnosed
with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). The history noted snoring for
years, predating activation. His exam revealed a saggy soft palate
and large uvula. The applicant responded to Continuous Positive
Airway Pressure (CPAP), but ultimately required surgical intervention.
Following surgery on 29 June 2005, the applicant was asymptomatic.
The Air Force Form 348, Informal Line of Duty Determination was
initiated by the 920th Aeromedical Staging Squadron on 27 February
2006 and was finalized by the approving authority and the HQ AFRes
Command’s LOD Determination Board on 25 July 2006. The final
disposition of the LOD was Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)—LOD Not
applicable. The applicant was symptomatic at activation.
The applicant’s non-duty related fitness for duty case was completed
on 30 September 2005 and he was returned to duty HQ AFRC/SGP with an
indefinite waiver.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/A1BR recommends the requested relief be denied. They state HQ
AFRC/SG ruled the applicant’s sleep apnea existed prior to service and
was not aggravated by his military duties. The applicant’s request
for award of lost participation points and time in grade for
retirement cannot be approved.
A complete copy of the HQ AFRC/A1BR evaluation is attached at Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states He was
never notified of the final disposition of the LOD. He believes
without this notification he was denied his basic due process rights.
Because he was not notified and the 45 days are up he
was unable to respond to the findings with new and significant
evidence that indicates the likelihood of error (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took note of the
applicant’s contentions and the documentation provided in support of
his request for an In Line of Duty Determination for sleep apnea and
retroactive lost participation points and time in grade for retirement
from December 2004 through October 2005. The applicant underwent a
post deployment physical and noted snoring. He was diagnosed with
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) with a history of snoring for years,
predating activation. A LOD determination was completed on 25 July
2006 and determined the applicant’s OSA existed prior to service and
was not aggravated by his military duties. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-03633 in Executive Session on 29 March 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-03633 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Nov 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFRC/A1BR, dated 11 Jan 07.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jan 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 10 Feb 07.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03578
The LOD was not completed and a final determination was not provided. The LOD was initiated again on 4 Apr 06 and was finalized on 17 Nov 06 with the finding of “Existed Prior to Service-LOD Not Applicable.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/SGP recommends the requested relief be denied. SGP states a review of the applicant's medical records found the medical condition was addressed by the supporting reserve medical unit with...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03578 2
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 Jun 08 and 7 Jul 08, the Board considered and denied the applicants appeal requesting he receive a In Line of Duty (LOD) determination for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and he receive credit for lost participation points and time in grade for retirement for the period November 2003 through 2006. Applicants complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00880
Her OSA was found not in the line of duty by reason of Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) – LOD not applicable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SG recommends denial, noting that while her diagnosis corresponds to a period of active duty, absent a mid-face tumor or trauma, OSA has an incubation period of months to years. She notes she mistakenly did not provide all the active duty orders she had been on between the Jan 07 and Nov 09...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01918
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/SGP recommends denial, noting the applicant underwent two LOD determinations for his medical condition and that both were determined to be EPTS-NA. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His condition of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) be changed to reflect In the Line of Duty (ILOD) rather than Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) Line of Duty Not Applicable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02464
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Per AFI 36-2910, paragraph 3.4.1.2.3., the Eight Year Rule states a disabling condition will be found to be in the line of duty, even though the condition existed prior to serve (EPTS), if the member has a least eight years of active service (8 years do not have to be consecutive), and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02683 1
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should not have been discharged from active duty with unresolved medical issues and a Line of Duty (LOD) determination should have been initiated prior to his release from active duty. Although the applicant stated he received treatment for his medical conditions while he was on active orders, he has only provided subjective evidence following his release from active duty. If the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02351
Control of Member After PEB Action states, The MPF will not retire, discharge, nor release a member from active duty before receiving the final decision in the form of retirement orders or instructions from HQ AFPC/DPPD directing disposition. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00625
SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty member, SSG/E-5 (3P051/Security Forces Journeyman), medically separated from the Air Force after 10 years of service. VA treatment notes through 2008 show the CI continued to use his CPAP machine. Other PEB Conditions .